Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
chaps
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
29 ms
·
631.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
What? Custom game modes is ABSOLUTELY on their radar. Less so than the main game for sure, but to say ZK doesn't support custom game modes is flat out wrong.
632.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
Because ZK doesn't have an exponential economy, each unit is important, even the cheap ones. There's also metal reclaim in battles, which tends to be about half of your econ. So fights become terf wars to make sure the enemy doesn
633.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
That is usually referred to as "pseudonymization" For your world, maybe. For most things with a public face, "anonymization" is what's used, not "pseudonymization". So yes, this article is referrin
634.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
A lot of it exists to sell your lat/lng and trip information to organizations like Wejo, who then goes on to sell it to gov organizations.
635.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
Aw, I thought this was related to, "A cat explains DNS". https://youtu.be/4ZtFk2dtqv0
636.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
Used to use a co-working space for my own stuff. Mostly to get out of the house. In the two years I was there, in the same building, the co-working company changed three times. Mostly the same layout and all that, but everything/one el
637.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
You're attributing way more malice than I think is warranted. Take a breath, friend. I've been largely calm and collected in this conversation, but you've (ironically) raised this to a higher adversarial point. I have no ill
638.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
Not political messages, but the first time I used the start menu in windows 10 after years away... They showed an MSN article for Kim Kardashian. Within seconds it completely validated my dislike of windows.
639.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
Erm? Preaching to the choir there. The Linux VM was only used because I wasn't allowed to wipe Windows from my work machine. It was the best alternative for the situation.
640.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
/proc is amazing once you get the hang of it and get a good understanding of what's all in there. Especially if you're doing low level performance tuning. It's particularly helpful in larger infrastructures where tool v
641.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
When an old employer required us to use windows, I just built a Linux VM that was always set to fullsceen. Surprisingly they were okay with it, so maybe you'll have the same luck?
642.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
"slightest bit of irritation or frustration in response." I'll admit I could have been kinder, but I'm not sure I'd call their irritation "slight". You're really downplaying the (clearly intentional)
643.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
Muckrock.com is a wonderful source of information as a starting point. It has many, many, many requests publicly online. They also run documentcloud.org, which has many millions of documents received through FOIA. There are definitely group
644.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
Thank you! I genuinely appreciate the kind words. I'm hopeful I'll have the next one out by the end of the year. A less successful story, but it's a good'n.
645.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
Friend, I don't know how to say this politely, but I'll try my best: you're really missing something fundamental here and I'm not sure what it is or why you're so persistent on thinking it's okay to allow a gov
646.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
For mail with someone else's name on it, sure. But in this case, the "mail" had my name on the front, back and side... plus a username and password that only I know. So yeah, not sure that really applies here.
647.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
Easy. If I receive an email from them that contains an outlook 365 email header, then they use Outlook 365. So then just send them the command that works with outlook 365. It's literally that simple. I have a good idea of what the amou
648.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
Maybe. But again, please try to view it as an expression of years and years of frustration. The stakes are high with this shit. When we are denied access to records, the implications are often as serious as literal deaths, sexual violence,
649.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
I've spoken to many people inside government who work on the open data side. To be blunt: the signal to noise ratio isn't very good in terms of whether someone actually knows what they're talking about. So please consider my
650.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
None of this is open data. Open data is data that's released on a discretionary basis; often times a FOIA request for the same data found within open data has a legal requirement for redaction. We see this happen all the time. What
651.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
Which is? :)
652.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
Heh, the city called me a good samaritan for acting in good faith, plus completely redid their entire process afterwards, including escalation paths to make this sort of thing less aggressive and conflict oriented in the future. So, uh, I&#
653.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
This was definitely not my first rodeo and I like to think I've done a good job in acting in good faith in future similar instances [1] for example. Every time I've reported something, the other side acts differently every single
654.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
<3
655.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
Very much so! Since writing, I've since gone into freelance investigative journalism and nonprofit work focusing on gov transparency. A lot of what I learned has fortunately been applicable to a lot of investigative work. I need to wri
656.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
Yes, I did indeed sign an affidavit.
657.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
Yep, someone in a separate thread was curious about similar work so I figured I'd post it again. Edited the title to make it clear it's from 2018.
658.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
Weird! Not somewhere where I can give it more juice, but in the meantime try this: https://web.archive.org/web/20230129193630/https://mchap.io/...
659.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
Thanks for the laugh :)
660.
▲
by
chaps
3y ago
Hah, that's a much simpler title. :)
More ›