chipsa

29 ms·

241.
by chipsa 4y ago
But you can't have as many bits in a UID date as for a generic cookie, and a privacy protecting client could just ignore the ones that don't make sense. Does a 1978 date make sense? Probably not. You could scale this up to the mil
242.
by chipsa 4y ago
They're pointers, just weird ones. The compiler knows it's an array, so it gives the result of the actual amount of space it takes up. If you passed it into a function, and used the sizeof operator in the function, it'd give
243.
by chipsa 4y ago
It's hard to get precise velocity changes with a solid fuel rocket. So must orbital class rockets have a liquid fuel stage at the end. And most rockets don't use oxygen for a propellant, because that's cryogenic, and hard to
244.
by chipsa 4y ago
I'd suspect they'd go up to like 48V. It's the max voltage for USB-PD 3.1, which corresponds with being the effective highest voltage you can have before you're no longer "low voltage". This is also why PoE is
245.
by chipsa 4y ago
The signature is part of the commit hash.
246.
by chipsa 4y ago
Discipline is policy, not protocol.
247.
by chipsa 4y ago
It’s now a regular commercial thing known as vacuum insulated panels. They are of course, expensive, and damage makes them useless.
248.
by chipsa 4y ago
Product differentiation. If you run the head scale server, I’m not certain the funnel service will work. And there’s probably other stuff that is not planned to work with the FOSS coordinator server. And of course, one of the big things is:
249.
Why don’t Windows functions begin with a pointless MOV EDI,EDI on x86-64?(devblogs.microsoft.com)
5 points by chipsa 4y ago|1 comments
250.
by chipsa 4y ago
Look into jetboil campstove/pot. It's got a heat exchanger fin stack on the bottom of the pot to improve boil time.
251.
by chipsa 4y ago
Yeah, I’m pretty sure it’s showing logical pixels, not physical pixels then. Mine as also showing the value you’d get for adjusting based on scaling.
252.
by chipsa 4y ago
That's a crapton of RAM, but are you running on a scaled display? Specifically at 150% scaling?
253.
by chipsa 4y ago
It's side boosters, center booster, and second stage. But the second stage is the same diameter as the boosters, so you can't easily see the difference if you don't know what to look for.
254.
by chipsa 4y ago
Range control uses radars to determine the location and speed of it. Also, pretty sure it's got non-COCOM limited GPS receivers to be able to do the landing, which also would give you velocity.
255.
by chipsa 4y ago
https://designation-systems.net/usmilav/missiles.html Theres’s an entire system for how the designations work.
256.
by chipsa 4y ago
In this specific case, it was because McNamara believed that SAMs were too good for the aircraft to survive, and to keep it from being resurrected, he ordered it destroyed. There was no direct follow on program, just spy satellites.
257.
by chipsa 4y ago
The tooling exists and was carefully packed away. The problem is the stuff that wasn't F-22 specific, and we can't make anymore, because the company that makes them doesn't anymore. Or doesn't even exist.
258.
by chipsa 4y ago
The F-12 cancelation is also why SR-71 producing ended: part of the cancelation order from the SecDef was to destroy the tooling for the YF-12. Which is the same as the tooling for the SR-71. Though: this is actually beside the point becaus
259.
by chipsa 4y ago
It's got a standard substack pop over. You don't have to give it your info.
260.
by chipsa 4y ago
Windows uses 100 nanosecond resolution for NTFS time stamps.
261.
Get notifications for events on your tailnet with webhooks(tailscale.com)
2 points by chipsa 4y ago|0 comments
262.
by chipsa 4y ago
After review, I think you were talking about the Arrow (or Hetz) system? These are meant to defend against ballistic missiles, but not ICBM class (Though, the Arrow 3 appears to be similar in capabilities as the SM-3, which is capable of re
263.
by chipsa 4y ago
Maybe. But my point is that "MAD" isn't a doctrine. It's a game-theoretic idea of the outcome of a nuclear war, and it assumes pre-conditions that aren't necessarily true, especially with regard to our opponents.
264.
by chipsa 4y ago
This would be a space-based weapon.
265.
by chipsa 4y ago
New START has warhead limits, as well as missile limits, and the US has decided it'd rather allocate the warheads to bombers and SLBMs instead of ICBMs. The ICBM force is in a sense, a strategic decoy: they're hardened to make you
266.
by chipsa 4y ago
No. I don't want to bet my life on Putin remaining sane. That's why I support BMD.
267.
by chipsa 4y ago
GBSD is currently programmed to be a single warhead missile [0]. The fire plan for GBI is "shoot-shoot-look-shoot-shoot". There's no requirement for the second "shoot-shoot" to actually occur, and in case of a mass
268.
by chipsa 4y ago
There's no standard for power between trailer and vehicle. You're probably looking at a 400V DC connector, which is going to need to be fairly tough, because you don't want to electrocute someone. You can't just borrow t
269.
by chipsa 4y ago
Hypersonic gliders imply no decoys (can't run decoys in atmosphere at those speeds. If you could, they'd weigh as much as the real thing, so they'd just be the real thing). Arbitrary directions require extra range, which redu
270.
by chipsa 4y ago
True, but the change in US attitudes towards being willing to conduct a first strike, and/or being willing to lose a city to a nuke, won't come quickly or secretly.

More ›