Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
causal
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
22 ms
·
301.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
But banning accounts wholesale is not going to earn them more customers. They could have just disabled Gemini access, or even given a warning first. I don't use OpenClaw, I do pay hundreds per month for AI subscriptions, and I will not
302.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
AWS has so many internal gates, it quickly devolves into Kafkaesque hell if you get off the happy path. We had an account which was flagged as suspicious because we...signed up to use credits that AWS offered us, which apparently immediatel
303.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
Doesn't AWS make you agree to arbitration? Unsure how Small Claims Courts plays with that.
304.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
Agents may not consider themselves LLMs, might include some other tags to grab an OpenClaw agent's attention
305.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
Harder when it's an email from the CEO
306.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
Yep. You took out much of the meaning and wrapped it in stylistic fluff.
307.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
Many have tried, it does not work. Regression to the mean always sets in.
308.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
I’m not convinced removing RLHF would really make the probabilities generator give us distributions that can diverge from the mean while remaining useful. In other words, this might not a problem that can be overcome in LLMs alone.
309.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
I find it extremely difficult to focus on any piece of writing the moment I see the patterns. Can’t tell if it’s an attitude problem I need to get over or if it’s just that all AI writing really is that bad.
310.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
AI has a way of convincing people they are onto something big, they just can't quite express the idea themselves so here's the output pasted verbatim
311.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
Very funny
312.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
Agreed... I'm not at the top.
313.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
Did you mean decrease in your last sentence? Or do you simply mean any solution will make the problem worse?
314.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
I mean most of us certainly don't have that kind of authority, and that's not really going to stop AI use when it comes embedded in every service these days.
315.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
Verifiability is part of it, but I think the "semantic ablation" article on the front page really captures my problem with AI-washed writing: https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/16/semantic_ablation_
316.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
No sir
317.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
YES this hits the nail on something I've been trying to express for some time now. Semantic ablation: love it, going to use that a lot not now when arguing why someone's ChatGPT-washed email sucks. Semantic ablation is also why I&
318.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
Fair but I have seen workplaces keep phone use largely curtailed. Surely it's not so impossible with AI...right? Right...? :/
319.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
Yeah if the prompt is as specific as this post, then that's probably the issue...
320.
▲
Ask HN: How do you motivate your humans to stop AI-washing their emails?
30 points
by
causal
8mo ago
|
35 comments
321.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
Thanks for sharing that anecdote. I think everyone is susceptible to misinformation, and seniors might be especially unprepared to adapt to LLMs tricks.
322.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
> there is almost nothing that a human is better at than Opus 4.6. > You wouldn't expect a Jr. dev to be the best at keeping things dry either. So a junior dev is better than almost all humans at everything?
323.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
I'm countering the basis of your original claim; "there is almost nothing that a human is better at than Opus 4.6". This is simply not true.
324.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
I fear that AI will be intelligent enough to negate human general intelligence before it is itself generally intelligent.
325.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
This is my greatest cause for alarm regarding LLM adoption. I am not yet sure AI will ever be good enough to use without experts watching them carefully; but they are certainly good enough that non-experts cannot tell the difference.
326.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
> violates DRY in unholy ways Well said
327.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
Opus is the very best and I still throw away most of what it produces. If I did not carefully vet its work I would degrade my code bases so quickly. To accurately measure the value of AI you must include the negative in your sum.
328.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
Yup and it's clearly getting attention.
329.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
> The project is abandoned but it still works well Hard deal breaker. And alternative keyboards in iOS feel second class in some ways, so we really rely on Apple to get it right.
330.
▲
by
causal
8mo ago
Switching from Android, I was shocked by how much in fact did not just work. I kept a running list of basic features that were clearly broken. Especially around text editing. It seems like they made some fundamental mistakes with their text
More ›