cheatsheet

9 ms·

61.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
Computer security has more subfields than cryptography. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_flow_%28informati...
62.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
Yours is mathematically nonsensical. You either have discrete containers that denote privacy relations between information and parties or you do not have it at all. Privacy does not exist on a gradient on a computer. You can not calculate t
63.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
That would be fine, if the 'people who perceive' would realize perception is much more variant and undecidable than 'people who perceive' acknowledge.
64.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
Definitions of words matter when people skim text as to determine how they communicate their opinions, form their opinions, and take action, including writing legislation. If I was actually typing out the opinions of my spouse word for wor
65.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
> That's fine, but your reason seems suspicious. I prefer to avoid living my life in a fishbowl. > provably private This does not have a mathematics definition. Private means not accessible to anyone aside from the owner. That is
66.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
I am not particularly looking for a debate today; but this seems to be a disagreement of terms when using the word "provable". Just because a polynomial time algorithm can not be constructed to distinguish a single record does not
67.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
> provably private citation?
68.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
I just sort of abstract over the specifics of the implementation of arrows and assume there is an arrow that denotes the 'kind' of arrow. Does it express a monotonic function (order preserving), does it express a non monotonic fu
69.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
I scanned through the first 50 slides or so. I've read and drawn out the first few chapters to myself of "Categories for the Working Mathematician", so for me - this was a very nice presentation that graphically illustrated t
70.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
I think a wise person would hesitate at judging a task hard or easy.
71.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
Sure, but there will still be bugs. We might have to figure out what a bug is semantically on the next layer of abstraction as we are developing it (and have the capacity to formally describe it), but there will be opinions, and thus there
72.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
It is a long tail distribution and it happens because of different computational complexity classes. I don't really know if there is anything to be done about it. I'll give you a high grumpy old forum five though.
73.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
> This is why most algorithmic art is so uninteresting. It falls on one side or the other of the randomness/repetition valley, without hitting that sweet spot that the best human creativity finds. > That's not even thinking
74.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
There's little point to understanding it unless it affects you. Most people think things don't affect them, and sometimes it can seem like just thinking about it can make it affect you when it didn't affect you before. Even I
75.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
Nevermind, I'd like to delete the previous comment I wrote, but you helped me be a bit more mindful of appreciating the experience while I am experiencing it.
76.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
I started using Photoshop when I was maybe 12 years old. I learned to be skeptical of every image, every advertisement, and there is so much more psychology, philosophy and art theory I could go into. I am 'female' and I grew up t
77.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
I can love both family, friends, coworkers, and research. It's a slow process of the accumulation of a lifestyle. It doesn't happen over night, and I can't force it. That's the biggest thing I've learned since leavi
78.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
> communication is knowledge creation, even if it simply conveys an idea from one brain to another, because there's no direct transfer mechanism the receiver of the idea must create it based on observations of the words of the give
79.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
Yes, but that essentially is saying the same thing as "people's assumptions can differ". This can be an assumption about the meaning of a word or subtleties in the collection of concepts that connect to that word (as often se
80.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
> (or worse, walking away with different ideas about what what decided) Eh, this can also denote synergistic group think or collective creativity. Expect the unexpected, but within a clearly defined range of variability. I'm not tal
81.
by cheatsheet 12y ago
Maybe it's accepted over time, or maybe it isn't. Maybe a lot of time makes it easier to deal with losing literally a chunk of yourself. But I don't think it does. "It's that if you want to make a human being into a