choward

12 ms·

91.
by choward 5y ago
This is inexcusable. Just cancelled my YouTube premium subscription. All they did was play a clip from CPAC. I wish nothing but the worst for Google.
92.
by choward 5y ago
> Now, just wait, ideally 10+ years, before looking into your account again That might not be the best idea because of escheat. Here's a story about someone who didn't check on their stocks for years and the state claimed them.
93.
by choward 5y ago
That's because it's really just a standard commodity.
94.
by choward 5y ago
Because profit. What more is there to say?
95.
by choward 5y ago
Interesting tax evasion idea but the thing I don't get is who they would donate it to. Would they set up some fake non-profit? Otherwise who would take it? I'm sure the first thing a non profit would do is try to sell it to conver
96.
by choward 5y ago
> Spikes—wearing the standard black turtleneck, jeans, and tennis shoes associated with Steve Jobs and Elizabeth Holmes—announced that MoviePass is moving towards a system where people watch ads to earn virtual currency that they then sp
97.
by choward 5y ago
I am.
98.
by choward 5y ago
No. I'm upset by lame uninteresting HN content.
99.
by choward 5y ago
I don't get it. What is this other than a Nike ad?
100.
by choward 5y ago
I never claimed Russia was a good actor. But I need to see since real actual evidence before I believe anything.
101.
by choward 5y ago
They're critical at the surface but when it comes to the government's cute agents they are in lock step. They're really pushing anti Russia propaganda right now for example.
102.
by choward 5y ago
> We don’t have a state media, and I guarantee you that whatever corruption people know about, there is some media member talking about it. You can't be that naive. You think every piece of corruption has been exposed? Usually when
103.
by choward 5y ago
We'd have every movement that could possibly benefit people infiltrated by the FBI. They would pose as Nazis during protests or try to instigate people to break the law in order to illegitmize the movement. Then we'd have a govern
104.
by choward 5y ago
I can't tell if this is satire but if it isn't it's spreading a bunch of misinformation and non proven claims. This entire point seems to just be calling for censorship if it isn't satire.
105.
by choward 5y ago
This reminds me of the controversy with Brave browser.
106.
by choward 5y ago
Yeah. I'd rather have something handheld with as much freedom as a standard computer than a smartphone. Unfortunately that doesn't exist in a fully usable form yet so I'm stuck with a smartphone for now. I plan on eventually
107.
by choward 5y ago
> But if you still see a huge problem, just get your correct model, back your results with data and enjoy getting the Nobel prize. The "Nobel prize" for economics isn't a real Nobel prize. It was made up to make economists
108.
by choward 5y ago
Not cool. I own the NFT for the word "no". Unfortunately I can't do anything about it since NFTs are worthless.
109.
by choward 5y ago
This would be a great idea if our government wasn't complete corrupt and we could trust it. I find it hard to believe that the people pushing it are acting in good faith.
110.
by choward 5y ago
Mobile apps are a privacy nightmare. No thanks.
111.
by choward 5y ago
AWS shut them down. It took them a while to get up and running again and they lost a lot of users.
112.
by choward 5y ago
I was confused by the use of fungibility too. But if bitcoins can be traced they're no longer the same as every other Bitcoin. They're history makes them unique. Therefore they might be valued differently or because workers based
113.
by choward 5y ago
Is scary how many people think like you. The Whitehouse is constantly pushing for censorship across all tech companies and platforms. AWS even cancelled an entire platform, parlor. Sure there are platforms to move to now but we're head
114.
by choward 5y ago
Cool, so are you for or against censorship? And I don't know about you but I like listening to people I disagree with. I don't like living in an echo chamber and don't want to send "conspiracy theorists" to a differ
115.
by choward 5y ago
ITT: people who think that this isn't government censorship even though the Whitehouse called for the censorship.
116.
by choward 5y ago
Ironically, Barbra Streisand pulled her content from Spotify.
117.
by choward 5y ago
Just curious, how exactly is that FUD? It's not the F, the U or the D.
118.
by choward 5y ago
You're literally stating something as a fact that you have no evidence of. Sounds like misinformation to me.
119.
by choward 5y ago
> has a provable impact on the healthcare system which forces our governments to ask us to endure more restrictions than would be necessary if vaccine hesitancy wasn't a thing It's exactly this kind of misinformation that leads
120.
by choward 5y ago
> doesn't mean we have to actively promote widely debunked crap If it's so widely debunked then why do you care? Should be easy to shoot down on a debate. Oh and you don't have to listen.

More ›