chipsa

34 ms·

391.
by chipsa 5y ago
Only things I trust google to keep up at this point is stuff that makes them lots of money(ads) or that they use massively internally(Gmail)
392.
by chipsa 5y ago
Well, problem number one is that you're trying to do volume of butter instead of weight. All the sticks are by weight, so even though they're marked with tbsp on the side (8), the stick is a quarter lb (4oz). So the notional volum
393.
by chipsa 5y ago
Infantry protects tanks and tanks protect infantry. Tanks provide mobile protected firepower(you need a ATGM to hurt one at range). Tanks can do a number on infantry that doesn't have ATGMs or tanks of their own, and are very effective
394.
by chipsa 5y ago
They log to themselves centrally, and they log to the standard locations on the clients, so you can pull the logs in from there using your standard centralized logging setup. Conflicting address ranges for subnets isn't especially surp
395.
by chipsa 5y ago
You have to worry about attackers modifying the control plane regardless of whether it's under your control or Tailscale's. You do need to collect the logs of how the nodes allowed to connect are changing to your SIEM. Which shoul
396.
by chipsa 5y ago
Tailscale doesn't, but there's another opensource project which does provide control plane: https://github.com/juanfont/headscale . Even with a on-prem control plane, you probably want logging setup to detect
397.
by chipsa 5y ago
I think the point of higher resolution isn't to necessarily hit the sweet spots, but rather to better improve countermeasure rejection.
398.
by chipsa 5y ago
Battleships went out of fashion because the carrier was a better platform for projecting power. Submarines cannot project power, because power requires visibility, while submarines cannot be visible. Carrier are unlikely to go out of fashio
399.
by chipsa 5y ago
To explain more: weight devoted to armoring the bottom is weight that's not devoted to armoring the front, which is much more important for high-intensity combat. And since the bottom has more area than the front, a given weight of arm
400.
by chipsa 5y ago
Anti-missile active defense (Active Protection System) is still in it's infancy, especially with respect to tank based defenses. Many of them only work against direct attack, not top-attack missiles, and it's also common for them
401.
by chipsa 5y ago
https://rules.sonarsource.com/javascript/RSPEC-3358 Maybe, but sonarqube doesn't like it, which means I can't pass the CI pipeline, so...
402.
by chipsa 5y ago
> Conversely, the ink can reappear when temperatures reach below -10°C/14°F. If they accidentally left it in a cold car, the mismarking will come back. Needs to be fairly cold though. Or a freezer.
403.
by chipsa 5y ago
The problem is there are ill-behaved feeds, which need ill-behaved crawlers to work right. I mean, not all of the ill-behavior she mentions is caused by ill-behaved feeds, but that does include scraping individual posts. That's actuall
404.
by chipsa 5y ago
Mu? Not sure how it follows.
405.
by chipsa 5y ago
Infinity is a special type of NaN where the fraction component is all 0.
406.
by chipsa 5y ago
Insufficient. The phone will still contact cell towers in order to maintain communication, because even a phone without a SIM can make a 911 call.
407.
by chipsa 5y ago
Absolutely. I should be able to easily turn off the data on my kid's phone, so they can't just circumvent me blocking the Wifi for them at certain times. Maybe I'm fine with the kid using their phone, but don't want them
408.
by chipsa 5y ago
I think what you're effectively looking at is a rifled (Foster) slug. Turns out the rifling on the slug doesn't do much. The majority of the stabilizing effect on a Foster slug is from the fact that the center of gravity is well a
409.
by chipsa 5y ago
Falcon Heavy was repeatedly delayed, but as you mentioned, Falcon 9 got repeatedly upgraded during that same time. They decided to allocate the resources to 9 instead of Heavy. However, they're not going to be doing that with Starship.
410.
by chipsa 5y ago
Musket balls are actually horribly inaccurate. Whatever spin that gets imparted on it tends to cause it to fly in a direction due to the Magnus Effect. If you don't impart a known amount of spin and direction of spin, the projectile wi
411.
by chipsa 5y ago
You could plausibly run the coils in reverse to pull it back to the beginning, but you'd need to make sure the next round isn't in the way.
412.
by chipsa 5y ago
Might be some zoning restrictions on being able to put residential in. But adding offices is easy, as it's still commercial. Which isn't to say that they couldn't try to get it rezoned, but it's more difficult.
413.
by chipsa 5y ago
RC aircraft jet engines like: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JetCat_P400
414.
by chipsa 5y ago
Rocket deployed parachute. Kinda like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cirrus_Airframe_Parachute_Syst... Speeds up deploy time by making the deploy happen, instead of waiting for gravity/airflow to deploy it.
415.
by chipsa 5y ago
I mean, if it's not Google, what's the alternative?
416.
by chipsa 5y ago
Webauthn if no client cert is presented, then generate one on the server and present to the client to be installed. After that, use the client cert?
417.
by chipsa 5y ago
Google Play has specific restrictions on what it can be bundled with (it can be sideloaded latter without issue right now).
418.
by chipsa 5y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Services_for_UNIX Similar name. And much older. Just imagine there's a '-' after the Windows.
419.
by chipsa 5y ago
"Mutual Assured Destruction" isn't a policy of anyone. It's a game theoretical idea that requires pre-conditions that don't necessarily apply. I mean, you hit on one of them: insane people. Most of the large nuclear
420.
by chipsa 5y ago
Second strike weapon. It is supposed to be able to survive someone else's first strike. First strike weapons can't survive someone else's first strike. It's part of the whole "assured destruction" thing: doesn&

More ›