Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cerved
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
57 ms
·
721.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
tbf I mostly do it for EBay type stuff
722.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
you'll find comments in the post explaining that he's facing the wrong direction
723.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
I always record unboxing anything I buy online, it's a convenient way of proof of something is missing out damaged
724.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
it pops up a lot and it's annoying as it's an invisible diff in git
725.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
huh?
726.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
yeah but not on this list
727.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
cat has been around for 49 years and 8 months, give or take a few days
728.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
tbh, I would feel better if the badge was "tested for 50 years on every system you can think of"
729.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
which is fine as long as the diffs don't overlap and you start moving them around
730.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
maybe if it helps to fail fast and only public functions
731.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
typiskt danskt att skicka massa knullsaker
732.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
you're not coming across as terribly polite
733.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
Braille keyboard looks dope
734.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
Kristel and Sonya seem to have the same due payments
735.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
I whole-heartedly agree with basically everything but feel compelled to point out that it's extremely hard to predict future needs. Nobody thinks their house is going to burn down until it does. Also, DALs are IMHO best practice for an
736.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
#5 is crucial, I highly value cross platform comparability. The existing differences are annoying enough as it is
737.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
There's a problem with being overly zealous. It's entirely possible to write bad code, either being overly dry or copy paste galore. I think we are prone to these zealous rules because they are concrete. We want an "objective
738.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
problem is you only diff if things look different
739.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
Partial classes is an ugly hack to mix human and machine generated source code. IMHO it should be avoided
740.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
I've been using a TV as screen for increased real estate and I must say I'm happy
741.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
my condolences
742.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
> Okay, bad example. I should have specified: Insert into an existing table, add the missing columns automatically. There are some special-cases where most database engines can automatically generate schemas, and "SELECT... INTO&quo
743.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
It was the logging part which puzzled me. The reason I asked about resources is because I have data generated by a personal project. The initial data model was sloppy and so now I'm finding myself having to backfill to clean the data a
744.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
Okay, I was confused as I thought you were referring to application logging and not logging that occurs in the data layer. With a normalized and well defined schema, such inconsistent data is impossible. I guess your point is then to have a
745.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
problem is they use bing translate /s
746.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
what's the relation to bugs in logging and analytics? I'm not sure I see it also, is there a good resource on how to backfill?
747.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
While schema creation SQL can be a be a bit unwieldy, I'm not sure I appreciate which part is the problem or what you're trying to achieve. Obviously you can SELECT * INTO FROM .. if you're just temporarily inserting data. I&
748.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
why would anyone ever want to do that?
749.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
it sounds like you're making an interesting point but I'm afraid I don't follow, could you elaborate?
750.
▲
by
cerved
5y ago
Not everybody has a DBA :(
More ›