cbd1984

76 ms·

751.
by cbd1984 12y ago
> What is needed is law school graduate employment numbers broken down by undergrad degree. It's too easy to game these numbers if law schools give their grads little temporary (not necessarily temp) jobs right out of school and the
752.
by cbd1984 12y ago
Given that OpenCores has a ton of open-source cores on it already, why does this matter? http://opencores.org/
753.
by cbd1984 12y ago
Because why not: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/alt.folklore.computers... ACM Fellow for Reinventing Virtual Machines: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.folklore.compute.
754.
by cbd1984 12y ago
Sounds like LibOS: https://lwn.net/Articles/637658/ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9259292 Or Service Virtual Machines: http://alt.folklore.computers.narkive.com/LXzjsdU7&#x2
755.
by cbd1984 12y ago
Therefore, the conspiracy must be massive and absolutely flawless to make so many scientists think it's not Literally Satan. It all comes together. It all makes sense. I bet it can't melt steel beams, either. /s
756.
by cbd1984 12y ago
Agreed. I was half-imagining an in-house railway system made of Lego pieces, somehow.
757.
by cbd1984 12y ago
Working link: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/2770
758.
by cbd1984 12y ago
The Golden Age is when you're twelve. Always. Regardless of generation.
759.
by cbd1984 12y ago
"Loser" here means... >50% liable for what happened? Civil suits don't always have 'winners' and 'losers' in the same way criminal cases do, and even if this specific concept doesn't apply here, it
760.
by cbd1984 12y ago
What makes this file(1) safer than any other?
761.
by cbd1984 12y ago
> many distros have already jumped on the systemd wagon Odd. If systemd is so Objectively Terrible (the general tenor of these posts: systemd is bad, it's obviously bad, with no redeeming features whatsoever), why is that happening?
762.
by cbd1984 12y ago
> 1 adverbs. Aim for 0 or fewer. Yes, the app is apparently quite insane. It's classic Strunk & White nonsense, the idea that simpler (even to the point of being simplistic ) is always, always, always better, founded on the u
763.
by cbd1984 12y ago
It seems like there's a conversation we're not having here, and a few people should not be allowed to force us to not have it.
764.
by cbd1984 12y ago
> I'm not sure a company can be personally sued. Depending on what you mean by "personally sued", this is one of the main reasons limited liability corporations exist: So the shareholders aren't personally responsible
765.
by cbd1984 12y ago
So if a man got passed over and a woman got the promotion, would the man have a good case, in your eyes? How about if they were both the same gender?
766.
by cbd1984 12y ago
> an individual who had good faith claims How do you know this?
767.
by cbd1984 12y ago
Deterministic but too hard to predict is a form of non-determinism, as far as humans are concerned.
768.
by cbd1984 12y ago
If you think that's what's happening, you haven't been paying attention.
769.
by cbd1984 12y ago
Yep, it's so lucky for you that you just happened to have been born into the last generation that was really, truly human , isn't it?
770.
by cbd1984 12y ago
If you think the BBC is not influenced by its funding source, I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
771.
by cbd1984 12y ago
This link comes with a bit more context about Mel and the machine he programmed: http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/story-of-mel.html
772.
by cbd1984 12y ago
But not the version with context.
773.
by cbd1984 12y ago
I explicitly mentioned that opcode. By name, even.
774.
by cbd1984 12y ago
Read the page I linked to in the other subthread. djb never used a license.
775.
by cbd1984 12y ago
Intel syntax has more intuitive memory access syntax: AT&T syntax: movl mem_location(%ebx,%ecx,4), %eax Intel syntax: mov eax, [ebx + ecx*4 + mem_location] The other differences are minor compared to that, IMHO. https
776.
by cbd1984 12y ago
Real programmers have been using virtual machines since CP-40. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_CP-40
777.
by cbd1984 12y ago
> My point is that you can't get away with not licensing your free software djb did, before he released everything (or practically everything?) into the public domain. Look for my other comment thread to see the practical results of
778.
by cbd1984 12y ago
> Is public domain a license, or is it no license? Public domain means nobody owns the copyright to that work. Anyone can use it for any purpose whatsoever, because there's nobody to tell them they can't. So, no, it's not
779.
by cbd1984 12y ago
> ...are you arguing with yourself? You don't? No, I'm expanding on my thoughts. I explained the general idea first, and then described what was actually going on. The fact they don't know what a license is doesn't in
780.
by cbd1984 12y ago
I read the page: > You are free to use this software in any way, for any purpose. This is a license. It can't possibly be anything else. It's a simple, permissive license, but it's a license. Them claiming it isn't a

More ›