chmod775

28 ms·

541.
by chmod775 2y ago
Sure, but here's some examples that may be worth a lot of money to the right person, or can just cause a lot of harm: - Regime critics with a channel on YT. - Vulnerable individuals and others trying to keep their identity a secret. Pu
542.
by chmod775 2y ago
This will enable you to get the private e-mail of the google account that owns the channel, which is not necessarily the same one a channel may give away publicly. So for some channels that provided no contact information, you now can acq
543.
by chmod775 2y ago
There is often phishing campaigns targeting larger channels on YT, trying to trick someone with access to it into opening malicious e-mail attachments, with the end-goal of taking over the channel. Usually the attackers then put a livestrea
544.
by chmod775 2y ago
Fraunhofer must've taken a quite a hit to their budget, or so I thought, but it turns out that revenue from MP3 licensing was only about ~100 million EUR annually. Seems the license came quite cheap anyways.
545.
by chmod775 2y ago
> Objects are extremely good at what they're good at. Blind devotion to functional is dumb. Maybe "mutable objects"? Maybe these were intended to be isolated statements? Personally I believe functional programming is great
546.
by chmod775 2y ago
You could try to airdop them to wherever they are needed. Worked for Idaho: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beaver_drop This article has a video: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/oct&#x2
547.
by chmod775 2y ago
Why?
548.
by chmod775 2y ago
Isn't there a likely faster analytical solution? At least I think sqrt, sin, and cos are generally considered to be slow. Maybe this: 1. Generate random X [-1 to 1] 2. Based on X you can calculate a range of legal Y that will still fal
549.
by chmod775 2y ago
Absolute rubbish. There's lots of factual information here you can know and use to make informed "guesses" (if you will). People like Musk, who are often absolutely clueless about countries' political situations, the
550.
by chmod775 2y ago
Chances are with that number of trees affected, some would turn out to be resistant or immune and produce offspring that is as well. Surely they didn't plant a states' worth of genetically near-identical trees, right? Right? Edit
551.
by chmod775 2y ago
You're going to die if you're around to witness either (if you didn't already pass out from smoke/heat/lack of oxygen). It literally doesn't matter. The advantage of suburbs in which houses are mostly built fro
552.
by chmod775 2y ago
"other construction material more fire resistant than plywood box held together by spit and prayer" How interesting. In all seriousness you could make a home from almost anything else and it would end up being more fire resistant.
553.
by chmod775 2y ago
That's a bit light on details. Here's an account by king Sennacherib: > I destroyed the city and its houses, from foundation to parapet; I devastated and burned them. I razed the brick and earthenwork of the outer and inner wal
554.
by chmod775 2y ago
On the time scales the article uses (going back all the way to the neolithic age), all of the examples you used are essentially the present. Also the first thing that comes to mind for many people when they think "migrant" will pa
555.
by chmod775 2y ago
> In case of destruction, the satellite breaks up into many individual pieces each having a potentially very different orbit. Depends on what you mean with "potentially very different orbit". Each piece still has to be at least
556.
by chmod775 2y ago
Here's a selection: - "The left" will try to deceive and deny reality even in the face of hard numbers. Obviously way more people migrate nowadays than historically. Most of the historic migration was also between geographica
557.
by chmod775 2y ago
I get what this article is trying to do, but it is likely to achieve the opposite. This is not going to succeed in pulling the wool over anyone's eyes, because it goes directly against most people's first-hand observed reality. To
558.
by chmod775 2y ago
Didn't do it for me while in Europe. I thought it might behave differently if I pretend to be from the US using a VPN etc. Nope. Searched "Google" both times, didn't happen either time. Then I tried putting "google&
559.
by chmod775 2y ago
Saving $1000 for only a ~25-30% hit in rasterization perf is going to be worth it for a lot of people.
560.
by chmod775 2y ago
I for one don't like the DLSS/TAA look at all. Between the lack of sharpness, motion blur and ghosting, I don't understand how people can look at that and consider it an upgrade. Let's not even get into the horror that i
561.
by chmod775 2y ago
> will be two times faster [...] thanks to DLSS 4 Translation: No significant actual upgrade. Sounds like we're continuing the trend of newer generations being beaten on fps/$ by the previous generations while hardly pushing th
562.
by chmod775 2y ago
I've read this comment multiple times and now I'm greatly confused because it does not appear to be meant humorously.
563.
by chmod775 2y ago
Why even obsess over how others ought to get stuff done? Judge the results.
564.
by chmod775 2y ago
That's a questionable thing to say on a page where a decent amount of users got into coding at around age 13. Sure, tech literacy has taken a massive step back, but given how easy modern consumer VPNs are to use, I don't doubt mos
565.
by chmod775 2y ago
I had to fill in like 5 fields (who, what, bank account) in a 2-page form to start a basic business in Germany of all places - and was legally allowed to start operating the moment I submitted that. It cost nothing and I received a tax ID a
566.
by chmod775 2y ago
Ethics is the study of morality. And while you're correct that people have subjective ideas of morality, it absolutely does not matter for the sake of this conversation. You are detracting. Just because in some place a practice is cons
567.
by chmod775 2y ago
> And yeah, when it comes to talking about things being discussed in the Public Square in America, the ethical standard should also be American. I strongly take issue with this. The morality of something does not change based on where it
568.
by chmod775 2y ago
> I guess you're just unaccustomed to America's loooooooooooooooooooongstanding free speech regs. I'm reasonably certain that I know the extents of what you can and can't legally say in the US better than most people
569.
by chmod775 2y ago
It is. Comparatively it is even very common in most of the Anglosphere, however not for lack of trying by more ethical journalists. If you search for "the juvenile suspect" on google news, you'll get plenty of hits for US new
570.
by chmod775 2y ago
Likely 18 and 19 when most of this happened, but him barely not being legally considered a minor doesn't make the ethics of this much better.

More ›