Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
caturopath
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
That doesn't seem to be the case at all. A lot of the sympathetic content occurs _after_ the scandal and arrest, and Lewis has continued to take the same tone in interviews. Further, an inordinate amount of time is dedicated earlier in
62.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
They aren't suggesting they'll charge appreciably more; they are suggesting they'll charge the same in different ways.
63.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
I'm not sure this is the message of this story. There are tons of computer systems involved under single-payer systems.
64.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
*offended or pleased by _how well_ the leader manages...
65.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
I am a lot more offended or pleased by whether the leader manages a 60MM budget and a 1B endowment than their 500k salary. There's this weird thing where charities are judged by how much they cost to run and pay their employees to even
66.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
Headlines get changed to things that actually reflect the link's content all the time. Is flagging not a way for users to try to get that done? (I would have guessed so, but I honestly don't know. I certainly didn't flag this
67.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
Though the headline is sadly correct, the article is about a study that is random crap that doesn't speak to the well-known issue.
68.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
It's almost as if clicking on photos with a mouse isn't a very good way to measure night walking behavior, isn't it?
69.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
That would tell us a lot about where participants from their pool click on images, but I'm not sure it tells us anything about any questions worth caring about. We all know that women are and must be more wary while doing things like w
70.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
It's sweet you are willing to be so generous, but I think you are just being optimistic about how bad the state of external validity in social science research is.
71.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
> Each participant looked at 16 images and were told to imagine themselves walking through those areas. Jesus Christ. I'm not sure what that tells us, but not much. If the labels on the heatmaps were reversed, I wonder if I would ha
72.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
Love Think Python, I have recommended it to so many learners: it balances the various concerns of a new programmer book really well. Allen Downey has a bunch of other books with somewhat similar approaches too https://greenteapre
73.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
I feel for your particular situation, but I don't think this explains the overall situation. Lower-income people within a country seem to have more kids in general: this is very much the case for the US. People with higher incomes and
74.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
I know that feeling and I'm sorry to hear about your frustration. That being said, I think the critique you're getting may be more fair to your post than you think. You bring up things like college debt and high medical costs, whi
75.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
I think this is very confused. People these days are really rich compared to people in the past who had more kids, poorer people in countries like the US have more kids on average than richer ones, and poorer countries on average have more
76.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
Why not just increase power to the main deflector?
77.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
Instead, just don't suck
78.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-robot-vacuum...
79.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
I hoped this article would be better than the title, but it wasn't.
80.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
> If you’re a normal person you’re better off just going offline and seeking actual connections. The majority of US folks find relationship partners via apps these days. It's nearly the only actively-looking place remaining.
81.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
This is among those topics where I don't expect the opposite result to be reported.
82.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
I expect you think you're thinking clearly, but you're not.
83.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
Right. So, an explanation would describe why it works the way it does in practice. Lots of people have tried in this comment section and article to provide such explanations. I don't think what you're doing provides a "why&qu
84.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
That is not really an explanation. You are just stating how things are in a non-explanatory way. > should expect Should why, though? You didn't explain why they should have this expectation, rather than any other. > There's
85.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
Google's daycare wasn't particularly on-site. When I was there I had lots of coworkers with small kids and I can't recall any of them using the company daycare rather than normal daycare. I think TFA says there were like 300
86.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
I mostly use Google web search, too, but I've found that Bing is the first search engine actually at the same level.
87.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
This is a research report, and despite the recommendation being about as non-harmful as you can get, it shouldn't be used for health advice. Even systematic literature reviews are a stretch for health advice as opposed to tertiary sour
88.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
I'm pretty sympathetic to both Amsterdam's 30km/h thing (and the campaigns for 20mph speed limits for most streets in many cities in the US) and Texas' 75mph-standard, lots-of-80 and -85mph areas policy. These are comple
89.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
e-bikes are limited to slower than that, and the prevailing style of acoustic bike in .nl is hard to get past 30km/h.
90.
▲
by
caturopath
3y ago
I think the expectation is that they will eventually traffic calm the streets until people really go 30km/h. (Or speed a little, probably not 40 km/h.) FWIW, 20mph school zones seem to be becoming more common in the US.
More ›