Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ceejayoz
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
31.
▲
by
ceejayoz
10d ago
I wish I knew, but I've definitely seen it happen. "What does this bit mean?" "I dunno."
32.
▲
by
ceejayoz
10d ago
> You're hanging a lot of weight on birth rates… https://knowyourmeme.com/sensitive/memes/the-writers-barely-...
33.
▲
by
ceejayoz
10d ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannibal_Directive
34.
▲
by
ceejayoz
11d ago
> Was it ethnic cleansing the way we persecuted and prosecuted Nazis post WW2? No, just as it wouldn't be ethnic cleansing to evict one Jewish person. We convicted a relatively tiny handful of Nazis. https://en.wikipedia.
35.
▲
by
ceejayoz
11d ago
Oh, come on. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews > Jews, or the Jewish people, are an ethnoreligious group and nation, originating in the Israelites of ancient Israel and Judah. If the US forcibly kicked Jews out o
36.
▲
by
ceejayoz
11d ago
What would you say the average ethnicity of a Nazi typically was?
37.
▲
by
ceejayoz
11d ago
That's the "Turtle is purple ice cream 203-B" thing again. It's flatly non-responsive to the question.
38.
▲
by
ceejayoz
11d ago
> similar to how Nazi isn't an ethnicity The people super-focused on "Aryan heritage" didn't have an ethnic bent? Huh. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_racial_theories
39.
▲
by
ceejayoz
11d ago
> you live in a society which is non-viable I'm not certain "start a war with half the region that gets the other friendlier half of the region's entire economic engine blown up by Iran" counts as viable in the long
40.
▲
by
ceejayoz
11d ago
A definition of "zionist" that excludes Chuck Schumer is a bit odd. Can you link a commonly accepted definition - encyclopedia, dictionary, what have you - saying that it requires immediate migration?
41.
▲
by
ceejayoz
11d ago
Now we're advocating ethnic cleansing of Zionist Jews from New York City?
42.
▲
by
ceejayoz
11d ago
> Can you explain to me how that’s fascism? "We have lots of babies so it can't be fascism" is a really out-there argument I'm having trouble following. It's like posting "Turtle is purple ice cream 203-B&qu
43.
▲
by
ceejayoz
11d ago
Sounds a little fashy. Is it not possible to want to improve one's country?
44.
▲
by
ceejayoz
11d ago
> The EU is specifically European - its in the name. I don't disagree , but by this standard North Korea is a democratic republic, and Turkey's membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is a bit odd.
45.
▲
by
ceejayoz
11d ago
> Our immigration process is non political - it’s run by a government department who write, publish and enforce our policies. This is a deeply unserious claim. You could make a claim for it being setup as non- partisan . But non-politica
46.
▲
by
ceejayoz
11d ago
> We’re not interested in joining the EU. The article isn't about joining the EU (as the original post you replied to called it, "unlikely anyway"). > But trade doesn’t need to go all the way to DC. Nor Brussels; Pert
47.
▲
by
ceejayoz
11d ago
Brussels and DC are almost the same distance from Canberra. (Also Australian, but living in the US.) https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/southeast-asia-pacific/au... > U.S. goods and services (exports plus impor
48.
▲
by
ceejayoz
11d ago
Sometimes, cultures democratically decide "hey we shouldn't be responsible for another World War and Holocaust" is worth legislating. Sometimes, democracy needs defending from people using its privileges to get rid of it.
49.
▲
by
ceejayoz
11d ago
You have the same right to apply for asylum. "as an Australian" claims of escaping persecution and violence might be slightly harder to sustain. That's a good thing for Australia.
50.
▲
by
ceejayoz
11d ago
It happened, it was a war crime, and they were bad guys. The response happened, is a (ongoing) giant pile of war crimes, and Netanyahu and his settler friends are bad guys. Both of these can be true simultaneously.
51.
▲
by
ceejayoz
11d ago
> I document a dominant narrative consistent with a framing that assigns near-exclusive agency and responsibility to Israel... Gosh, it's almost like they're the occupying power with an overwhelming weaponry advantage. > Ano
52.
▲
by
ceejayoz
12d ago
A combination of guardrails - the spec stage is required to give me a mockup for UI work, it has to make failing tests for bug fixes, etc. - and adversarial reviews ensuring the lazy fuckers don't just give up half way through. 20-30 a
53.
▲
by
ceejayoz
12d ago
> The author of the comment higher up is describing a person who is boycotting X because they are strongly against its stewardship and moderation but regardless continues to find ways to indulge themselves in the content produced by user
54.
▲
by
ceejayoz
12d ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=photomatt Page 24, for example: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.43...
55.
▲
by
ceejayoz
12d ago
> Every single one of them I saw so far has the same bad faith attacks, claiming that that guy's mental health would be compromised… That's because the substantive discussion happened in 2024 when this whole mess started. He wa
56.
▲
by
ceejayoz
12d ago
Which is just the "yet you participate in society" meme again.
57.
▲
by
ceejayoz
14d ago
Or you've just not been paying attention. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/24/states-sue-t...
58.
▲
by
ceejayoz
14d ago
The Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause would seem to disagree in this scenario.
59.
▲
by
ceejayoz
14d ago
> You'll note that the Senate was controlled by Mitch McConnell when the American Rescue Plan Act was voted on. Please, read the posts you're replying to. I gave a clear example proving that they can indeed do so. Biden's
60.
▲
by
ceejayoz
14d ago
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/23/trump-denies-disast... > The president has approved just 23 percent of blue state requests for disaster aid, compared to 89 percent for red states. He seems to
More ›