chermi

13 ms·

241.
by chermi 5mo ago
What is the point of this paper? It bothers me for some reason. Also, they seem completely unaware of physics work on this besides the shit from tegmark. No mention of zecchina or schwab, people actually working on real theories.
242.
by chermi 5mo ago
Look up "mental rehearsals" I think it's called. You do like 2 dry runs in your head. First, you let your mind kind of do what you're already doing, imagine obstacles and challenges along the path to completion. Second,
243.
by chermi 5mo ago
"show me the incentive and I'll tell you the outcome" or however that saying goes
244.
by chermi 5mo ago
Hasnt exactly the opposite proven true? I thought they were actually appreciating in some cases? As token value goes up, old hardware becomes valuable.
245.
by chermi 5mo ago
Was just gonna say the same thing. Just call it a model ffs.
246.
by chermi 6mo ago
Lol cool anecdote. Guess karma for hating on billionaires is more important than saving lives.
247.
by chermi 6mo ago
How is this different than "more" than the sum? Is the argument/claim that we can't figure out stuff via composition? If so, why not?
248.
by chermi 6mo ago
I like the networking perspective, but the ML perspective is such a loose analogy that it's hard to even judge. I mean, we've known forever softening constraints allows you to reach solutions otherwise unreachable, for one? There&
249.
by chermi 6mo ago
"One time". Where have I heard that before?
250.
by chermi 6mo ago
I did undergrad research on amyloid aggregates in 2010, with Alzheimer's as the motivation. I remember papers coming out then making it pretty clear that there was no real mechanistic link between them. It was basically just a symptom.
251.
by chermi 6mo ago
It's really hard to understand. There needs to be really loud batman sign in the sky type signals from some hero third party calling out objective product degradation. Do they use cc internally? If so do they use a different version? T
252.
by chermi 6mo ago
No. There is no one solution. For some things Naproxen simply doesn't work.
253.
by chermi 6mo ago
What about cox-2 like celoxib? Chronic pain for 15 years checking in.
254.
by chermi 6mo ago
Could you share your setup + workflow? How do you get it to not give shit layouts?
255.
by chermi 6mo ago
The raw Q&A is essential. I think Q & Q works so we'll because it reveals how the model is "thinking" about what you're working on, which allows for correction and guidance upfront.
256.
by chermi 6mo ago
My impression is it's more to do with being able to sue for everything under the sun and block things almost indefinitely under different forms of review, usually environmental.
257.
by chermi 6mo ago
Sorry just saw this. The first 50 or so pages are gold, not under a chapter proper. Then most of part IV for non-physicists for exposure to the statistical mechanician's worldview, especially chapters 27-33. I'm not an expert on
258.
by chermi 6mo ago
Lol I largely agree with my beloved dissenters, just not on the same magnitude. I understand complete specs are impossible and equivalent to source code via declaration. My disagreement is with this particular part: "t's more like
259.
by chermi 6mo ago
This just sounds like incomplete specs to me. And poor testing.
260.
by chermi 6mo ago
There's a lot of work, good and some really bad, about fisher information and physics. vijay balasubramanian and Jim Sethna may interest you, though sethna is more condensed matter. And of course amari.
261.
by chermi 6mo ago
I recommend every where I get a chance : mackay's book. https://www.inference.org.uk/mackay/itila/book.html
262.
by chermi 6mo ago
"Nats of difference" carries a lot of the load there. It's not incorrect, but I don't see how it's a superior explanation to op?
263.
by chermi 6mo ago
It's been both normalized and suppressed. I'm old enough to remember not being to able to point out SF crime problems without being called a fascist. It's denial, it's perverse. Noah smith claims that our(USA) "sol
264.
by chermi 6mo ago
If you want to hear from the man himself, see link below. It was a fairly soft interview. I listened mainly because it was Noah and wasn't expecting him to be so pro-surveillance. So, even though I don't agree with them, it might
265.
by chermi 6mo ago
You basically have to be involved if you're meta. Even if there's only 5% chance this AI stuff is as disruptive as the labs claim it is, you can't afford to miss out. Even if you're lagging frontier, you must develop th
266.
by chermi 6mo ago
Wtf. Was this just scrubbed/pushed down from frontpage?
267.
by chermi 6mo ago
This has consistently pissed me off. It seems like we all just accepted that whatever they define as "functioning"/"OK" is suitable. I see the status now shows, but there should be a very loud third party ruthlessl
268.
by chermi 6mo ago
Yup displays as an "auth" issue to me. Just a nice reminder that my original plan was to be provider agnostic but everything was working so well with cc I lost sight lol.
269.
by chermi 6mo ago
I didn't say it wasn't socialism. I said it wasn't a counterexample. As for whether you still think it's worth taking Marx seriously as an economist, I'm guessing you'd laugh at someone citing Smith. Yet one ha
270.
by chermi 6mo ago
Well you're criticizing shitty thinkers rightfully w.r.t to co-ops; they're great, they aren't top-down. But you're committing the same error. Co-ops are completely compatible with capitalism so holding them up as co

More ›