Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cbg0
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
121.
▲
Volkswagen planning to cut up to 100.000 jobs globally
(bbc.com)
37 points
by
cbg0
3mo ago
|
53 comments
122.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
In the past they received a lot of hate for not comparing to the competition.
123.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
5.6 Terra (mid tier model) as good as Fable on DeepSWE while cheaper than Opus API pricing. Seems like a homerun.
124.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
Hy3 DeepSWE - 28% GPT5.4 xhigh DeepSWE - 52% A lot of contaminated benchmarks in the blog post about Hy3, needs real testing though I have a distinct feeling it's benchmaxxed like a lot of Chinese models.
125.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
You should be relieved that they're sending robots instead of you to get blown up by a drone.
126.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
Assuming these concerns were real you could just turn the app into a website.
127.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
It looks like some of these systems do work, why shouldn't we try these systems too? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002243752...
128.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
> How would these laws prevent me from just side loading my own open source client? They do not.
129.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
This will not get triggered by blind spot checks and most new cars have these inside the mirrors, so you won't even need to look over your shoulder.
130.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
Personal freedom to fall asleep at the wheel or look at your phone while driving?
131.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
It works, but there are mechanisms to also track your head position if it can't see your eyes.
132.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
The GDPR protects people from companies keeping their data and using it recklessly.
133.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
Perfect is the enemy of good. If it prevents some people from falling a sleep and causing an accident that's excellent.
134.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
Preventing car crashes and people dying in said crashes isn't an unhealthy obsession with safety.
135.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
Better in what way? Does it follow the goals better, does the code produce have higher quality in a testable/maintainable sense or is it just closer to how you would usually program something?
136.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
I've seen this with GPT, and I usually ask it to put together a more easy to understand document for a specific target audience or reading level and it seems to do okay.
137.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
> This is because GPT-5.6 is just a more posttrained version of GPT-5.5, not a bigger model than GPT-5.5. What is this very confident assumption based on?
138.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
I'm neither an old man, nor am I grumpy at the new tools. I use AI daily, I'm just not deluded into thinking AI is more capable than it is, or myself for that matter.
139.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
> We're accelerating at lightning speed now. Accelerating how much slop you can output? A better model will still produce slop for your feature factory that pumps out software which nobody is interested in buying.
140.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
It's a post on twitter, not a press release.
141.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
Talk about overreacting.
142.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
This is an intermittent issue, you should still be able to get your work done. 5.5 was released two months ago so perhaps you're using 5.5 wrong and some things that worked in 5.4 require tweaking your prompts?
143.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
Doesn't look like it: https://marginlab.ai/trackers/codex/
144.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
You want a refund because of a problem you weren't even aware of until now? And you don't even really know if your work has been impacted by this problem.
145.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
I'm not sure I follow; they were given 90 days to comply with certain requirements from the EU, which they did, and the fine was something extra that took a while to resolve in the courts.
146.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
This approach is more US-centric than "HN people". I've heard this often with phrases like "better to ask for forgiveness than for permission" which is probably because you can get away with a lot more on the busine
147.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
> No, they're OK with Google apparently not changing much of anything and being allowed to continue operating so long as they pay the fine first. This is false. They were asked to: - Stop tying Google Search and Chrome to the Play
148.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
The point of fines is to correct behavior, not to cause financial ruin.
149.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
Do you really believe the EU needs to "disguise" taxes? And that a $23 trillion economy wants to wait 8 years to collect $4.7 billion?
150.
▲
by
cbg0
3mo ago
Nothing's stopping them from doing that, but you're incredibly naive if you think they're "protecting the average user" out of the goodness of their heart.
More ›