chadgpt3

11 ms·

361.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
"Move fast and break things" applies even more in business than in software. If you get the revenue and don't suffer a legal penalty, you win. I've worked at companies that didn't outright fake their certifications
362.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
I have good news for you: everything is legal if you don't get caught.
363.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
It doesn't matter if they personally could do it. As long as they have the ability to contract someone who can do it to do it.
364.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
If they're closing they have nothing to lose by putting the source code up on the internet and saying sue us if you want. It's continuing businesses who are scared of liability.
365.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
Is it the government's job to enforce people's teeth? I presume you also observed something worse than that but chose not to write about it?
366.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
What if they were legal but hard to get? Say, we stop/arresting for possession or use in private, stop giving dealers and producers harsh sentences, but still give them moderate to weak sentences, stop proactively searching for dealers
367.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
It's simply about segregation. If you have one device that is kept secure and another that is not, use the secure device for banking. Can be two phones, two PCs, or a phone and a PC.
368.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
If attestation didn't exist, media companies wouldn't require it.
369.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
Would there be any point where a horrible person and 150k of his supporters marching would become a crime?
370.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
Notice how you've lumped in "support of terrorist groups" (i.e. holding placards) with raping people's daughters?
371.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
A loud minority can look like a majority. (I'm not sure if there's a way to solve this)
372.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
He means the tracking potential is the same. Is the Oyster card anonymous?
373.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
It's not for the benefit of the security company though. In fact they get zero benefit from it. It's for the benefit of the users of the software which makes the calculus more complicated.
374.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
This comment should not be greyed out. I feel that we all forget this far too much. You've exaggerated it somewhat. There is no right to demand someone does something for free, and we have gotten dependent on people doing things for fr
375.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
Why?
376.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
Why don't you? It costs around $20 per year . Every serious computer nerd should have one, and a web server with at least a basic homepage.
377.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
Distinguish between trespassing-style "you can go there but there might be consequences" and prison-style "you are physically unable to go there" Currently it's trespassing-style. If you modify your Google client, G
378.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
How do you accidentally hallucinate just one citation? If the bread is moldy in one spot, throw out the whole loaf, because the same invisible process that produced the mold spot is taking place throughout the loaf.
379.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
arXiv is gatekeeping science by only accepting fact-based papers instead of fairytales.
380.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
Plausible deniability on banning the person from all science forever. Are all venues like this, however?
381.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
I don't believe submitting AI slop is against the guidelines.
382.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
Ooh, that's a great idea. I'm writing that down in my lost of ways to enshittify a company for money in case I ever end up in charge of a company that can be enshittified for money.
383.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
If you have a large PR with multiple nontrivial commits I think you should merge it so the intermediate states are the same ones that were originally tested. Otherwise you could break bisects, among other issues.
384.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
We have central planners in the US. For instance Jeffrey Bezos, Sam Altman, Elon Musk. They compete with each other for planning power, but they compete by making the best plans for themselves, not for society.
385.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
This is correct.
386.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
Some of these companies derive their revenue in a way similar to taxes, as you're forced to pay them for services. I don't see why it matters whether it's technically defined as a tax or not, if you still have to pay. Think o
387.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
Note that propagandizing managers was a rational choice by AI companies to increase the revenue of AI companies.
388.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
You don't get paid 20% more for achieving 20% more achievement, that's for sure.
389.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
It's embarrassing for Hacker News that people here are commenting to support attestation systems that prevent you from owning the device you bought.
390.
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
The way it'll happen is that the party in power is trying to ram it through and the opposition is firmly against it, and then the parties switch, and the party in power is trying to ram it through and the opposition is firmly against i

More ›