chr15m

3 ms·

31.
by chr15m 18d ago
For sure LLMs will be used more and more.
32.
by chr15m 18d ago
> Many humans have studied robots play chess and learned from them. Yes, robot chess is very useful for chess players. It's a great technology. People don't want to watch robot chess. They want to watch humans, even those who u
33.
by chr15m 18d ago
> Hermeneutics is a legitimate method of scientific inquiry. Whatever the non-fiction equivalent of this is, maybe that's what smart, curious humans will do in the future. Human mathematicians will explore the findings of AI researc
34.
by chr15m 18d ago
They used to call this a computer virus.
35.
by chr15m 19d ago
> I haven’t fully verified the proof; I worked through it with Claude Fable and it passes the sniff test, but fully digesting it will take a bit more energy than I have right now. This is overlooked but really important. Nobody wants to
36.
by chr15m 19d ago
> Content is not my forte The way to get good at something is by doing it a lot. "Four things, running here" This made me want to close the tab. Take some time to think about what you've built and explain it in your own wo
37.
by chr15m 20d ago
The most Hacker News thing ever is top comments haggling over the order of the list.
38.
by chr15m 20d ago
The way back always seems shorter that the way there. That's because you've already seen everything on the way there. Neuroscience says novelty, plus attention, plus later retrieval are what slow down subjective perception of time
39.
by chr15m 20d ago
Thank you for this reminder. This is probably only a short few years away for me.
40.
by chr15m 21d ago
https://twiiit.com
41.
by chr15m 21d ago
Most democracy measurement projects and indices have shown a decline in democratic performance for the US over the past decade. EIU reclassified the country from "full democracy" to "flawed democracy" in 2016. V-Dem went
42.
by chr15m 21d ago
Aider pioneered this with the "repo map" which works tremendously well.
43.
by chr15m 22d ago
I don't mean the services I mean the governments.
44.
by chr15m 22d ago
> the most you lose Yep that's the only thing you lose, apart from a huge number of literal images of kids in the hands of literal criminals. > I don't see any other better alternatives Not doing age verification!
45.
by chr15m 22d ago
The prisoner did not really "escape" because: - They really wanted to leave. - We made prison difficult and annoying. - We didn't build a perfect prison.
46.
by chr15m 23d ago
"I do what is mine to do; the rest doesn't disturb me." "No matter what anyone says or does, my task is to be good." "It is not the [hu]man who has too little, but the [hu]man who craves more, that is poor.&quo
47.
by chr15m 26d ago
It doesn't matter what the hash is if it is inherently cheaper for a bot farm to compute the hashes than it is for a human to do it on their device. The human pays a greater cost in annoyance, wasted time, battery, and that means the P
48.
by chr15m 26d ago
Yep, all security is about making attack more expensive than defense. If they have a farm of other people's devices, as alleged in the article, then it costs them less to calculate PoW than it costs ordinary users. Ordinary users have
49.
by chr15m 26d ago
Monero is fine with making people wait, that's literally the whole basis of mining blocks in "crypto currency". It's tuned to the time required. Anubis wants "slow for bots but fast for humans" which is not pos
50.
by chr15m 28d ago
No, companies can do whatever they want. They shouldn't be forced to support all models. I'm suggesting you shouldn't let a company dictate which models you use. Putting yourself in a position where they can is detrimental, b
51.
by chr15m 28d ago
OP said: > as a Cursor and Claude subscriber, but not an OpenAI subscriber, this will push me back to Anthropic Instead of deciding based on the merits of the model, they are being pushed by the actions of the companies. You should be ab
52.
by chr15m 28d ago
The reason it makes sense is because different models are better at different things. Allowing yourself to be locked in to a particular model by these companies is a bad idea and will lead to worse outcomes for yourself and the market as a
53.
by chr15m 28d ago
Why would you possibly allow companies to push you? You are the customer and you should control which models you use.
54.
by chr15m 28d ago
Allowing the company or harness to dictate which models you use is crazy.
55.
by chr15m 28d ago
It's absolutely incredible!
56.
by chr15m 29d ago
Yes. Maybe we're going back to the old ways of life and social structures, but now with robots to help. Who needs states and cities when you can have everything you need without them? Absolutely right about war and technology too. Also
57.
by chr15m 29d ago
> we now have superintelligence Wait what?
58.
by chr15m 1mo ago
The general rule: any social media owned by a corporation will eventually lock posts behind a login.
59.
by chr15m 1mo ago
IPFS did not lose all funding. Please check your facts. IPFS has largely failed to find adoption as a protocol because it was over engineered and did not give users what they want. People don't want decentralization. What they want is
60.
by chr15m 1mo ago
By seeding relay lists widely. This is the "bootstrap problem" faced by all p2p networks. NIP65 suggests spreading relay lists widely and to "pay attention" to popular relays: > Clients SHOULD spread an author's

More ›