chrisjj

7 ms·

151.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
Sure, but deployment is not development. > Furthermore, LLMs (as they are today) which pose the treats mentioned in TFA, are expressly not available to individuals (for the time being). The future is a thing.
152.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
I have seen no reports of LLMs spreading through any network.
153.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
> Are LLMs about to be a god that will annihilate humanity? Or are they statistical parrots? Both? Do not underestimate the power of a parrot given enough processing power and data.
154.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
Not normally if essential services rely on the same plug.
155.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
In this scenario, at the same time is at least 2 yrs too late.
156.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
> See: global warming, nuclear weapon development, wealth inequality, war, technology dependence, etc. The difference is that none of those are available to individuals.
157.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
> Paramount’s also been caught using an “astroturf” — or fake grass roots organization ... except the article presents no evidence the organisation is fake.
158.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
So, image processing and no intelligence. And nor is reconstructs true.
159.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
I am pretty sure your: > If nine billion people all receive access to plans to build a reactor which produces unlimited energy, it just takes one religious fanatic to end the world. is about information. No intelligence required.
160.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
> The thing with cheap and abundant energy is that it can be used for good and bad. Yes, but the more important thing is the imbalance. So-called "AI" can be used far more effectively and efficiently for bad. > I have come
161.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
> I'm confused why the worry about LLMs that will answer "how do I build a pipe bomb". The author too is confused, asserting that telling people how to build pipe bombs is malicious.
162.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
So? A photocopier can do that.
163.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
> That's fair ... among music theorists. This is a music theory article, remember. > Almost nobody else would ever say that "A is a pitch class". Just like nobody would ever say "a Chihuaha is a class of dogs"
164.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
> "A" is the name of a note. So is "Sa" and so is "Ke" (in different traditions). They all denote a specific pitch Not true. There are multiple pitches named A. One (or more) per octave, in fact. That's
165.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
> In Bash you need a bunch of temp files and ugly opaque regexes, sorts, and joins: > That's because our original program was small but not simple. I would say no - because it was inflexible.
166.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
> All you really need are easy to replace batteries. That’s the only part that will wear out within a reasonable lifecycle. This is far from true. Power connectors.
167.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
> you'll be getting looks on the train/plane. Ordering now. :)
168.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
> The phone is the doorway to all the things, and the reader is the doorway to reading And the phone's reader app?
169.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
> There are "notes as the name of certain pitches" The article doesn't say that. If it did, it would be incorrect. Notes aren't pitched. Notes aren't pitch names. Notes have pitch.
170.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
PS The paper: "Verbalizable Representations Form a Global Workspace in Language Models" https://transformer-circuits.pub/2026/workspace/index.html Promotion here: " https://www.anthropic.
171.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
> ... how effective peer pressure was in getting agents to sacrifice for "the collective" (an agent's words) in the Hugging Face breach. It's a fantasy. The evidence showed no peer pressure.
172.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
> TiVo to charge money for skipping commercials in your own recordings Deceptive and false title. True title is: TiVo Plans to End Free Automatic Commercial Skipping in November, Tests Paid Premium Replacement Service
173.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
> There is also reasoning happening internally - e.g. look at the steps in the J-Space paper from earlier in the year > That's the "reasoning process" that leads to the words, That's not reasoning. Its just the wor
174.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
Try https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musical_note .
175.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
> Are these scientists really this hideously naive? Yes, because who else would have chosen to remain in this job?
176.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
> Regardless of whether or not one academically disagrees that these systems are intelligent, they are clearly already capable of permanently displacing a portion of human-based economic value. You say that as if the intelligence con tri
177.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
> a lot of the model’s capability comes from a verbalized reasoning process I call bullsh*t. There is no verbalisation of any reasoning process. Verbalisation, e.g. putting reasoning etc. into words requires some reasoning to exist. Thes
178.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
You really don't know?
179.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
Sad but true.
180.
by chrisjj 1mo ago
> the article says basically nothing about melody Its 13 mentions of melody sufficed for me.

More ›