ceroxylon

8 ms·

121.
by ceroxylon 1y ago
Is this not cognitive offload on steroids?
122.
by ceroxylon 1y ago
I had lunch with an entrepreneur with a "big idea" to convince major LLM platforms to feature ads in their answers, using businesses that they specify. It was a very short lunch.
123.
by ceroxylon 1y ago
According to the model card it is extremely fast, can be hijacked 25% of the time, has access to search tools, and has a propensity for dishonesty. I also think it is optimistic to think the jailbreak percentage will stay at "0.00&quot
124.
by ceroxylon 1y ago
Temperature plays a large role in fine tuning model output, you're correct that there is a theoretical sweet spot: https://towardsdatascience.com/a-comprehensive-guide-to-llm-...
125.
by ceroxylon 1y ago
> With this new decision, Anthropic makes this "free-riding" less attractive Certainly not for any users like you and me, it takes two seconds and three clicks to review the new terms and decline chat training. This is more lik
126.
by ceroxylon 1y ago
Same here, I thought it was going to be an analogy for a political story. Now that I know it is literal leeches and that the options are scraping them off or waiting for them to finish, avoiding areas with leeches feels like the move.
127.
by ceroxylon 1y ago
Agreed, I didn't mean to imply that they were even attempting to run the actual nano banana, even through LMarena. There is a whole spectrum of potential sketchiness to explore with these, since I see a few "sign in with Google&qu
128.
by ceroxylon 1y ago
I don't think it is that esoteric, that sounds like deepfake 101. If you don't mind answering, does Phind do anything to prevent / mitigate this?
129.
by ceroxylon 1y ago
It seems like every combination of "nano banana" is registered as a domain with their own unique UI for image generation... are these all middle actors playing credit arbitrage using a popular model name?
130.
by ceroxylon 1y ago
Interesting, but after my initial impressions I predict the results of the experiment will be "this is why we can't have nice things"
131.
by ceroxylon 1y ago
What about the people who did not opt to share or index their chats, and the companies that claim to not train on user chats? https://privacy.anthropic.com/en/articles/10023555-how-do-yo... > We do not actively
132.
by ceroxylon 1y ago
You reminded me of an awesome Google engineer I met at BSidesSF last year who tirelessly answered my questions, and when I clicked on the video, it was you! That was a really inspiring moment for me, thank you.
133.
by ceroxylon 1y ago
The generated graphic in the linked demo for "Training materials that captivate" is a sketch of someone looking forlorn while holding a piece of paper. Is there a way to do in-line edits to the generated result to polish out thing
134.
by ceroxylon 1y ago
Ah, I missed that detail, thank you for clarifying.
135.
by ceroxylon 1y ago
I am guessing that the Linux version was first (or the announcement was worded strangely), as it is available on their download page: https://ollama.com/download
136.
by ceroxylon 1y ago
"hello world" is tokenized differently than "HELLO WORLD", so caps definitely matter.
137.
by ceroxylon 1y ago
Jokes aside, it was interesting to me that the 'three horse race' excluded a company who is announcing 5GW data centers the size of Manhattan[0]. [0] https://techcrunch.com/2025/07/14/mark-zuckerberg
138.
by ceroxylon 1y ago
The output is very fast but many steps backwards in all of my personal benchmarks. Great tech but not usable in production when it is over 60% hallucinations.
139.
by ceroxylon 1y ago
Sam's last social media project included users verifying their humanity, so there is hope that something like that slips into the new platform.
140.
by ceroxylon 2y ago
This Cloudflare article claims that "Medium estimates" that 47% of its content is AI generated, while linking to a Wired article that states the number is from an analysis from Pangram Labs, and is disputed by Medium. This is the
141.
by ceroxylon 2y ago
Great to have my AM library accessible, but falls short for a couple big reasons: - Some of my best playlists were created using the mobile app, and AM seems to have a hard schism between its mobile and desktop versions (the playlists aren&
142.
by ceroxylon 2y ago
I disagree, it is unnecessarily verbose and seems to revolve around engagement.
143.
by ceroxylon 2y ago
"That is a pervert’s question." This whole article seems to be revolving around getting engagement and being verbose, they could have just said "rodent repelling tape exists and they put spice in it" and I would have rec
144.
by ceroxylon 2y ago
I agree, Youtube still feels like "this thing held your attention once so that's what you get eternally". The "refresh your feed" option appears occasionally but it only makes things worse and shows you the raw fire
145.
by ceroxylon 2y ago
If they're already getting money from selling their attention and being constantly surveilled, it will take a much larger temptation to move to a different hypnosis platform.
146.
by ceroxylon 2y ago
It is a complicated scene right now. Bots are taking over on both ends, both in creating and interpreting resumes. Companies can have ulterior motives for posting job ads in many directions, including just scraping data. My latest job searc
147.
by ceroxylon 2y ago
It would be worth it to build a highly refined and moderated "free tier", with a paid option that is even better. From what I noticed during my last job hunt, all the big platforms could vet their submissions better.
148.
by ceroxylon 2y ago
It feels like that already, most of the accounts that try to interact with me are bots. Dead internet, etc.
149.
by ceroxylon 2y ago
It helped me land my current position so I would say it is worth it. When someone is considering working with you, it is worth having something to point to that demonstrates your personality alongside your skills beyond what your resume can
150.
by ceroxylon 2y ago
It's cool and useful for granular editing, but tools like Kling, Sora, and Runway will make this step irrelevant in the next few years, in my opinion.

More ›