cfcef

10 ms·

91.
by cfcef 11y ago
I am not sure if you are being sarcastic, but double-edged razors are similar in time and effort to cartridge razors. Straight edges are, however, substantially more demanding in not cutting yourself and in maintenance. (I switched from car
92.
by cfcef 11y ago
> rather the service is about the delivery and cost mechanism, not the actual product received. Presumably they are purchasing the razor blades from Dorco and importing them. http://www.uspto.gov/patents-maintaining-paten
93.
by cfcef 11y ago
> Could just be a way to let it die without loss of face. An odd way to save face: promoting it to a listed company whose financials they are going to have to regularly provide information on? This makes it higher profile and provides mo
94.
by cfcef 11y ago
I have not. It sounds interesting but raw and unsuitable for end-users. I hope the quality improves and they can get it packaged up in a way that existing document scanners can plug into easily.
95.
by cfcef 11y ago
I hope not. Tesseract delivers bad results on high quality scans, far below the same OCR quality achieved by services like Google Books. What the OCR market needs is someone who will bring that level of OCR quality - or better - to the mass
96.
by cfcef 11y ago
My point there was that besides being a true shuffle, 'shuf' also has an algorithmic advantage when you only need a few lines (similar to how lookup has an advantage when you only need a few).
97.
by cfcef 11y ago
Have you confused this with TAME? This won't be looking at mortality.
98.
by cfcef 11y ago
In the same vein of 'improvements over things everyone assumes you have to do with the more famous tool', we could say grep '^string' : look :: sort -R : shuf
99.
by cfcef 11y ago
> As such, it seems reasonable to suggest that satoshi wanted that (gmx) email to be hacked since it had such a weak password. Wasn't that because the GMX password reset functionality was so shitty that it could be easily guessed,
100.
by cfcef 11y ago
If "Managing an Experimental Household: the Dees of Mortlake and the Practice of Natural Philosophy" sounded interesting to you too, you don't need JSTOR access: http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/ic