Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
chromanoid
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
Copyright is just not prepared for AI. Training with copyrighted material could become "officialy legal" under copyleft terms, at least when the amount of training material exceeds a certain threshold.
62.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
Maybe enforcing open sourcing the models is the best route to go. At some point everything worthwhile ever created will be processed. Models can be seen as the processed, collective cultural output of humanity. It seems fair to me to force
63.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
I assume that there is a prompt that asks the LLM to generate its thoughts. This prompt is probably in English.
64.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
Ever heard of cooperatives? I think digital coops are the only really feasible way away from platform capitalism. e.g. https://www.hostsharing.net/
65.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
yeah, it is called _copy_ right. The question is, if AI is making obfuscated copies or not. interestingly in German it is not called copyright, but Urheberrecht "authors rights". So there the word itself implies more things. BTW
66.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
I think there complexity literally brings more money for the hyperscaler. Serverless monolith ftw
67.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
Wonderful quote! Thank you! Somewhat dealing with "frontend fatigue" right now. This totally hits home.
68.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
cool stuff! selectable text is a MUST in the browser for me. In clients and apps that do not need that or can provide it themselves, this seems to be a very nice and tiny solution.
69.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
The device updates can be supplied by a supplying service. The device (and its user as the end consumer) is not attacked directly but through its update supply chain. This is why it's called supply chain attack. When somebody intercept
70.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
Non blocking code reviews ftw https://itnext.io/optimizing-the-software-development-proces... Optimizing the Software development process for continuous integration and flow of work https://medium.com/itnext
71.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
IMO the actual experience you want is something as simple as you can do with those old-school simple PHP-based "serverless" web hosters. You just upload your stuff and maybe configure a database URL and that's it. Regarding A
72.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
I prefer this https://blogs.idc.com/2024/10/28/storm-clouds-ahead-missed-e... more nuanced article. I can see how AI workloads makes clouds look expensive.
73.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
IMO this depends on the reading style. "Fold Method Bodies by Default" is something I deactivate immediately. After two decades of reading code, I am optimized to read syntax-highlighted code pretty hard. This just hides the stuff
74.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
Yeah, I was wondering too. I mean those are meant to look scary.
75.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
I can see that this might be very useful, since it is more some kind of application configuration specification that goes far beyond simple flags. In the end the common provider that works securely across all services and clients is probabl
76.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
That's right, and I think Smartphone is actually competing with the good old word Handy, at least in the marketing department. I guess "Ich suche mein Smartphone." sounds somehow too snobbish in most casual contexts.
77.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
> Americentric Swedish Android keyboards are terrible offenders that happily splits words in two. This is how language evolves nowadays. :/
78.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
I would say "Kati's Ecke" (urks) should look modern (and fails at that, looks like cargo cult to me) or is an unintentional error of the owner because they don't know better (maybe obligatory English lessons in school c
79.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
For the record with https://hotwired.dev there is already a rather successful "competitor".
80.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
"HTMX in React" seems to be a very complicated idea. Seems to me like Vaadin territory in terms of complexity. I think you have to embrace the MPA approach otherwise you will not be happy with any MPA technology.
81.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
I totally agree. Even "mere" breast feeding is still full of mysteries that developed during the millions of years of mammal evolution.
82.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
The article reads like it was a bullet point list inflated by AI. But maybe I am just allergic to long texts nowadays. I wonder if we will use AI users to generate mock data and e2e test our applications in the near future. This would proba
83.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
I think there might be a difference between FOSS and closed source software. I tend to agree with the interpretation that swear words are signalling emotional investment. In my experience in closed source software swear words tend to point
84.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
You may want to look at https://roca-style.org/ If you have problems filtering in the backend but it's easy in the frontend your backend technology is probably lacking.
85.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
Do you provide code examples? In my experience the more specific you get with your problem the more specific are the provided solutions (probably a "natural" occurence in LLMs). Hallucianted APIs are sometimes a problem for me, bu
86.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
Göttingen is still a top 200 university, and as far as I remember a talk by Jens Frahm has the highest density of living Nobel Laureates. After the war a famous French singer made a song about Göttingen https://m.youtube.com/
87.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
SQS is not particularly expensive. I don't know where you are getting at. I work on a project with SQS and I worked with RabbitMQ, ArtemisMQ and other MOM technologies as well. At least once delivery is something you can achieve easily
88.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
Tests might be a valid use case, but doesn't seem to be the goal here and there are some solutions out there if you dont want to start a lightweight broker in a container. Why would you want to use the SQS protocol in production withou
89.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
I don't get where you are pointing at. RabbitMQ and other MOMs like Kafka are very versatile. What is the use case for not using SQS right now, but maybe later? And if there is a use case (e.g. production-grade on-premise deployment),
90.
▲
by
chromanoid
2y ago
Could you elaborate why you didn't choose e.g. RabbitMQ? I mean you talk about AMQP and such, it seems to me, that a client-side abstraction would be much more efficient in providing an exit strategy for SQS than creating an SQS "
More ›