Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cheevly
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
91.
▲
by
cheevly
10mo ago
Asset generation is hard.
92.
▲
by
cheevly
10mo ago
Yes they could, it's called Claude Code.
93.
▲
by
cheevly
11mo ago
This is a pre-GPT3 HN post.
94.
▲
by
cheevly
11mo ago
Yeah for the past 2 years now I exclusively listen to AI music.
95.
▲
by
cheevly
11mo ago
Cages. Evil. Literally. Extremism. Greedy. Exploited. Healthy. Offensive.
96.
▲
by
cheevly
11mo ago
Or I was just complimenting LLM progress in a snarky way?
97.
▲
by
cheevly
11mo ago
Reading HN comments just makes me realize how vastly LLMs exceed human intelligence.
98.
▲
by
cheevly
11mo ago
These are not the same.
99.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
Developers aren't the target audience for ChatGPT. Why aren't you using their API? It's trivial to generate the type of experience you're looking for. If you're a developer...then develop!
100.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
95% of HN comments nowadays amount to: "I have no idea how to wield AI, but I'm going to talk authoritatively on the subject and use fallacies to downplay the claims of others."
101.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
Yes, but at profoundly larger scale, outside of ChatGPT in my own agentic architecture.
102.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
You have it so backwards. The complexity of those places is exactly why AI will replace it.
103.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
Well-said and spot on.
104.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
You hate AI and want to go outside and stare at a tree? How are posts like this on HACKERnews? What is the point of all these types of posts on a site that is literally about hacking technology?
105.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
Unless you have automated fine-tuning pipelines that self-optimize optimize models for your tasks and domains, you are not even close to utilizing LLMs to their potential. But stating that you don’t need extensive, specialized skills is eno
106.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
And the irony is that those of us using AI to amplify our output to produce at exponential speeds feel like your comments are gaslighting us instead! Ive never seen such an outright divide in practitioners of a technology in terms of perc
107.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
Very cool! My retired AI agent transformed live webpage content, here's an old video clip of transforming HN to My Little Pony (with some annoying sounds): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_j6cYeByOU . Skip to ~37 secon
108.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
Do you realize how much health-related research Zuckerburg’s foundation does? There was literally a post on here last week about it, geez.
109.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
Many of us have solved this with internal tooling that has not yet been shared or released to the public.
110.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
Quality cringe
111.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
LLMs have literally won Pokemon. Im pretty sure that using an app is 10x simpler.
112.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
I know someone that generated unit tests successfully.
113.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
Down with data-driven decisions and probabilistic computing!!
114.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
You’ve scored one facepalm. Congratulations.
115.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
I'm curious what walls you've hit? I literally can't find the boundaries of what is possible to achieve.
116.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
I’ve also gone down this rabbit hole of thinking. Here is the main roadblock I encounter when imagining it in practice: It might prevent users from having a common ‘language’ for describing their interactions with the product. If everyone p
117.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
If ‘quality software’ is difficult to monetize, then it means the users do not agree with your definition of ‘quality’.
118.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
No you
119.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
Within the next few years, you will be using AI knowingly and constantly if you use modern computers or the internet.
120.
▲
by
cheevly
1y ago
If you are involved in knowledge work, please pay me to automate your job with LLMs for you. I’m able to take on any breadth of work thrown my way, so looking forward to your outreach.
More ›