Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
chrisjj
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
481.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
> A system with these agents rummaging around for a while will be much more secure than one without. True. There'll be no breakins at a nuclear power plant in meltdown.
482.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
> They also have examples from the AI's reasoning train of thought PR bullsh*t. There's no thought in a stochastic parrot.
483.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
> where that behavior was never even intended. Says who?
484.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
> Those safety behaviors are added much later in the process. A.k.a. Ready Fire Aim.
485.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
True title: ‘I hate what AI is doing to the minds and happiness of the young’: Katherine Rundell on the view from the classroom
486.
▲
'I hate what AI is doing to the minds and happiness of the young'
(theguardian.com)
7 points
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
|
1 comments
487.
▲
The Zero-Click Economy: Why 60% of Searches End Without a Click
(forbes.com)
4 points
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
|
1 comments
488.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
True title: The Zero-Click Economy: Why 60% Of Searches End Without A Click And What CEOs Should Do About It
489.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
> even if it is ironic that Oracle is all in on AI Selling it is one thing. Having to use it one's self is quite another.
490.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
> The third symptom is the most insidious: trusting AI’s judgement over your people’s. This might actually be an improvement. Execs gulled by "AI" are surely the ones likely to have the worst judgement in hiring people.
491.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
UK included.
492.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
> This article is too inward Too inward for what?
493.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
> The "harm" alleged could be produced not only by any social media, but by any mass media When did you last see an addictive newspaper?
494.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
Nice, but > trims the stray trailing \r that malformed input likes to leave behind how does this distinguisg the non-stray variety?
495.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
Thanks. I got a bar with: A Subscription Is Required to Continue Reading. Then I deleted cookies, and now that's gone.
496.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
Paywalled.
497.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
Nice idea, but ... > reading stop · press Space to hold it here ... what 'Space'? On phone.
498.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
Is this creeping brand rep protection? Rather like Meta glasses' recording warning LED.
499.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
Nope. "Dress made of living mycelium can renew and repair itself".
500.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
> nutrient solution is applied over a hole, along with a small patch of fresh fungus So, not repair itself.
501.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
Yes, the fine print. Only this so-called "AI" needs it full size on the front page.
502.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
> Customers tolerate weird interfaces, pointless features, strange bugs, systems held together by generated code nobody actually understands. And that's this "AI"tool too. Garbage in, garbage out, as we say.
503.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
> This is not a new concept and it’s not an idea the LLM companies invented. I don't recall any prior computer software working so badly that it needed a disclaimer like "Claude is AI and can make mistakes" on its front pa
504.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
> this is more like going through Stack Overflow and answering the most upvoted issues that don't have answers. Except OpenAI isn't showing any upvotes.
505.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
Plus this rot has extended to true search engines too. A recent Google blurb on new "AI" features of Google web search kicks of with the following misrep: "The goal of Search has always been simple: to help you ask anything
506.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
Note that most of the complaints are his art looks like AI art. That's very different from it being AI-generated.
507.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
> The problem is that the crackpots are out there writing, and this is snarfed into the training data. No, the problem is the chatbot pretends to be an AI answer engine. Recognise it is simply a zero-intelligence search engine, and you&#
508.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
I did read the article. It does not answer the question.
509.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
> Doesn’t the M stand for Material? Yes. So? > What are you saying the difference is? Child sexual exploitation content is broader.
510.
▲
by
chrisjj
3mo ago
Seems they've mistaken child pornography (as per the US legal definition) as CSAM.
More ›