catshirt

37 ms·

361.
by catshirt 12y ago
tell that to the robots
362.
by catshirt 12y ago
seriously, please stop kicking the robots
363.
by catshirt 12y ago
gotchya. i don't mean to sound accusatory- i am just being selfish. there are bits and pieces of Composer that i'd like to see in Backbone proper. but, the thought of leaving Backbone for something a lot like Backbone is scary.
364.
by catshirt 12y ago
i'm confused by this. the reason for creating an entire framework is you didn't like the jQuery dependency? replacing jQuery with MooTools in Backbone seems trivial, especially with respect to creating a whole new framework. you
365.
by catshirt 12y ago
> The Chrome plugin looks very nice, but you can do the same thing with console.log() outputs in your store. by that logic, you don't need a debugger with breakpoints and stack traces either. i mean... you could use a spoon for driv
366.
by catshirt 12y ago
of course a profound technical concept will provoke questions regarding its technical feasibility. so what is your point? that it's impossible? that it shouldn't be attempted? that it's not a problem worth working through?
367.
by catshirt 12y ago
31 is approximately 30
368.
by catshirt 12y ago
ah, point taken. i didn't think too hard about this apparently. if they had a host serving a list of trusted DAs, that host would be just as valuable a target.
369.
by catshirt 12y ago
thanks for a thoughtful response. your analysis is correct. but, given that the article convinced me of nothing, further posing the question "does gender really matter" seems fair as well. i thought my intent was clear when i expl
370.
by catshirt 12y ago
just because they need a list of nodes doesn't mean they need to be hardcoded into the client. the other option of course would be to fetch the list remotely.
371.
by catshirt 12y ago
"The interactions in the AMA itself showed that gender does still matter." does it really? it sounds like if their gender was omitted in the first place, the topic would not have been breached. i'm not saying their conclusion
372.
by catshirt 12y ago
"I also understand that this list of trusted DA's is hardcoded into Tor clients" forgive my ignorance, why would they do this in the first place? fear of MITM?
373.
by catshirt 12y ago
> I had hoped this story was about a physical worm's brain being transplanted into a robot. isn't that so much less interesting with respect to technology, biology, and philosophy? isn't putting a biological brain into a r
374.
by catshirt 12y ago
used a ton of xslt. it's great for what it's good for (transforming xml). of course, if i had to do it all over again i wouldn't be using xml in the first place.
375.
by catshirt 12y ago
it first asks "what are you good at" then asks "what do you want to do". the employer can reconcile the difference.
376.
by catshirt 12y ago
pretty much all machines are already capable of killing us. they're just not smart enough to be able to want to yet. :)
377.
by catshirt 12y ago
having worked for a company on the whitelist (and worked with Twitter directly for "whitelisting" scenarios), i would have to guess this is for proper deep linking integration. that is, if Twitter links to "App X", Twitt
378.
by catshirt 12y ago
happened to me on this page: http://watson-ce-demo.mybluemix.net/ i changed Corpus to "Social Media" and hit "Submit". i refreshed the page and did the same thing and it worked.
379.
by catshirt 12y ago
this is really cool. i've had a few opportunities to work with kids at schools but i'm usually deterred because building a curriculum is daunting. this would be a great to use. i also love the tone and language. you gamify the pro
380.
by catshirt 12y ago
>> "Then why don't live coders use rich sounds, or make complicated things?" because there is no reason, because livecoding hasn't matured at the same rate as other production software. at the risk of painting a br
381.
by catshirt 12y ago
really cool. nested with_synth and with_fx calls seem less intuitive than an object oriented approach, which mirror traditional circuits. (synth.connect(fx1) fx1.connect(output)). what was the reasoning behind this? i only ask because i cou
382.
by catshirt 12y ago
the only thing more exciting than new senses is improving our current ones. the sky is the limit once we have strong understanding of how our brain interprets its inputs. replace your eyes with cameras (20/20 vision, ability to see &qu
383.
by catshirt 12y ago
i was scared to even breach this topic but I agree here too. the tone in my original post would have been very different if I could install an old version of iOS on my iPhone. strange you can't, no?
384.
by catshirt 12y ago
thank you for a thoughtful response. my point is not that "hardware gets deprecated" nor am I "mad" at anyone. are these really the only two possible interpretations of my post? my point is that just because Apple doesn&
385.
by catshirt 12y ago
please explain how this is any sort of relevant to my argument. i never compared Apple to anyone. i never suggested it would be in character for Apple to vocally disparage their old products. i never put a limit on "old" nor did I
386.
by catshirt 12y ago
> "2nd, they don't care about older-than-3 iphones" great, so we agree.
387.
by catshirt 12y ago
my experience with the iPhone is that Apple doesn't give a shit about old iPhones.
388.
by catshirt 12y ago
by similar measurements, your comment is just as "stupid".
389.
by catshirt 12y ago
the original comment was articulated just fine. the point is that science of all varieties has proven wrong over, and over, and over, and over, and over. science is a constant reevaluation of things we "know". thing is, we don&#x2
390.
by catshirt 12y ago
is the headline false? or is it a negligent reader who doesn't assume "with a contract" was implicit? equal parts both as I see it. don't throw stones in a glass house, so they say. anyway, the title of the article Is ir

More ›