christianqchung

9 ms·

121.
by christianqchung 2y ago
What? Presidents from now until forever have that near unlimited legal immunity, regardless of party. That's what the Supreme Court ruled. That question doesn't even make sense to a Democrat supporter, it's not that simple, b
122.
by christianqchung 2y ago
Aye, fair enough. Assuming summarization/shortening or whatever people call this stays the same level of quality, is there an expectation of more interdisciplinary research? I'm unsure about that.
123.
by christianqchung 2y ago
Is that really true? Does it really benefit you much to read essentially unreliable abstracts of 10 papers instead of trying to go through one in detail? Why not just go with the original abstract at that point, or just skim the paper yours
124.
by christianqchung 2y ago
"Donald Trump is going to win. And I'm OK with that." - Jared Golden, Democratic House Representative of Maine I really hoped it wouldn't be so, but anyone that's ever seen Kamala speak will find she is about as com
125.
by christianqchung 2y ago
Goodness, I've been making a joke that AI companies are going to spend 500 billion dollars to make spreadsheet generators since 2023, and now it's becoming real. Gemini has a limited form of this too.
126.
by christianqchung 2y ago
AGI has been achieved internally.
127.
by christianqchung 2y ago
Media narratives and conspiracies are often used interchangeably, I can't read your mind so I included both. Also in your original comment you brought up the media, it's right there, so...
128.
by christianqchung 2y ago
By dominant media narratives you mean a self evident train of scams and security incidents? There's no conspiracy or undue effort to make crypto look bad, that happened in a decentralized manner.
129.
by christianqchung 2y ago
> My parents are. My grand parents are. My neighbours are. My colleagues are. Source? Phishing attempts are lead by spam leading to humans, the limiting factor in scams is not volume of human operators but the relatively small pool of pe
130.
by christianqchung 2y ago
What're they gonna do to harm you with "very powerful" models? Are you with especially gullible or vulnerable to explicit spam? Or are you suggestible to methods of violence that once seen, will make you more likely to carry
131.
by christianqchung 2y ago
Engaging in politics on LinkedIn is kind of psychotic, sorry.
132.
by christianqchung 2y ago
In a few months, or in 18 months? Mira Murati said this month that the next "PhD level intelligence" models will be released in a year or a year and a half. Everything points to GPT-5 not happening this year, especially given that
133.
by christianqchung 2y ago
I'd rather consider the current generation of LLMs as the first iPhone (or maybe flip phone, depends on where you stand), given that hundreds of billions of dollars in private money is already going into developing them.
134.
by christianqchung 2y ago
Didn't read the article I presume.
135.
by christianqchung 2y ago
Yes, I've seen this. Read my comment.
136.
by christianqchung 2y ago
I don't hate this speculation, I just don't buy it at all. 4o's about the same in terms of reasoning as 4. People don't find the text abilities that much more usable over 4 (at least on the LMS leaderboard). It's fa
137.
by christianqchung 2y ago
You made an account just to comment that? Admittedly, it's easier to make a HN account than to sign up for Claude, but still.
138.
by christianqchung 2y ago
This is going nowhere, and all you do in your free time is argue with studies according to your own post history (or do I need to cite a study on this very obvious fact?). In any case I'm assuming you don't believe in sports repor
139.
by christianqchung 2y ago
> Without agreeing or disagreeing with you You disagree, and pretending otherwise is pointless. > Do you not realize how shaky of a claim this is? How many things do you actually verify in your life? That's not how society or fac
140.
by christianqchung 2y ago
Him not replying to you is the funniest tacit admission of being wrong I've ever seen, unless he angrily replies to me. It's surreal that people defend being recorded in your own house. This is figuratively 1984, y'know.
141.
by christianqchung 2y ago
Does anyone know how they're doing the audio part where Mark breaths too hard? Does his breathing get turned into all-caps text (AA EE OO) and that GPT4-o interprets that as him breathing too hard, or is there something more going on?
142.
by christianqchung 2y ago
Speaking of Serial Experiments Lain, there is also the guy walking around the street in the AR headset which everyone thought was weird. Funny that it's still weird 27 years later. I have access to a Vive headset for school project rig
143.
by christianqchung 3y ago
What is strange to you and me is common for hundreds of millions of people. It's strange to me that you're paranoid about touching rice which is going to be boiled for half an hour. You don't wash your hands before cooking? N
144.
by christianqchung 3y ago
>"The Mixtral 8x22b is a state-of-the-art language model that leverages a cutting-edge architecture called Mixture of Experts (MoE). In this setup, the model comprises eight individual "expert" models, each with 7 billion
145.
by christianqchung 3y ago
If you like this idea, read the Fifth Risk by Michael Lewis (he also wrote the Big Short which you may have seen). The book essentially argues that this is already the case in many (crucially not all) government departments. I like to TL;DR
146.
by christianqchung 3y ago
Yes, I see. I wrote ambiguously myself, I meant to say what justifies calling him a snake. I assume that it was past incidents pre-OpenAI involving ycomb and other things? I understand that you feel the mob mentality is unfair and overwhelm
147.
by christianqchung 3y ago
Genuine question, what did he do that was so unforgivable? If it's so obvious, you should be able to list what happened in an unambiguous way.