ceejayoz

7 ms·

91.
by ceejayoz 29d ago
The site is opusfived.com, and Opus 5 is probably the worst so far at doing this.
92.
by ceejayoz 29d ago
> Try that with some internal bureaucrat in an agency you've never heard of. https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/hearings/testimony-of-anthony-f... How many Americans had heard of internal bureaucrat Anthony Fauci and
93.
by ceejayoz 29d ago
They were overwhelmingly so. Millions protested, across the country and even overseas; dozens committed felonies of the sort you describe. Martin Luther King Jr. was subject to the same bullshit. https://www.reddit.com/r&#
94.
by ceejayoz 29d ago
With an asterisk on citizens, of course, that excludes Ellison. Do this to him and you'll likely be in deep trouble.
95.
by ceejayoz 29d ago
As long as you say "I feared for my life", you're apparently also allowed to shoot random civilians if you're a cop. Which is kinda why people are upset enough to set shit on fire.
96.
by ceejayoz 29d ago
> There is not generally an expectation of privacy in public. Surely we can agree the point of this technology is to change the level of privacy one should reasonably expect in public?
97.
by ceejayoz 29d ago
> It refuses to say anything that isn't verifiably correct, and if you get it into a logical inconsistency it essentially throws and error and doesn't elaborate further… And if you give a human, or an LLM, a logical inconsisten
98.
by ceejayoz 29d ago
> Have all these things become reality? Quite a few of 'em. Communicators and commbadges became smartphones. PADDs are iPads. The ship's computer is a LLM (with the weird inhuman blindspots to questions, even).
99.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
Oh yeah? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19155947/
100.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
FDA: “You’ve got E. coli in here.” “Yes.”
101.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
> Surely you would expect the rate of change to drop off after a time, right? Why would you expect that, when societal change historically accelerates over time? > The process for amending the Constitution hasn’t changed any. In the
102.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
> The plaintiffs claimed this was a 14th amendment issue, but at the time the 14th was added cholera outbreaks were still somewhat common in the US and there was no remote notion of safe drinking water provided universally by municipal g
103.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
And?
104.
Divergent betacoronavirus with functional furin cleavage site in S.American bats(nature.com)
3 points by ceejayoz 1mo ago|0 comments
105.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
A NSL seems more likely.
106.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
> Just keep in mind that chronic lead poisoning does not cause death or even shorten lives. This is patently false. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11069331/ > Oh no, they can end your life too. But
107.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
So the legal theory is the government can shorten your life as long as they don't outright end it? That seems like a novel one.
108.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
> Yes, the constitution promises life. But it does not promise a safe life, or a secure life, or even an unpoisoned life. It does promise the government can't take it from you without due process.
109.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
> It wouldn't have taken decades. We've had vaccination/innoculation for centuries and people still don't accept it.
110.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
> also have to respect the Bill of Rights The Bill of Rights is just the first ten. Incorporation has been extended far further than that. Per the link: "However, the post–Civil War era, beginning in 1865 with the Thirteenth Amendme
111.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
> The city is not a State Oh, come on. This is tortured logic that would argue the Fourth Amendment doesn't apply to most police departments in the country and that town school boards could violate the First Amendment and have relig
112.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
Government officials intentionally giving someone lead poisoning is depriving them of life. I'm 100% fine with "there's no Constitutional requirement for a jurisdiction to provide a water supply" - plenty of folks live o
113.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
> You cannot legally demand what physically is not there. But you can demand what is provided to you by public utility isn't knowingly and secretly poisoned with a neurotoxin.
114.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
It says several things, including this: "nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" One might argue they're not required to provide water, but I'd argue this means t
115.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
> The Constitution establishes the Federal government. Not state, county, city, municipal governments. This is about a hundred years out of date. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorporation_of_the_Bill_of_R...
116.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
> fundamental rights can never depend on the work of other people So public defenders and public school teachers aren't a thing? Jury duty can't be compelled? Conscription like in WWII?
117.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
Vessels is a bit of an odd thing to focus on, frankly. I'm largely not allowed to own a fully armed tank, fighter jet, or howitzer. (With a few strictly controlled exceptions; https://www.skiutah.com/blog/authors&#
118.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
> The 14th not covering clean water at the time it was written is not because they didn't have germ theory. That was the legal theory upthread. Which I contest. > Second, the 2nd is a lot clearer than the 14th. "nor shall an
119.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
> The Constitution expressly authorized Congress to grant letters of marque… the government commissioned privateers... So Congress had a certain level of... control? Over guns?
120.
by ceejayoz 1mo ago
> It just establishes that there are rights not listed in the Constitution. It provides no help whatsoever in determine what those rights are. The opinion is asserting a government intentionally allowing lead poisoning does "not inf

More ›