Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cbr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
127 ms
·
1111.
▲
by
cbr
15y ago
I'm not sure his native language is english; he may be swedish.
1112.
▲
by
cbr
16y ago
This doesn't seem all that different from the way car companies run multiple makes. Chevy vs Saturn. Philosophies are totally different (or at least they were) but the market is the same. This way the company does well whichever approac
1113.
▲
by
cbr
16y ago
> Nowhere does it say they council changed its restrictions due to the chess club. Actually no: "Soon afterwards, the student government relaxed the rules to let clubs have lunch sales more days per week."
1114.
▲
by
cbr
17y ago
Stemware?
1115.
▲
by
cbr
17y ago
Just read the full article. It's no good. Analyzing ASL in terms of hand shapes only, on the grounds that they're the only feature that all linguists looking at ASL seem to agree on is really problematic. Computation of entropy is heavil
1116.
▲
by
cbr
17y ago
Calling asl "signed english" is usually a good indication that the writer doesn't know much about the subject. Then they go on to say: > "It turns out that the information content of handshapes is on average just 0.5 bits per handshape
1117.
▲
by
cbr
17y ago
The main downsides to PDF are that it is not supported in all browsers, especially mobile or embedded ones and even in the browsers where it is supported, it is implemented as a plugin and so is slow to load. PDFs open in 3sec on this compu
1118.
▲
by
cbr
17y ago
Or simpler: you solve problem X, making you code as clean, documented, and extensible as you can. Then a team member has to extend it to solve X', where X' is designed to show up bugs in the solution for X (turkish language insteadof engli
1119.
▲
by
cbr
17y ago
I'm confused by the assertion that a source code audit would catch nothing. Even if the auditors didn't know that the check would be optimised away, the code is very unnatural. Normally you check if a pointer is NULL and then deference it
1120.
▲
by
cbr
17y ago
You can do ", ".join(x) on any x that you can do "for y in x" on. If join were a method of the list (or sequence, or iterator, ...) then it would need to be defined over and over again.