choo-t

6 ms·

31.
by choo-t 3mo ago
>But how do you do it in a way that it isn’t a burden on the parents Why should we aim to do that ? Who give internet-enables device to their children? In most cases, who give pay for their internet access? > So how to solve it. And „
32.
by choo-t 3mo ago
> Moreover, what I observed is that urban professional class populations are usually way more in favor of wolves reintroduction than rural working class population. Perhaps their reasons is an economic one (wolf attacks on livestock) and
33.
by choo-t 4mo ago
Multiple proposal for this exist for decades[1][2] The RTA one was even pushed by the porn industry and is already in place in majors websites[3] [1]: https://www.rtalabel.org/ [2]: https://icra.org/webmasters
34.
by choo-t 4mo ago
> Indeed but you are the one who claimed it was not a hard problem. Am I ?
35.
by choo-t 4mo ago
Well, they could trade identifying ones too or even stollen ID cards if you want to go this way. They could also trade porn-filled thumb drive or old-school glossy paper magazine. There no way to prevent kid's exposure to stuff at a 10
36.
by choo-t 4mo ago
> For 15k you could run the best open source models (that would require 200k in hardware to run) 24/7 at 50 tps for like 5 years straight. Is this assuming no price increase and no throttling ?
37.
by choo-t 4mo ago
> It could, of course, use a double-anonymous system like the French one. Which isn't really anonymous or privacy preserving, despite it's funny name : https://broken-by-design.fr/posts/proto-authz-porn&#x2
38.
by choo-t 4mo ago
Supporting very old hardwares and supporting less than a decade old softwares are two very different things.
39.
by choo-t 5mo ago
Oh yes, the Four Horsemen of the Infocalypse. Better to wiretap everyone just in case. Why stop there ? After all there a chance any privacy could be used to conceal some terrorist plot, better to record every meat-space conversations too,
40.
by choo-t 5mo ago
You don't have to donate to all of them, or even donate at all as long as enough people donate. They tend to feature a call to donation instead of advertising, with prominent progress bar about how much they need this month/semest
41.
by choo-t 5mo ago
Donation.
42.
by choo-t 5mo ago
> Generally speaking, that's incorrect. That's like saying "I don't like cars, and don't see the value in cars, therefore the market for cars is fraudulent". It's arguable that the car market is indeed
43.
by choo-t 5mo ago
Vast majority of developers/studios don't use any DRM at all.
44.
by choo-t 5mo ago
Having the game wishlisted is a signal of players waiting for a sale, or future patches/correction, or simply not bothering to cleanup wishlist, not a signal of someone is eager to pirate the game.
45.
by choo-t 5mo ago
The number of pirated copies doesn't translate to missed sales. Someone playing/watching/listening to something for free doesn't mean they would still do it if they had to pay for it.
46.
by choo-t 6mo ago
> Are in tension with one another. Clause 1 opens up for the idea that there exists valid "non-surveillance" record keeping, and that the distinction of such record keeping from surveillance requires determination of consent an
47.
by choo-t 6mo ago
Are you equaling mass surveillance to a doctor keeping track of your health for diagnostic accuracy purpose ? Concerning the railway example, they only need to store how much I owe them, not my travels. Storing travel history on their end i
48.
by choo-t 6mo ago
The problem is not about the data being correct or not, it's about its existence in the first place. Why would you correct data about you very own surveillance ?
49.
by choo-t 6mo ago
> You don't have to replace the phone. You can go to some repair shop and get the battery replaced. It will be several times cheaper than a new phone. Still way more expensive than swapping a battery pack, and this mean leaving your
50.
by choo-t 6mo ago
> From an environmental point of view it doesn't matter if you do the repair yourself or you have it done by someone else. The added cost and friction will de facto make it less repairable.
51.
by choo-t 6mo ago
Which is the majority of the users[1], even more if you count that any user without age-check won't be able to access your game either. [1]: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1190869/roblox-games-use...
52.
by choo-t 6mo ago
Pretty sure that if they could they would, but browsers sandboxing security prevent this to go unnoticed.
53.
by choo-t 7mo ago
First, you got it for yourself, so you chose to use a jukebox (or in other words : restrict your listening to specific titles on physical media) instead to impose it to other, which make a big difference in what people see as a restrictions
54.
by choo-t 7mo ago
Does their Zimbra implementation support 2FA ?
55.
by choo-t 7mo ago
Specifically designed to be less capable is the same as being restricted. It's purpose is explicitly to restrict the user communication to some predefined setting by a third party (the parent and company behind it) and the user is well
56.
by choo-t 7mo ago
> What's going to happen immediately is that kids with equivalent phones will compare, realize that one has a lot of restrictions and the other doesn't, and it becomes a nightmare. They know that all you need to do is unlock it
57.
by choo-t 7mo ago
> I think you're missing that circumventing paywalls is unlawful in most parts of the world. And a necessity if you want to archive the content correctly, also necessary if you want the archives to be publicly available.
58.
by choo-t 7mo ago
Like most companies or state ? As an individual, keeping their identity private is the only way to prevent oppression.
59.
by choo-t 7mo ago
> But declaring the situation to simply be a facade to harvest people’s data seems to me like a reflexive response to avoid uncomfortable truths regarding the situation. Well, your example wouldn't be solved by age verification in a
60.
by choo-t 7mo ago
> The age verification bills I've read have steep penalties for retaining information, so that seems fine since that's literally more protection than you get in person. The best way (and only way) to prevent retaining informati

More ›