catoc

15 ms·

241.
by catoc 5y ago
Your post it just fine. Shows enthusiasm, and provides argumentation why/what made you enthusiastic. Up voted for balance.
242.
by catoc 5y ago
This exactly. If it works it makes companies fly. Sadly when said companies grow, the managerial part needs to grow, but with that all too often true understanding of the technical core is diluted and diluted and diluted
243.
by catoc 6y ago
Could read just fine on iPhone 12p after zooming out; even in portrait
244.
by catoc 6y ago
Very nice! But no results for: https://iconduck.com/search?query=iconduck
245.
by catoc 6y ago
My response to the Apple Developer Feedback Request HOW CAN APPLE MAKE APP REVIEW BETTER? App Review has become faster but still feels very unsafe and unreliable. It feels like being delivered to the whims of the gods. They may strike you d
246.
by catoc 6y ago
Funny. But confusing - to me at least - is the naming of browserbird and compugter. Half of the time (I think?) browserbird is not a browser but a person; same with compugter. Alice and Bob would make things clearer.
247.
by catoc 6y ago
I know that feature! That is the one feature that makes users actually consult the help documentation. (and I would love to see how that is done - how the menus and their contents, were implemented to make them searchable!) Here's to 2
248.
by catoc 6y ago
So much YES, AGREE! Enter should open the application. Not f#%% edit it's name! (how often do you want that?? == almost never; versus 'open' == almost always)
249.
by catoc 6y ago
Wow, this has really got me thinking - thanks so much for sharing !
250.
by catoc 6y ago
If government backdoors are really necessary, the government should be able to provide an explanation without using the words 'terrorism' or 'child pornography'.
251.
by catoc 6y ago
No amount of tech or trust beats a black sticky tape. Thin enough to not damage anything; Removed and re-applied in a second without leaving residu; Zero discussion whether it will work or not
252.
by catoc 6y ago
... or someone who poked out one of your eyes? I mean you can't just blindly trust this guy.
253.
by catoc 6y ago
He also only needs one...
254.
by catoc 7y ago
I haven't had a television for the past 15 years - have not missed it one second. And what is this facebook thing?
255.
by catoc 7y ago
True.
256.
by catoc 7y ago
Your comment is indeed not helping, anyone in any way. It just bashes someone making a point, without adding anything of substance.
257.
by catoc 7y ago
> "... it's a free world, I'm free to critique it" He didn't say you're not free to critique it. He asked that if you do, critique it in a useful way: don't just shame it, but instead articulate what ex
258.
by catoc 7y ago
Exactly this
259.
by catoc 7y ago
Oh yes - and it's seeing massive investments. Last RSNA - largest Radiology conference - saw >100 AI startups showcasing their products. (half of which will probably be gone by December this year, bankrupt, taken over or merged)
260.
by catoc 7y ago
Can't comment on every industry, but in medicine - especially the 'pattern-recognition-specialties' such as formost pathology and radiology - the actual implementation/usefulness/impact of "AI" (ML/DL
261.
by catoc 7y ago
I did not. And more importantly, that wasn't the point at all. (other than that: yes I fully agree!)
262.
by catoc 7y ago
"Just send it back" is not the solution here. And not just for - as one real example - safety carabiners (for mountain climbing). Deceiving people is not okay. Ever. And especially not on the scale of Amazon. They're not tric
263.
by catoc 7y ago
Arrived in the Sierra Nevada right this moment - to ski.... to find a single patch off fake snow amidst green pastures
264.
by catoc 7y ago
This is mostly nonsense. eg : "If you talk to most surgeons, they would think of it as ‘what you cut through'" Surgeons actively use fascia to ease peeling off one structure of the other. They actively use fascia as conduit f
265.
by catoc 7y ago
Yes, the sugar industry was not silenced by this book, so the fight continued. And I am sure you can come up with criticisms about any research publication. But the main point is undisputed: the "low-fat" science at that time was
266.
by catoc 7y ago
I actually did read the book. It is really well researched. It certainly did not come across like that when the book was first published.
267.
by catoc 7y ago
Read this: https://thebigfatsurprise.com/ The website initially may look like yet another diet approach, but this is actually a serious publication. And a good read.
268.
by catoc 7y ago
Isn't Objective-C Smalltalk married to C?
269.
MRIs can better detect cancer in women with dense breasts, study finds(nytimes.com)
53 points by catoc 7y ago|15 comments
270.
by catoc 7y ago
Thanks for a great contribution. I really like the font - except for the italics. For comments I could may be learn to live with, but for the code syntax itself - no

More ›