Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cf498
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
91.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
A raspberry is quite an overkill for an environmental sensor. You could achieve the same with an Cortex M4 (minus the microphone).
92.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Because of the US free speech laws. The US is the location where the rest of the world usually hosts there problematic content. It is, or was, also rampant with non nude child pornography sites. While illegal in most of Europe (and other co
93.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
There was a dutch documentary about kekistan, where they interviewed one of the creators. If i remember correctly it was giving a rather nice insight into the phenomena. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97FGbbTzJZ4 (subtitl
94.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Thanks for the insight
95.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Are there actually businesses who just use the normal windows updater? (Ignoring smaller businesses without IT departments for a second). I assumed the forced patching at boot/reboot was a consumer version thing? A unforeseen update fr
96.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Theft is the wrong word, you are looking at copyright infringement. Not a moral judgment but simply the wrong term. There are no additional costs created at the producers site. The bars are having private licenses instead of those for publi
97.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
It doesnt have to be botnets. Proxylists are enough to enable that attack for almost anyone. Pornsites have had that problem for decades and their solution was captchas, which led to OCR on the attacker site which resulted in stuff like rec
98.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
>The world of 1984 does indeed seem unsustainable because everything seems to be based on negative emotions, and there are no(?) examples in history of such a system surviving for a significant time. Unfortunately we are working on more
99.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
I am hard pressed to see Athens from a few thousand years ago as a real case study, its simply to far out of our frame of reference. Switzerland in more recent history is a rather ugly counterexample to your theory. They had a referendum on
100.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Because its relative. You cant get car traffic as safe as airplanes. Its not reasonable to hold Boeing to the same standards as automotive traffic. Automotive traffic is simply far more dangerous then flying. You also wouldnt be ok with peo
101.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
If you have companies who are to big to fail they behave that way. We just had that with banks and the financial crisis. Leaving such institutions as is is incredibly dangerous and incentives risky and reckless behavior at the cost of socie
102.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Its not as clear cut as you describe it, especially with the age limit. There are quite a few terminal kids who suffer unbearably and have for large parts of their lifes. Its not an easy topic, but the Netherlands as well as Belgium have in
103.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Why would you assume a high grade of efficiency, let alone perfection?
104.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
>is said to never even have been a zero day, i.e. before it was publicly released, Microsoft was forewarned and released a patch. Which is nonsense. It was an exploit that was actively used for at least 5 years before Microsoft was infor
105.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
I dont think that is the case, but it might be a regional or cultural difference.
106.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Its not just about accidentally crossing the line but the possibility of bad intentions. Especially if there is a difference in power. University has the same problem. Never be alone in a room with a female student you have to grade is real
107.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
>That also means Huawei will only be able to push security updates for Android once they’re made available in AOSP, assuming the company uses its own update system. It’s not clear yet how this will affect the full range of Android integr
108.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
And not having your seatbelt on puts you in a better situation if your car is sinking in a lake. Doenst mean you shouldnt wear a seatbelt. Talking to the police is gambling with your life. You might get lucky you might not.
109.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
The "Lies" group giving out Qurans got banned a few years ago and groups on the left are still regularly hit with §129 trials and cant be employed in the public sector. The AFD is far from being silenced or even prosecuted. They a
110.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
The police in Germany already proposed to ban Tor as its "really not needed in western democracies".
111.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
It is organized censorship across a large part of media people use to communicate today. As a cooperation between governments and those companies. It really doesnt need more then OPs comment, this is abhorrent. Its quite a big step towards
112.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Dont be mad, the military is paying quite a bit for advertisement.
113.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
I expect a company to continue a service for the foreseeable future (lets say the normal duration of the warranty on the product) if it is necessary to use a product i just bought. Otherwise I expect a refund or it feels very much like frau
114.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
yes https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-...
115.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Which would be quite expensive
116.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
They most of the time dont actually sell those mugs, the 6€ are a deposit.
117.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Sounds like a functionality to me edit: sounded a bit impolite. I was trying to point out, that just covering all needed functionalities doesnt mean anyone will use your product. Frivolous eye candy, ie the appearance is a key aspect for qu
118.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
To be fair, it is "frivolous eye-candy”. But that doesnt change the fact that you are not going to reach the people which rank eye candy higher then functionality.
119.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
Its not just police being able to force to unlock your device. The idea of possession alone for security authentication is generally very problematic. Its only introduced out of convenience, which is generally not a good sign when it comes
120.
▲
by
cf498
7y ago
The NYT shouldnt need to be involved in the discussion, they are simply making the free speech of an author available to more people. A bit more complicated megaphone. Someone working for a super PAC how ever isnt spending his own money.
More ›