Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cjf4
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
151.
▲
by
cjf4
12y ago
What a pedantic article. The effectiveness of to do lists, or any other work management tool, is extremely sensitive to both the nature of the work and the nature of the person. Some people can be effective thinking about 3 things all day?
152.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
Well adjusted people? Sounds boring.
153.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
I think SV will go in that direction too, the last scene sure made it seem like the show cared about its characters.
154.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
That was probably the part I laughed the hardest at.
155.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
It's all about characters. If they're able to create an audience connection with characters, the show will be long lasting. Entourage (this show's closest comparison) had some pretty stupid episodes (the last season in partic
156.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
It baffles me that more startups don't have this approach. If you're going to take VC, you'd damn well be targeted and have a specific idea of how your going to use it to grow your business.
157.
▲
"The whole damn book is a hyperbolic sleight of hand"- Flash Boys, Reviewed
(mercenarytrader.com)
3 points
by
cjf4
13y ago
|
0 comments
158.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
I'd say you can skip college if you are really specific about something that doesn't require a degree, or you are extremely good at forging your own path (starting a company, freelance work, or if you are really well networked). O
159.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
My work has a relatively unique (I think) set up that in my opinion pulls the best of both worlds. Basically, it's a big semi circle of 6-8 half cubes around the manager. So if you are looking straight forward at your computer, there a
160.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
As someone who's left the beginner stages recently, I found OOP stuff to be mostly intuitive and easily to relate to real world examples. Steve Job's explanation at the below link galvanized it. The only difficult part was some of
161.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
It's a fine line though, because in any organization leadership is critical, and good leadership is not the result of a job title. A good leader fosters that collaboration, and points it in the right direction to meet some sort of larg
162.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
I'll avoid the legality of the suit, but I think the smiley face is being spun a bit by the article. Jobs wasn't sending the smiley face as some sort of grave dancing gesture, he was sending it as a "here, I took care of this
163.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
"The NBA is not run well" There are certain things they could do better (the cap, age requirement, too many teams) but I think this is a stretch. The Association does the best job of any American sports league with globalization,
164.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
He's not allowed to criticize officials, big difference.
165.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
And that's the bottom line...
166.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
This guy has to learn how to sell himself a little better. "Old Coder" and "70s" should not be the first two things on a resume.
167.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
This is all too postmodern.
168.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
Nothing you mentioned had any relevance to the idea of "American Exceptionalism."
169.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
"PAWWWWWL, I gotta startup that corrects misspelled 'Role Tide' Tattoos. WATCHU THINK??"
170.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
Really can't wait for "all the things" to stop being used as an acceptable replacement for "everything."
171.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
Calories in v calories out is absolute in terms of weight loss/gain, but that's just a quantitative measure, not a qualitative one. For instance, the famed "Twinkies at a Caloric Deficit" diet will cause you to lose weig
172.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
The portion of the status quo most related to spying is "Safe and Peaceful", so not sure I blame him.
173.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
This reminds me of an old talk radio adage: don't mistake callers for listeners. The people who call into a radio show represent a fraction of the audience, and are often the most extreme, polemic, loose hinged segment of that audience
174.
▲
by
cjf4
13y ago
The key piece of context about this quote is that Ryan Carson has a vested interest in people deciding they do not need a computer science degree to code.