chrisjj

24 ms·

751.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
> The company may still learn almost nothing. Not a problem if the hired "AI" now does that job. /i
752.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
> A 4 GiB model has nothing to do with the functionality of a web browser. Problem is, nor do half its T&Cs. What we thought was a web browser turns out to be a Google content delivery vehicle - and controlled by Google, not the targ
753.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
Its a salesman's foot in the door, except its near-invisible and gets to walk round your house.
754.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
> No, this is not true. The large requirement comes after a user wants to use the feature, The feature that didn't say it would cost you 4Gb, right?
755.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
> "Silently installs" is misleading. They are including a file in the package which is presumably related to the functionality of the software. Related... to the functionality of feeding the same profit and loss account, right?
756.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
> LLMs running on my laptop can drive coding agents now Coo. How did it evade your anti-malware?
757.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
The value of prompt injection tools just rocketed.
758.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
> We should make an alternative git site, but how to acquire users? Buy ad space on Github's outage page?
759.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
Bathroom usage.
760.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
Required reading: The Circle by Dave Eggers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Circle_(Eggers_novel)
761.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
Seriously, what took so long?
762.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
> We train LLMs like insects LLMs are nothing like insects. Insects learn. LLMs don't.
763.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
> A proper developer policy page would fix this. And that's why don't get one.
764.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
> The poor communication and flip-flopping are what concern me. There's no poor communication. The communication is excellently crafted to deceive users and facilitate flipflopping.
765.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
No metaphor. Literally a simile.
766.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
Nope. But someone smart enough could.
767.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
> They really need to figure out the rules A company built groundup on rule-breaking? Ain't gonna happen.
768.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
> Until then, it's hard to know where you stand with using their products. Working As Designed, clearly.
769.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
> We train LLMs like dogs No we don't. Untrained dogs are intelligent.
770.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
Error. When code is free, technical debt is free. Instead try Code is free, quality isn’t.
771.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
Of course not. One of the major differences between intelligent and word-guessing autocomplete.
772.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
"Autocomplete" is noy an abstraction level. It is the actual programmed behaviour.
773.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
They ingest text written in first and third person and regurgitate in first person only, right?
774.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
My point was more: will it stop the user closing it?
775.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
> How should it decide whether your prompt is actually interesting novel exploration of an unknown concept or just complete bogus? It shouldn't. It should just do what it is told.
776.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
> it breaks my code, tests start to fail and it instantly says “these are all pre existing failures” and moves on like nothing happened Reminds us of the most important button the "AI" has, over the similarly bad human employee
777.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
> ... or simply gave up when the problem was too hard, More of that please. Perhaps on a check box, "[x] Less bullsh*t".
778.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
> “Palantir’s manifesto, which embraces AI state surveillance of citizens along with national service in the USA, is either a parody of a RoboCop film, or a disturbing narcissistic rant from an arrogant organisation,” Why not both?
779.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
Your phone manufacturer loves you.
780.
by chrisjj 6mo ago
> Maps needs to be paid for You paid for it - when you bought the only phone brand that ships it. Will you enjoy your phone's call screen when it starts popping up ads for things you just spoke about?

More ›