checkyoursudo

89 ms·

901.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
I would be super surprised if young muslims were any different than young christians and young-everything-elses in this regard. The increase in islam in europe is primarily from an influx of muslim immigrants. On the generational time scale
902.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
I would also generally agree with this. I had a client once who worked for a company for a few years, then did not for a few years, and then did again for three decades. The company terminated this person. The company found out this person
903.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
(IAAL) Just for clarity's sake: Some kinds of contracts definitely do require signatures to be executed and others don't. If it's important to you, then make sure you know which kind of execution yours requires. I have read c
904.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
Any examples? I have blocked Facebook for many years, and I can't think of a single time where it has mattered. I run without JavaScript by default, so maybe I just don't notice those kinds of things after years of conditioning.
905.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
I guess then I'm confused about the narrative of the story so far. Did Facebook have control over its (my? your?) data at Cambridge Analytica or not? I thought the extra 50 to 250 million profiles scraped were unauthorized access? I co
906.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
If you are more paranoid of intra-browser security risks than inter-browser risks?
907.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
The controls are agreements that make getting caught doing the unauthorized act painful enough that it might be enough to deter the act in the first place. If the price is high enough, bad actors will be willing to breach NDAs/CDAs&#x2
908.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
Well, NDAs/CDAs/licensing agreements/etc can make disclosure to non-authorized 3rd parties very painful for your customers/partners/etc to contravene your requirements for what they do with data, intellectual proper
909.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
"Words still mean things" is not an argument. This can be a 'breach' by many of these definitions.[0][1][2] You're basically saying, "Words only mean the things that I want them to mean, and if you try to use t
910.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
I'm not the original poster, but maybe they just mean that as it stands right now, artificial intelligence refers to nothing that is actually intelligent in a way that an average person probably thinks about intelligence, and it's
911.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
Maybe deaths per speed per time (or distance, since speed over time is the same as distance at speed). More deaths at higher speeds and fewer at lower would seem more likely. Purely using time or distance may skew the interpretation, if the
912.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
Sure. If they keep working for winning candidates in the future, then maybe I'll be convinced that they aren't just BS? If they even exist in the future, I guess...
913.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
So they're 50-50? How do I know they weren't the reason Cruz lost? How do I know that they didn't lose the popular vote for Trump? Take their word for it? No thanks.
914.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
What's incorrect? Having knowledge of an actual crime can make you an accomplice. I said generally. You said generally. I made edits before you quoted that to clarify that knowledge alone isn't likely going to make you a target of
915.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
Wait. The very same Ted Cruz who is now president of the United States of America? Impressive.
916.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
I don't know specifically in Manning's case, but yes, in general in the US, knowledge that a crime is about to be, is being, or has been committed can make you an accomplice and expose you to criminal liability. In not all cases w
917.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
Neat ideas. What happens when my wife has the car with the big battery at work while I'm at home on a cloudy day?
918.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
I don't know if you have a specific reason for using Chrome, but on my linux desktop, I use Chromium for Amazon (and the few websites that just don't work right with my firefox+privacy/security setup), and with Widevine I can
919.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
This. Being a republic does not preclude also being a representative democracy (or even a direct democracy at some level for that matter).
920.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
I would live in that (Ikea?) house in a heartbeat, though not your white-featureless-cube dystopian horror outside. My ideal house has almost nothing in it. For some, aesthetic is certainly greeblies[0], but I think minimalism is widely acc
921.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
No, not fiduciary duty. One theoretical approach to corporate governance/management, but it's not a legal duty. A competing theory is guaranteeing the long-term health of the company instead of short-term profits (current sharehol
922.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
On my laptop, I block all images by default, while I don't on my desktop (like you, I load CSS and images there). I find myself more and more liking to use my laptop for browsing, which makes me think I could block images by default on
923.
by checkyoursudo 9y ago
On my Linux desktop, I run firefox with uMatrix and if a page isn't readable without javascript then I don't bother, except a very few handful of sites that are whitelisted. If it's content that I really feel like I need to s
924.
Ask HN: How to transform from US lawyer to Euro programmer or data scientist?
2 points by checkyoursudo 9y ago|0 comments