chx

14 ms·

91.
by chx 2y ago
A better very through explanation is at https://reddit.com/r/BuyBorrowDieExplained/comments/1f26rsf/...
92.
by chx 2y ago
It's not at all simple what they do. https://reddit.com/r/BuyBorrowDieExplained/comments/1f26rsf/... Important quote: > this type of planning is generally not economically feasible unless the tax
93.
by chx 2y ago
Of course. The only thing LLMs are good for is... https://hachyderm.io/@inthehands/112006855076082650 > You might be surprised to learn that I actually think LLMs have the potential to be not only fun but genuinely
94.
by chx 2y ago
How do you know the output has anything to do with the input? Hint: you don't. You are building a castle on quicksand. As always, the only thing LLMs are usable for: https://hachyderm.io/@inthehands/1120068550760
95.
by chx 2y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Long_nineteenth_c... (I am linking like this because this version I read myself.)
96.
Trust Rules Everything Around Me(scottarc.blog)
3 points by chx 2y ago|0 comments
97.
by chx 2y ago
Not at all, someone here for example yesterday posted a summarize tool...
98.
by chx 2y ago
AI is never the answer. Unless ... https://hachyderm.io/@inthehands/112006855076082650 > You might be surprised to learn that I actually think LLMs have the potential to be not only fun but genuinely useful. “Show m
99.
by chx 2y ago
And very importantly: no one knows what that checkbox means and what are the consequences of checking it.
100.
by chx 2y ago
The whole thing is https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3167679/advance... it's very close to functionality wise right now to ACF. Not identical, already. While I am not a lawyer it almost certainly
101.
by chx 2y ago
tl;dr: Hardware is cheap. Engineers are expensive. > Instead of fearing the overhead in PHP for function calls, Already in 2015 in almost all applications this is a premature optimization which is rightly known as the root of all evil. P
102.
by chx 2y ago
It sure did. Dries cashed out thanks said upwards movement and then he realized this move destroyed the contributor pipeline (make a personal/charity/etc small website-tinker Drupal-contribute to Drupal) and also market share so h
103.
by chx 2y ago
Have you read https://trademarks.justia.com/983/21/advanced-custom-9832116... and https://trademarks.justia.com/983/21/acf-98321135.html ?
104.
by chx 2y ago
Did you read my original point? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41814310 given that, why on earth would I waste my time? Also note https://hachyderm.io/@inthehands/112006855076082650 > You migh
105.
by chx 2y ago
I would rather answer the first one :) Multilingual is built into Drupal and as far as I am aware, it's a plugin for Wordpress. Complex permissions/access control is another area where Drupal is much stronger. And overall, the mor
106.
by chx 2y ago
If cutting off some Wordpress users from plugin upgrades just because some beef between matt and wpengine didn't make you realize that's the train you are on, nothing will.
107.
by chx 2y ago
Not the first one. Cutting WPEngine customers off the plugin repository was one, too.
108.
by chx 2y ago
I'm glad but slightly surprised neither Crell nor me counts as worst drama for you. Good? I guess.
109.
by chx 2y ago
I am the last person in this world to malign Drupal, I have been contributing for twenty long, long years to it. But no, Drupal is not an alternative to Wordpress. Perhaps ten years ago but even then barely. Now? That's like saying a K
110.
by chx 2y ago
I don't think there was any bad blood between Drupal 8 and Backdrop, was there? It was forked in 2013 and look https://www.drupal.org/u/jenlampton Jen was still doing BADCamps and went to DrupalCons and all that.
111.
by chx 2y ago
According to https://make.wordpress.org/plugins/2021/02/16/reminder-forke... this is piracy. Let's look at newer documentation: https://developer.wordpress.org/plugins/wordpress
112.
by chx 2y ago
Yes, Retro SE also points out the Intel 8271 from 1977 was a dual core microcontroller.
113.
by chx 2y ago
Also, I raised the question at https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/q/30743/3722 and one of the answers points out the 1984 Rockwell R65C29 Dual CMOS Microprocessor. It was two standard 6502 on the same die us
114.
by chx 2y ago
Ehhhh the MAJC 5200 was generally available in 1999 and I am sure even older designs could be found if we were to dig deep enough. Their market share would also need some digging too. To quote the announcement: "two VLIW (very long ins
115.
by chx 2y ago
It is very Oracle that their license policy gives a reason to make crippled CPUs.
116.
by chx 2y ago
Indeed: the first dual core server chips only launched in 2005 afaik with 90nm Denmark/Italy/Egypt Opterons and Paxville Xeons but on the Intel side it wasn't until 2007 when they were in full swing.
117.
by chx 2y ago
any point? regardless of what's written? does that work for you?
118.
by chx 2y ago
Help me understand why people are using these. I presume you want information of some value to you otherwise you wouldn't bother reading an article. Then you feed it to a probabilistic algorithm and so you can not have any idea what
119.
by chx 2y ago
> and hasn’t meaningfully contributed back to the Wordpress project. That's what Matt says. WPEngine claims otherwise -- in a legal document, no less.
120.
by chx 2y ago
What's the downside? Who knows. Maybe a lawsuit. Don't ask. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41788704

More ›