cess11

30 ms·

511.
by cess11 11mo ago
Yes, it is. States have a clear obligation to stop the genocide in Palestine. Only the mentally infirm distrust that one is ongoing. Due to rules of process and the perpetrators waging war against the court it will likely never make a sound
512.
by cess11 11mo ago
Why change the subject?
513.
by cess11 11mo ago
Several reasons. For one we've broken the climate and poisoned our habitat, this will for sure cause major problems for existing power structures. We're not sure when, just that it will, eventually. There will be massive amounts o
514.
by cess11 11mo ago
They were widely distributed and there was no way for the israelis to know where they were when they detonated them, which they likely did out of desperation and not because they had good reason to believe they were in such and such a posit
515.
by cess11 11mo ago
Hezbollah members include medical personnel, teachers, politicians and so on. It is a much larger group of organisations than the armed factions. I'm not sure what you're after. What the israelis did would have been a worse crime
516.
by cess11 11mo ago
What would the implication of this nitpick be, in your opinion? Wasn't a consequence of this conclusion that the court ordered Israel to change its behaviour because it has an obligation to prevent genocide?
517.
by cess11 11mo ago
Yes. They formed as a militia to protect Lebanon against israeli invasion, because the relevant colonial powers did not allow the lebanese state to build enough of an army to protect its borders.
518.
by cess11 11mo ago
No, they did not. They also mainly used munitions that fly low and escape the israeli air defenses, which is why most of their targets were close to the border. Hezbollah is a movement that is many things, among them one of the dominant par
519.
by cess11 11mo ago
In WWII Germany was the genocidal aggressor, in this case Israel and its backers are the genocidal aggressors. Punishing a state for genocidal aggression is quite a bit more reasonable than the might is right-ideology you subscribe to. The
520.
by cess11 11mo ago
This was about as targeted as anti-personnel landmines, but spread out in civilian areas and detonated without any knowledge of their surroundings at the time. Because mines are untargeted and designed to maim without discrimination as to w
521.
by cess11 11mo ago
I did not write "all of these people". I pointed out that the state of Israel has refused to provide conditions for an investigation of what happened, and instead it has mainly been the press and leaks to the press that have shed
522.
by cess11 11mo ago
And East Jerusalem and the Gaza strip. I'd also argue that the occupations of Lebanon and Syria are illegal, and that taking control over the Philadelphi corridor was an act of war against Egypt. If you think such crimes of occupation
523.
by cess11 11mo ago
How did you come up with that tally? Israel has refused to comply with requests from international investigators into the matter, likely because a lot of the casualties were due to IDF actions. I remember the footage of "that young Ger
524.
by cess11 11mo ago
ICJ found the accusation plausible, and did later in another case conclude that the israeli occupation of palestinian land and apartheid is not lawful and must stop. Whether ICJ had found genocide perpetrated or just plausible does not matt
525.
by cess11 11mo ago
For one it wasn't targeted, but either way, if it, as you claim, was targeted then it would be even worse because it's worse to kill and maim kids by targeting them than by being indifferent.
526.
by cess11 11mo ago
Close to a hundred thousand israelis were evacuated from the north at the peak of it. Out of thousands of attacks something like 45 israeli civilians were killed, like when the IDF brought civilians to repair power lines and Hezbollah attac
527.
by cess11 11mo ago
Well, if that stops your thinking, maybe ponder the illegality of the israeli occupation of palestinian territory then. The israelis must withdraw their people from palestinian territories occupied in -67 and ought to pay reparations for bo
528.
by cess11 11mo ago
The northern settlements were largely evacuated and used by the IDF. The party to this conflict that systematically targets civilians is the state of Israel. One could make the argument that the US and Israel committing genocide makes param
529.
by cess11 11mo ago
Yeah, that's when you plant a bomb in a device and then make it beep and subsequently explode even though you have no idea whether it's in someone's home and a kid might pick it up to bring to a parent or perhaps in a crowded
530.
by cess11 11mo ago
Hence why I chose "had" for my previous comment.
531.
by cess11 11mo ago
If it wasn't indiscriminate, then they intentionally killed and maimed kids. It being indiscriminate would be the lesser evil out of these two options and it is unclear to me why you would prefer this interpretation of the events. My v
532.
by cess11 11mo ago
It's not something I've dabbled in but I think you could do something like that. If you look at https://re.factorcode.org/2015/06/bit-test.html and the vocabularies it links over to I'm sure you&#x2
533.
by cess11 11mo ago
Video from the incident: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-obhMBSWi4c BBC reporting: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1dzq41n4l9o The accused person claims to have panicked due to how the pol
534.
by cess11 11mo ago
get_magic_quotes_gpc() and mysql_real_escape_string() had quite a bit to teach in this area.
535.
by cess11 11mo ago
Whether intentional or not, one consequence of a success in this area would be to isolate older people from the views of young people and to stifle the younger generations influence on these communication media in the future. Personally I s
536.
by cess11 11mo ago
Here's a curl from my connection: $ curl -v letsdecrypt.org * Host letsdecrypt.org:80 was resolved. * IPv6: (none) * IPv4: 62.116.130.8 * Trying 62.116.130.8:80... * Connected to letsdecrypt.org (62.116.130.8) por
537.
by cess11 11mo ago
Listing five CLOUD Act corporations on the landing page as the "ecosystem" you're in does not exactly inspire confidence.
538.
by cess11 11mo ago
'You're claiming the UK lacks "freedom of speech" because it doesn't allow people to incite violence online, while saying the USA has free speech, despite it seemingly rejecting visitors for legal political speech.&
539.
by cess11 11mo ago
It's the other way around, the US wants Israel as an asset and is currently fighting to keep it one despite having been implicated in the accelerated genocide in Palestine, crime of aggression and so on. This is an extremely unpopular
540.
by cess11 11mo ago
Where would the exaggeration be? In that they're not 'aryanising' corporations and hence it's not an apt comparison?

More ›