ch4s3

22 ms·

451.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
Yeah, its a really beautiful site.
452.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
> The authors pointed out “there are significant drawbacks in the existing human literature” including “lack of longitudinal studies, methodological heterogeneity, selection of tissue type, and the influence of developmental stage and tr
453.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
I think many American movements tend to take on an everything bagel quality and it becomes too unclear what the actual demands are and what any politician could do to achieve the goal.
454.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
Did you read it though ? The article is about negative polarization spirals. You keep missing that entirely.
455.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
Again you didn’t read the article. Read it or fuck off and stop arguing about the headline.
456.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
No I’m the Chabad case JFK’s bullshit nonprofit had been filtering and making phone calls in Yiddish to convince mothers not to vaccinate their children. However the community was receptive to arguments about the benefits after an outbreak.
457.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
> Then you haven’t looked. There are endless examples of qualified people explaining the actual risks and benefits of vaccines in clear and honest terms. Yes there's plenty of that in some places, like tiktok or the NYT. I mean that
458.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
I'm saying both that it is correct and the other poster should read it or move on.
459.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
> See, deplatforming works! Again that's not what the article here that you didn't read is talking about. The article is about negative polarization and preference falsification.
460.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
It doesn't seem like its working very well for them, and if anything polarize people further as the article suggests.
461.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
Anti-vaxers were removed from every platform for more than 2 years during the pandemic, and that didn't work. I rarely see anyone actually going into a public forum to try to clearly communicate the evidence for vaccine safety in clear
462.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
So you still didn't read the article and you're changing the subject to cover for the fact that you made up that the article defends bircherism. Nice attempt at a deflection, but you're still reacting to something you didn&#x
463.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
They literally aren't defending Bircherism ,they say that it would have been more productive to argue against them in public to discredit their ideas rather than letting them fester off in some dark corner. They're talking about h
464.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
Did you read the article or are you responding to the headline?
465.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
> This article is predicated on an unfounded counterfactual. I think it's just evaluating the claim that removing these people from a public platform removes their ideas from popular discourse, which obviously didn't work. The
466.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
California is very arid, when water evaporates it rains out over the ocean or farther north. The upper mid-west is very wet and the evaporated water will come back down over the Great Lakes watershed which is enormous. > This is actually
467.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
No, like armor and rifle optics.
468.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
Sorry, I think I’m failing to read carefully today!
469.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
The evaporation in the great lakes region will just end up as rain near the lakes.
470.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
what the fuck are you talking about, these facilities process the water and return it to the source.
471.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
Yeah seriously. If you're going to fight. "tooth and nail" against a data center, maybe reevaluate and direct your energy towards some productive like better tax laws, more energy generation, and so on.
472.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
> Money is a resource. Someone has to deal with the utility rate hikes that tend to follow large new consumers It seems like new power generation should be a trivial concern, the upper Midwest is incredibly windy. The block to adding new
473.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
> Probably best to just let it stay an industrial wasteland shithole rather than put datacenters there. That seems to be the attitude unfortunately.
474.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
> No they do not. The flow there is already balanced, and lake levels are lower than usual. You aren't going to meaningfully drain the lakes to cool chip fabs when the vast majority of that water will simply go back into the lake ei
475.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
How does the data center "eat resources"? Discharged water will stay in the watershed and it rains back down on you. As long as they aren't drawing directly out of the aquifer without putting it back then its fine. How do the
476.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
> The water in the great lakes is controlled by an international compact that prevents water from being diverted from the Great Lakes to other watersheds. Who said anything about diverting it? Pump cold water out, store hot water until i
477.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
> imagine what DARPA and the like have been doing for the past 20 years. People always say this, but anyone I know who's ever worked in one of these companies that contracts for the DoD or DARPA always complains about how behind the
478.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
There are in the US, those places just have more hostile legislatures and regulatory regimes that make construction impossible. See the debacle around the Foxconn Wisconsin project which happened under a very industry friendly governor. The
479.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
It's interesting how simple this looks, off the shelf parts, and 3D printed components. I'm almost surprised this doesn't already exist after looking at it.
480.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
It isn't an appeal to emotion. Jimmy Lai stood up for free speech in Hong Kong, factually and it paying with his life. I'm simply pointing out that you have probably never seen real courage or conviction in your life and aren&#x27

More ›