Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
chaosbolt
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
20 ms
·
61.
▲
by
chaosbolt
3y ago
Because mods there get paid by external actors to promote X content and delete Y. It's been known for ever, do prople think these guys just shit money? And the "sensitive" content deletes itself?
62.
▲
by
chaosbolt
3y ago
It's because of people like you we have 0 privacy today, "oh the government is gathering our data? well nothing to hide and they use it to fight terrorism", "oh assange is arrested? well he had it coming", "oh
63.
▲
by
chaosbolt
3y ago
GPT is censored in lots of subjects, the ones choosing these subjects are OpenAI/Microsoft, the government is supposedly chosen by the people...
64.
▲
by
chaosbolt
3y ago
I use windows 10 ltsc on one of my personal laptops, and yesterday I had to use ms teams... you actually have to try hard to make software that bad, it's on the level of itunes on windows, and itunes isn't like that because of inc
65.
▲
by
chaosbolt
3y ago
"How do we know that..." "...is there a Snopes fact checked source?..." I'm honestly finding it more and more difficult to believe there are actual biological people who think and talk this way...
66.
▲
by
chaosbolt
3y ago
Binance has not only been more honest than FTX but also more honest than Coinbase. But this is HN and the people here are smart but lack the intellectual courage and honesty to challenge their beliefs, so they'll believe in things like
67.
▲
by
chaosbolt
3y ago
Yes Russia did invade Ukraine, but wouldn't the US invade Canada if Russia had organized a coup there to get rid of Trudeau then put a Russian puppet there? Of course the US would... Or would you argue that the 2014 Ukrainian coup wasn
68.
▲
by
chaosbolt
3y ago
What am I missing here? I thought both Microsoft and Activision were American companies, why would the UK even have a say in this? Is it a "if you buy it you can't operate here" kind of statement?
69.
▲
by
chaosbolt
3y ago
Oh you're right. TIL. I just assumed because it's used a lot in Chinese phones.
70.
▲
by
chaosbolt
3y ago
Contrary to mediatek chips who openly send it to China or apple chips who also openly send it to Apple, and of course let's not forget the intel management engine ;)
71.
▲
by
chaosbolt
3y ago
It's funny how you can tell who spends time on reddit by when they say you said something you didn't say to burn you at the stake.
72.
▲
by
chaosbolt
3y ago
>anti-4chan They've been calling everyone outside their site an NPC for years, looks like they were right.
73.
▲
by
chaosbolt
4y ago
12 days with no food? Like just water and electrolytes etc.? This is some spartan discipline.
74.
▲
by
chaosbolt
4y ago
This implies the internet isn't glitchy, spammy, scammy and AI powered today. Who do you think wrote the news for the last 10 years? Because either journalists only need a pen to get a job and all have the same opinion or that garbage
75.
▲
by
chaosbolt
4y ago
The internet has always been a too good to be true kind of thing, a black swan of human history where the lords and kings and priests didn't control every aspect of the slave's life, it took them 2 to 3 decades but eventually the
76.
▲
by
chaosbolt
4y ago
Exactly and I doubt QE will work now, there is a reason pyramid schemes don't go up forever
77.
▲
by
chaosbolt
4y ago
>agreement There is no agreement in my opinion and there never is on QE, but what choice does any government have between "1 Trillion loss that can trigger more loss and potentially cause a revolution, a famine, a war, etc..."
78.
▲
by
chaosbolt
4y ago
1T$ will never explode and drag it down, it's "QE saved by the state" kind of money, so if UBS is overleveraged, it makes sense to buy Credit Suisse, this way if it all goes to shit they'll blame it on CS and if it doesn
79.
▲
by
chaosbolt
4y ago
Exactly, plus all 3 comments assumed I talked about my input into the computer, while I talked about how much info I can take into my brain from the computer being already too fast, who cares if it takes me 2 seconds to write a sentence I t
80.
▲
by
chaosbolt
4y ago
Yeah imagine the anticompetitive laws in marketing and the free will questions we'll ask then? Something like Burger king suing mcdonalds for showing you a bicmac and releasing dopamine x1000 times not because it's weird (-er than
81.
▲
by
chaosbolt
4y ago
The way I use the mouse and keyboard makes this already too fast and I find myself in need to slow down how fast I take information in anyway. What makes you think people can handle it being 4 times faster? The bottleneck will eventually be
82.
▲
by
chaosbolt
4y ago
Using an expensive AI model to run a textual version of a game made for a portable console that came out 2 decades ago is some dystopian shit.
83.
▲
by
chaosbolt
4y ago
AI pics used to look like things you'd see in a dream. Hands are not different, in fact one of the best ways to find if you're dreaming or not is to try and count your fingers, in a dream your hand would look exactly like a hand g
84.
▲
by
chaosbolt
4y ago
>No losses associated with the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank will be borne by the taxpayer. Mmmmm, so did the money fall down from the sky?
85.
▲
by
chaosbolt
4y ago
>according to the survey Privacy is like money, it's something everyone wants, the keywords is wants, if you ask people in a survey they'll say they want their privacy, if you wait until they're tired and mindlessly scroll
86.
▲
The Gervais Principle – Read by “Artificial Jeremy Irons”
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
chaosbolt
4y ago
|
1 comments
87.
▲
by
chaosbolt
4y ago
So most of you are familiar with the Gervais Principle ebook (originally in the form of blog posts) by Venkatesh Rao, since I see it posted at least once a quarter here for the past decade. I used Elevenlabs and a sample of Jeremy Irons to
88.
▲
by
chaosbolt
4y ago
HN is something else though, you post anything criticizing Google or Apple in the past year and the first answer is always some weird mental gymnastics trying to tell you how the decision is for the good of the consumer instead of driven by
89.
▲
by
chaosbolt
4y ago
Yeah it's great as an assistant to a critical thinking human, people who are criticizing it are either doing it for clickbait aka money or expected it go think for them. Like it showed me how to split an audio file into parts with ffmp
90.
▲
by
chaosbolt
4y ago
Exactly, people need religion, so they will stick to the first thing that comes up, ritualize it then prosecute you in its name. This is why I laugh when I read that like 50% of people in X country are atheists, are you kidding me? My guess
More ›