chopin24

7 ms·

31.
by chopin24 6y ago
Should the US government make its own social network? That would cut off all kinds of issues. Only content that is literally illegal would be removed. Everyone would be guaranteed access.
32.
by chopin24 6y ago
That’s not the case for states with Net Neutrality laws, according to the article. For the state of Washington, this move is illegal.
33.
by chopin24 6y ago
>If a totally unmoderated platform isn’t overrun with spam yet, that just means it isn’t popular enough for spammers to notice it. This is my wish. For a social network that isn't popular enough for spammers to notice it. I'm a
34.
by chopin24 6y ago
Can we now see how many users there actually were, and how many were in the US? Because there's no shortage of troll farm companies that exist solely to get people riled up.
35.
by chopin24 6y ago
People develop algorithms. They aren't some neutral force of nature, like a tornado. These are choices.
36.
by chopin24 6y ago
You don’t think it’s more likely that a person who talked about fishing also searched for fishing gear using Google? Or “Likes” fishing on Facebook? Or follows a fishing person on Twitter? The technology and storage that would be required t
37.
by chopin24 6y ago
>If having the wrong opinion means you can get your bank accounts and all Internet presence removed from you, it's not any different than living under a fascist government. Calling for the overthrow of the government through violent
38.
by chopin24 6y ago
>Why not? That would amount to involuntary servitude, which is not permitted by the 13th Amendment. Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted,