chrisjj

25 ms·

931.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
And this guy still calls it A I .
932.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
Too late. I did that years ago!
933.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
I think the fact 4chan instructed a lawyer shows it does.
934.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
> the leadership is banned from entering the UK for the foreseeable future Not at all. But if they do enter, they might find difficulty leaving.
935.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
Odds of collecting some 4chan execs travelling abroad are a lot higher, though
936.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
> 4Chan operates in the US And the UK... each time it delivers there.
937.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
[delayed]
938.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
> Or are these people actually that stupid? Or simply they judge enough of their readers to be that stupid.
939.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
But will those places accept it unscanned? I imagine there's a staff trust issue here.
940.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
a lawyer representing the company - which has previously said it won't pay such fines - has responded to the demand with an AI-generated cartoon image of a hamster.
941.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
That vagueness is clearly designed to disguise the truth, being "going to his own company's dashboard and trying to view another which he didn't own and pressing the back key four times" https://www.bbc.co.uk&
942.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
No. We've seen nothing as extreme as this Governmental "AI" delusion since Lysenkoist vitalism. And look where that ended up.
943.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
Only technically possible, so not so bad. /i And more weasel words at: The issue could only have been exploited by a logged-in user performing a specific set of actions. At this stage, we have no confirmed reports of any data having
944.
'Alright mate?': Amazon pins UK hopes on AI upgrade of Alexa(theguardian.com)
3 points by chrisjj 8mo ago|0 comments
945.
UK to examine labelling AI content among wider copyright reforms(reuters.com)
2 points by chrisjj 8mo ago|0 comments
946.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
This Govt's serious problem is it has fallen hook line and sinker for the "AI" con trick. It thought shafting the creatives a price worth paying for a place on the "AI" gravy train. It still has no idea how deluded
947.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
Too much so for this government. Their plan was to change the law to remove creator rights regarding theft, sorry, use by "AI".
948.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
Krikorian also raises a troubling point about Tesla’s data practices. The car constantly logs the driver’s hand position, reaction time, and eye tracking, and Tesla has used this data after crashes to shift blame onto drivers. Meanwhile, d
949.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
True and far more interesting title: Former Uber self-driving chief crashes his Tesla on FSD, exposes supervision problem
950.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
What took them so long?
951.
Does "AI" cause delusion, or just attract those aleady suffering?
6 points by chrisjj 8mo ago|0 comments
952.
Government backtracks on AI and copyright after outcry from major artists(bbc.co.uk)
34 points by chrisjj 8mo ago|10 comments
953.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
Degraded is an unfortunate choice of word in this case.
954.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
> The tool passes answers through a verification layer designed to detect and correct errors and hallucinations Call us back when the verification layer is verified to detect errors and hallucinations.
955.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
> Like every other tool, AI is a multiplier of operator skill Myth. What "AI" is, is a mulitiplier of operator output rate.
956.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
> I don’t think the objective was to get a plausible count, The only failure identified was "failing to arrive at a plausible count". > says accuracy was one of the categories they looked at That what it says . But what it
957.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
The difference between right and sounds right probably should change your approach. There's a reason you don't see humans wearing badges "Warning. Humans can make mistakes".
958.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
> "the performance of the object detection model was poor when applied to Giant's Causeway footage, failing to arrive at a plausible count" Interesting to see that the objective was a plausible count rather than an accurat
959.
by chrisjj 8mo ago
> That is one of the most common misconceptions about AI agents. People assume the model understands the business. It does not. It understands language. "It understands language" is the most common misconception about "AI&
960.
Close Brothers banking group to cut 600 jobs and roll out AI 'at pace'(theguardian.com)
4 points by chrisjj 8mo ago|0 comments

More ›