Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cisanti
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
121.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
Because people lack gratitude for the life we have. (including me) No generation before has been so prosperous or lived so long, healthy lives. Now how do you solve that problem?
122.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
And what about border policy? You can't have open border policy + UBI together... I mean why not try to come to America then. I would I come if I had a chance to get UBI and live there, and millions, millions of others. Would the syste
123.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
It's bad in a sense that you're possible to identify uniquely by the advertisers. Do not track is snake oil anyway...
124.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
Because they implement the software manifesto build fast, ship often, fail quick to hardware. That's my opinion.
125.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
That is very interesting, can you give an estimate how much (more) does it cost to you be a registrar and own domains? Compared to random ones. I guess .fi is a bit more expensive than .com anyway.
126.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
How on earth are you supposed to live on the internet then? Become a domain name registrar? You can't really avoid them, can you?
127.
▲
Andrew Auernheimer (weev) claims Tor network is blocking Daily Stormer
(gab.ai)
2 points
by
cisanti
9y ago
|
0 comments
128.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
But Google has much more global power. Amazon is in Europe and other places too, but nowhere strong as in the United States. Google, on the other hand, has most of the world under its arm, besides China and maybe Russia.
129.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
If U.S or E.U would want to break up Google, how would it realistically work? I hope we see that happening, the company has become a monster and can literally tell the world what to think and how to feel.
130.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
What are you on? EU is the biggest market when it comes to prosperity / population. Some people need to drink less the libertarian kool-aid, Google is still recovering from missing out China and will do anything do anything eventually
131.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
Because media needs to write about something and they don't care if they fuck up the country and divide you? More white people are shot by police officers in your country, yet black community has a bigger crime rate. [0]: https:/&
132.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
But considering your population and crime rate in black communities, it's a nonissue in a sense that it happens so rarely. It's political and media issue. The latter needs to write about something so they don't care about the
133.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
That's the point, looting doesn't solve anything. If for an example, BLM would convince all the nurses to halt their job, all the firemen -- that would make a difference. But by the look of it, BLM does not have the support of the
134.
▲
Canada's conservative Rebel Media site down after service cut
(ca.reuters.com)
2 points
by
cisanti
9y ago
|
0 comments
135.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
It has everything to do with nice. If you use loopholes then you're not nice, you just know how to make more profit. It doesn't make you nice, only less noble and honest. Something being legal doesn't mean it's nice.
136.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
What about paying fair share of taxes that are expected to be paid by the society? Just like loopholes are legal, most of the time being not nice to people is legal. Meaning, nothing stops YC companies to sign a treaty that paying taxes is
137.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
Viscosity is nice on Windows. I think it costs 10 bucks, though... on Linux I don't know, I use CL.
138.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
I'm fairly well aware, I guess I have personal reasons to be afraid of the left ;) And the fact that I am also left, is what triggers me off. I'm sure I don't understand all the details but believe me seeing the whole media c
139.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
Absolutely, the reason I wrote left is that for the past decade it's the left I'm afraid of. Of course, the right can use them for evil too. But seeing how American media behaves, scandals around people who don't agree with t
140.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
I'm not from the United States, it's ignorant to think labeling everyone who doesn't agree with you having a rebel flag in their hand. It has nothing to do with me. Outside of the land of free, there are more possibilities th
141.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
Not an obligation, but their mission statement is "To organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful." Guess they need to change to "information that we and our advertisers agree with." Ye
142.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
I have (had) a channel that had videos about missing people, their last sightings on CCTV etc. The parents of a missing person even used an embed video on their site of a CCTV footage. They emailed me if I still have the video because they
143.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
Sure, it's possible for a few people and the digital nomads, but try telling your teenage daughter don't use Facebook products. Heck, it's even difficult for me because of events and stuff, but for the majority of people, it
144.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
The authoritarian regimes' secret police would be delighted at something like this. People actually (well, not all of us) give them information themselves, and those who don't, sure do get tracked across the web. "Thoughts co
145.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
Well, it sounds reasonable to ask that question if so many people have Adblock installed? I have always blocked ads and always (try) will be, but I this is the outcome from Adblock going mainstream. Yes, the ad networks/sites were the
146.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
Sure, grab me a link. I like his lectures and ideas even though I don't have much in common. He's extremely reasonable man and a good symbol for conservatives. If you demonize him, you're against idiots. If all the conservati
147.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
What are you talking about, what white genocide videos? Give me a source. And if you believe in something "your enemy" also happens to believe in doesn't mean you are on a thin line. The World doesn't work that way, prop
148.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
It was easier to cut the TV time for the kids. Every kid has a cell phone nowadays, for practical and popularity reasons, it's so much more difficult to manage their "online time". In the end, they become more tech-savvy than
149.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
Doesn't mean the idea itself is wrong, even if the author is a hypocrite. I don't care really about American politics, but Google and Facebook are dangerously big. I believe Europe should have some protectionism mechanism like Chi
150.
▲
by
cisanti
9y ago
Sounds cheesy, but I worked on something I actually enjoyed working with it, not thinking if it's a commercial success or anything that sort. I can't think of myself working out of working hours on something I do only for money. P
More ›