chr15m

12 ms·

211.
by chr15m 8mo ago
That's a good point. Myself is the easiest person to fool. I knocked together a quick analysis of my commit graphs going back several years, if you're interested: https://mccormick.cx/gh/ My average leading u
212.
by chr15m 8mo ago
I am constantly getting LLMs to change features and fix bugs. The key is to micromanage the LLM and its context, and read the changes. It's slower that vibe coding but faster than coding by hand, and it results in working, maintainable
213.
by chr15m 8mo ago
Sorry about the sarcasm in my reply. I guess what I am saying is at the end of the day you need the program to do the thing. Whatever mutation it needs to do to accomplish the task, that's what you're going to allow. That's e
214.
by chr15m 8mo ago
I am sure Google would never deprecate a piece of software lots of people depend upon. https://killedbygoogle.com/
215.
by chr15m 8mo ago
I'm sure that would work just like how phone apps asking for permission to do each thing has resulted in no phone user ever getting pwned and doxxed by their apps - phone apps are completely safe now, yay!
216.
by chr15m 8mo ago
> companies always find new and exciting ways to disappoint you So true. This is how history will remember our age.
217.
by chr15m 8mo ago
The best way to get JSON back is function calling.
218.
by chr15m 8mo ago
This rules. Godspeed!
219.
by chr15m 8mo ago
The golden age is over.
220.
by chr15m 8mo ago
No corporation wants your kids to use their platforms less. Zero incentive for them to fix this. Parents are at war with corporations. We must hold the line.
221.
by chr15m 8mo ago
Bring back sortition, within elected parties.
222.
by chr15m 8mo ago
And worse, it says something smart people wish was true.
223.
by chr15m 8mo ago
Ah ok. If you do run it again that would be a worthwhile change. I know I personally have biases about models and I have seen others commenting the same - it seems likely it would skew the results at least a little. Nonetheless you've
224.
by chr15m 8mo ago
Ah interesting. Thank you very much for sharing the illuminating results. One question I had - was the judgement blinded? Did judges know which models produced which output?
225.
by chr15m 8mo ago
If you view LLM driven dev as a kind of evolutionary process rather than an engineering process (at the level of a single LLM output) then this makes a lot of sense. You're widening the population from which you select for fitness.
226.
by chr15m 8mo ago
The openrouter/free endpoint may make your dog unfit. You're welcome. Sorry doggo.
227.
Platforms should publish search data(mccormick.cx)
2 points by chr15m 8mo ago|0 comments
228.
by chr15m 9mo ago
Thanks for pointing out those follow ups. Interesting stuff! > correct and uncontraversial From the original quote it is clear he was referring to the idea of aliens being detectable by infrared because they will absorb all of their sun&
229.
by chr15m 9mo ago
Dyson's paper was literally written in jest.
230.
by chr15m 9mo ago
I don't mean to sound like I'm demanding this. I'm saying you will get better outcomes if you choose to do this as a developer. You're right it's an interesting problem that seems fun to work on. Hopefully we'l
231.
by chr15m 9mo ago
> I would prefer to let the agent do whatever they want Lol, good luck to you!
232.
by chr15m 9mo ago
It took me a minute to realise you were joking too! :)
233.
by chr15m 9mo ago
Thanks!
234.
by chr15m 9mo ago
The harness runs the tool call for the LLM. It is trivial to not run the tool call without approval, and many existing tools do this.
235.
by chr15m 9mo ago
Yep. The agent CLIs have the wrong level of abstraction. Needs more human in the loop.
236.
by chr15m 9mo ago
Approval should be mandatory for any non-read tool call. You should read everything your LLM intends to do, and approve it manually. "But that is annoying and will slow me down!" Yes, and so will recovering from disastrous tool ca
237.
by chr15m 9mo ago
Ha ha NGU!
238.
by chr15m 9mo ago
Agree. I'm curious about the human contribution baseline.
239.
by chr15m 9mo ago
How did they know it was not LLM generated?
240.
by chr15m 9mo ago
People here are claiming that this is true of humans as well. Apart from the fact that bad content can be generated much faster with LLMs, what's your feeling about that criticism? It's there any measure of how many submissions be

More ›