cee_el123

7 ms·

31.
by cee_el123 5y ago
that account was created minutes ago regardless of all else GDC7 appears determined to contradict reality in all threads, and of course, without any supporting data source: their comments on other threads
32.
by cee_el123 5y ago
Should it be so easy for anyone to market their products with the Wright name ?
33.
by cee_el123 5y ago
I sincerely recommend you go test your hypotheses out in the field.
34.
by cee_el123 5y ago
I sincerely recommend you go test your hypotheses out in the field.
35.
by cee_el123 5y ago
no most of those 8 billion are just trying to put food on the table by whatever means - relevance is probably the last thing on their mind - you can't blame people for trying to survive yes everything in this capitalism dominated world
36.
by cee_el123 5y ago
Even the necessary level of reforestation at this stage would probably amount to geoengineering - CO2 is only one of the many ways we are wrecking the planet, countless small, unique ecosystems at a time
37.
by cee_el123 5y ago
if the masses realized/felt that their life sucks - they would revolt already against the status quo or maybe not, since upper classes will swiftly deal with it and go back to being miserable about their first world problems
38.
by cee_el123 6y ago
seems to me - what's described here probably is this : here is evidence that localisation applies well even at the level of small neural groups
39.
by cee_el123 6y ago
I did like biology but at the time couldn't connect it with the impact the field creates in human living. today I'm obsessed with understanding proteins because predicting protein structure, behaviour, interaction are really hard
40.
by cee_el123 6y ago
off topic - without a comma between life and developed, my first thought was that this is about some sort of artificial life developed in Switzerland
41.
by cee_el123 6y ago
it does tend to optimise for survivability - not that it consciously intends to - but because survivability leads to survival, and survival in combination with lucky mutations leads to developing more survivability... and so on
42.
by cee_el123 6y ago
https://www.amazon.com/Fundamentals-Protein-Structure-Functi... there's another book called cell biology by Alberts et al
43.
by cee_el123 6y ago
Just to add to the usual arguments against this, please take a look at this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis especially the "Primordial origin of biomolecules" section You may also enjoy read
44.
by cee_el123 6y ago
for those who are ready for a deep dive - https://www.amazon.com/Fundamentals-Protein-Structure-Functi...
45.
by cee_el123 6y ago
Awesome ! As a programmer starting to get acquainted with the stupendous complexity of life at the molecular level - I'm hoping there's many more of us in the months and years to come. It's not possible to overstate the impor
46.
by cee_el123 6y ago
Awesome.. been looking for something like this since 2 days
47.
by cee_el123 8y ago
What representations does Google use to store such a humongous amount of geospatial data ?
48.
by cee_el123 8y ago
I'm a beginner violinist who for a long time looked warily at the fact that robot violinists who'll play better than us aren't more than a few decades away. But I realize nowadays that technology isn't just about automat
49.
by cee_el123 8y ago
Amazon owns Kiva which automates warehouse management
50.
by cee_el123 8y ago
I guess 50 yrs is too dire. However IMO the direst predictions you refer to are probably assuming a continuation of the current levels of resource consumption/ecosystem destruction. But IMO it's far more likely that resource consu
51.
by cee_el123 8y ago
The underlying problem with all of this is that money is a poorly designed mechanism for (1) exchange of services (almost all goods are the result of services) between people (2) apportioning of natural resources which really belong to no
52.
by cee_el123 8y ago
I think this is correct as long as survival is a personal goal. However IMO civilization overall needs all the scientific and technological advancement possible, and then some more - if it is to survive beyond the next 50-60 years. ( 50-60
53.
by cee_el123 10y ago
So much beauty in the presentation.