chipsrafferty

7 ms·

61.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
If you take any trade that is supposedly 1:1 you are not bright because there is no reason to do it.
62.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
Dollars, too.
63.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
This is true of US dollars too, it's just a matter of scale. US dollars are certainly worth less if they have a shady transaction history. That's why money laundering exists - I will pay you $100,000 in dirty money if you give me
64.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
Ok so just round it down then
65.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
Search hasn't worked for years now.
66.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
It's not even "a thing being a person", this is just dumbing down the situation. A boat is not a person. A boat is not a person "legally speaking", either. A boat has some of the same rights that people have.
67.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
Ads should be illegal.
68.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
They don't care. There's a ridiculous amount of AI slop on YouTube.
69.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
With so many sites refusing to serve you without an ad blocker, is there any solution?
70.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
What? Progressives are the ones worried the world is going to end from climate change.
71.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
10% of all of Meta's income is from scammers.
72.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
Children are free
73.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
It's adorable that you think every company actually abides by these rules. There have been class action lawsuits recently against the largest tech companies. Why wouldn't the smaller ones break the rules too? It's akin to ch
74.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
I'd pay for it if I could somehow know that they also deleted all the data they tracked in the past (impossible since they already sold it 100x)
75.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
It would conceivably be possible to have a lot of physical states. That doesn't mean that they are actually possible from our current state and rewrite rules. So it's not actually a given that it can be built just because it&#x2
76.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
I think the intelligence is general if it can do any remote job that only requires digital IO. It's general intelligence, not general humanity
77.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
I don't think it's actually true that someone with: 1. A desire to learn calculus 2. A good teacher 3. No mental impairments such as dementia or other major brain drainers could not learn calculus. Most people don't really
78.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
You're comparing the hyper specific evolution of 1 individual (an AI system) to the more general evolution of the entire human species (billions of individuals). It's as if you're forgetting how evolution actually works - na
79.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
What makes you think this is even possible, let alone that you can compete with large and established firms like Jane Street?
80.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
Not sure what the email is - you're missing the user part? AFAIK, emails can't start with @
81.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
cooked too low
82.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
I live in the largest city in the US and saying that the average bread/pastry quality even comes close to Europe is insane. Sure, you can get good bread here. However it's going to cost you 5x what it costs in Europe and it might
83.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
No they don't, lol The garden variety baguettes in Spain that go for 50 cents are superior to $8 "gourmet, artisanal" bread in the US.
84.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
You should but you don't always
85.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
As long as we aren't the #1 most evil company, we're pretty fine
86.
by chipsrafferty 11mo ago
This is true of most products, actually.
87.
by chipsrafferty 1y ago
I mean no disrespect with this, but do you think you write like AI because you talk to LLMs so much, or have you always written in this manner?
88.
by chipsrafferty 1y ago
That sounds pretty fair to me. Having a Meta salary means you can afford to buy food. Having free food on top of a $300,000 income is pretty privileged and complaining about it being taken away even more so.
89.
by chipsrafferty 1y ago
Are you implying that the author of this article doesn't know what they are talking about? Because they basically declared it in the article we just read. Can you point me to where the author of this article gives any proof to the cla
90.
by chipsrafferty 1y ago
To be fair, a lot of people don't have tools.

More ›