cirrus3

25 ms·

301.
by cirrus3 5y ago
> I still don't get it. Clearly not. Why does someone always have to assume they know better? > they chose the most difficult transport What are you even basing this statement on?
302.
by cirrus3 5y ago
You should add more info or a demo on the home page. You lost me at the signup page.
303.
by cirrus3 5y ago
Mandelmus blah blah blah. Stop. Think like a human capable of empathy and less like an algorithm for once. Society is not as simple as the hardest problem you have or will ever have to think about. And guess what, you would not pass that in
304.
by cirrus3 5y ago
He obviously doesn't. He is leaning hard on his highly questionable algorithmic narrative and has no actual clue on how real life works for many people or any exposure to it off his keyboard. It is sad for everyone really knowing these
305.
by cirrus3 5y ago
Mandelmus that is a lot of meaningless words to avoid the recognition that there are systematic objectives in play to repress others. "collective design" is stupid fancy term and you will look dumb saying that in person to anyone
306.
by cirrus3 5y ago
You could not miss the point harder. You are in bubble if you think people are working harder just to feel more productive. > Just like the rest of us ? who exactly do you only include in your sense of "us"?
307.
by cirrus3 5y ago
Yep.. this article is trope trope trope city, don't bother.
308.
by cirrus3 5y ago
> It's pretty easy to survive - even if you're homeless Stop typing. Stop now.
309.
by cirrus3 5y ago
The article seems to answer the question right up front. > as we’ve gotten richer and built more technology, we’ve developed a machine not for ending our wants, not for fulfilling them, but for generating new ones, new needs, new desires
310.
by cirrus3 5y ago
This is mostly a rant on the style of article title and intro. The content may be interesting, but I seriously doubt it. It starts off with: > Hunter-gatherers worked 15-hour weeks. Why don’t we? Uh, well, for starters, 15 hours is appar
311.
by cirrus3 5y ago
I really like the idea of that upcoming service. But, not exactly where you want to store a piece of information worth $2B. A good old fashioned safety deposit box in a Swiss bank or something and several layers of trustees would be more ap