ceejayoz

17 ms·

451.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
> With what, sharpened sticks? Deniable, asymmetrical attacks? Look what Ukraine did to Russia's air bases with a couple truckloads of drones.
452.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
> Russia can't even take the country next door. Neither could the Weimar Republic. > With a bunch of rusty nukes that almost certainly no longer work, and that would get their (relatively few) major population centers vaporized
453.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
Unless China has some very interesting new anti-drone tech, those look like nice big targets.
454.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/russia-nato-arms-germany-wa... > Germany's defence minister is frank and plain-spoken, but also deliberate with his words and intention. When he talks about Russia, the fut
455.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
The subject of "Why is everyone preparing for war so hard" would seem to be "everyone", no?
456.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
Everything you just said describes the major American AI providers. Anthropic just settled a $1.5B suit over it!
457.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
When both are true at the same time, one might reflect on why "because China" is given as the pat answer.
458.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
> The Wing of Tomorrow programme is centred around creating longer, lighter, and more slender wings to maximise aerodynamic efficiency and reduce fuel burn. The wing extensions will be assembled at Airbus’ Wing Technology Development Cen
459.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
> it has also become an entirely cliché response To be fair, that's also the case for the link itself we're discussing.
460.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
A shitty cam rip of a movie is still punishable as infringement. That said, it's been done: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02671 > In some cases, jailbroken Claude 3.7 Sonnet outputs entire books near-verbatim (e.g
461.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
Anthropic pirated that content to help everyone do the same .
462.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
I can't speak for California, but here in my area of NY you show up, give your name and address, which they find in the registered voters list, and you sign on an iPad that gets checked against the signature on file. Then you get hande
463.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
> There are lot of assumptions in that statement which may not be scientifically valid. Uh huh. > Even if, the patient's life should not outweigh the medico's own. Their desire not to get a minor vaccination should not outw
464.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
> They could simply ban medical institutions from mandating treatments for staff… Sorry, but if you want to take care of patients, you don't get to risk their lives unnecesssarily by refusing a flu shot.
465.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
We called them Sturmabteilung in the original German.
466.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
> Is it all going to insurance companies? Nope. The price increases are attributable to hospitals, doctors, pharmaceutical companies and so on. The insurers are buying up the doctors (and paying their doctors more, as a bonus - https:
467.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
> Maybe not according to your personal definition. Not according to any common definition. I, too, can win every argument if I get to make up the definitions. > compulsory collective charity Compulsory makes it not charity. That&#x2
468.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
> government assistance That's not charity!
469.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
> I’m not making a point about UK wait times; we’re talking about LLMs as a research tool. And I'm noting that what and how you ask matter. (As do the basic factual flubs they make. I use LLMs a lot on code! I don't trust LLM
470.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
US healthcare costs are $16k/person/year. I do not think charity makes up a particularly signficant portion of that cost, no.
471.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
We know it has a genetic factor. We also know that's not the full story, and that people who lose a parent at a young age for any reason are more likely to struggle emotionally.
472.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
> Committing suicide almost certainly guarantees further suicides within that close family. Not sure why this is downvoted. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-... "The experience o
473.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
> No one is making the claim that the cost of service would be $0. Quite obviously. I am making the claim that the cost will be prohibitive to handle via charity, especially as a national healthcare strategy, as proposed upthread.
474.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
Great example! I go and ask Gemini about the American equivalent, and get this: > Roughly 40% of the U.S. population resides in federally designated Mental Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs). The shortfall is severe: the national
475.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
I can assure you it wouldn't be $0, or anywhere near close to that. My kiddos were born the day before the third trimester and spent two months in the hospital. Staff it at minimum wage, cap the costs at just the stuff used, and you&#x
476.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
LLMs are notoriously good at getting even basic facts wrong. Especially when the information ecosystem around the issue is... adversarial.
477.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
So everyone had their healthcare needs addressed in the 1800s? Which charities have the funding to cover a $1M NICU stay?
478.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
> I don't consider it a possibility that state of mind would not have been a result of his mistreatment. Why? There are very well treated people who still get suicidal.
479.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
> This article makes a good case for the abolition of health insurance. Yes. > If everybody had to pay for medical care, medical care would need to be affordable to survive. How would people with zero income afford it?
480.
by ceejayoz 3mo ago
Why do you trust Gemini to do that?

More ›