catoc

6 ms·

1. 91.▲
   by catoc 9mo ago

   I remember that demo - thanks for the nostalgic flash back!
2. 92.▲
   by catoc 9mo ago

   So much for ‘stochastic parrots’
3. 93.▲
   by catoc 9mo ago

   The editor can be online - persistence is primarily local - that makes sense
4. 94.▲
   by catoc 9mo ago

   The settings icon ‘sprouting’ cogs is really nice! The editor also looks really nice. Could this not be used online as well? Persistence on the server instead of browser cache? (Curious what your use case is for an offline browser based edi
5. 95.▲
   by catoc 9mo ago

   If the point was triggering a reply, the length and sarcasm certainly worked. I agree brevity is always preferred. Making a good point while keeping it brief is much harder than rambling on. But length is just a measure, quality determines
6. 96.▲
   by catoc 9mo ago

   You do understand that one of those “needs”affects others around you, and one of them leaves them in peace, right? Also I’m sure parent wasn’t referring to emergency calls
7. 97.▲
   by catoc 9mo ago

   Thanks - the OP’s site was a truly horrible experience
8. 98.▲
   by catoc 9mo ago

   I firmly believe @threethirtytwo’s reply was not produced by an LLM
9. 99.▲
   by catoc 9mo ago

   https://archive.is/9JVkU
10. 100.▲
    by catoc 9mo ago

    I just tried Cowork.... It crashed with " Claude Code process terminated by signal SIGKILL ". Is Cowork Claude-Code-but-with-sandbox ?
11. 101.▲
    by catoc 9mo ago

    When local compute is more efficient data may remain local (e.g. when asking it to "find duplicate images" in millions of images it will likely (hopefully) just compute hashes and compare those), but complete folder contents are j
12. 102.▲
    by catoc 9mo ago

    So when using Cowork on a local folder and asking it to " create a new spreadsheet with a list of expenses from a pile of screenshots ", those screenshots may[*] become part of the " collected Inputs " kept by Anthropic.
13. 103.▲
    by catoc 9mo ago

    That an LLM needs input tokens to produce output was understood. That is not what the privacy policy is about. To me the policy reads Anthropic also subsequently persists ( “collects” ) your data. That is the point I was hoping to get clar
14. 104.▲
    by catoc 9mo ago

    Thanks - would you have a source for this confirmation?
15. 105.▲
    by catoc 9mo ago

    100% on board. This would be a paradigm shift for cloud services. (And take away a, for many significant, source of income - data they can sell, train on, etc - So I’m afraid the incentive to research an implement it will be lacking)
16. 106.▲
    by catoc 9mo ago

    Make a kind remark, get down voted? Why?
17. 107.▲
    by catoc 9mo ago

    Claude operate this patient Claude build my kitchen Claude produce a billion mobile phones
18. 108.▲
    by catoc 9mo ago

    I know managers think this is all there is to “work”, but at some point someone need do those action items.
19. 109.▲
    by catoc 9mo ago

    According to Anthropic’s privacy policy you collect my “Inputs” and “If you include personal data … in your Inputs, we will collect that information” Do all files accessed in mounted folders now fall under collectable “Inputs” ? Ref:
20. 110.▲
    by catoc 9mo ago

    If you don’t mind the terminal, what is the benefit of Cowork over Code? The sandboxing?
21. 111.▲
    by catoc 9mo ago

    That is the only implementation I can think of that might make me trust a third party with confidential data. Of course these massive transformers are already insanely computer intensive and adding FHE would make that orders of magnitude w
22. 112.▲
    by catoc 9mo ago

    ‘Actively hostile’ as in objecting to your content getting ripped off without permission?
23. 113.▲
    by catoc 9mo ago

    I’m glad to hear it’s helping you keep the costs down - that’s positive. It’s the type of popup that triggers my allergy - which as allergies go is mostly my problem.
24. 114.▲
    by catoc 9mo ago

    1. Enthusiastically try fileformat.info 2. “141 TCF vendor(s) and 69 ad partner(s) want to track you” 3. Exit :-(
25. 115.▲
    by catoc 10mo ago

    What I don’t understand is how you can work at a company like Flock and look yourself in the mirror. Seriously. You must be aware of the inherent evil, of the privacy invasive nature of your product, of how it’s being actively abused. How d
26. 116.▲
    by catoc 10mo ago

    Every once —
27. 117.▲
    by catoc 10mo ago

    I agree, it’s redundant. To us humans - to me at least - intelligence is always general (calculator: not; chimpansee: a little), so “general intelligence” can also already be considered redundant. Using “genuine” is more redundancy being he
28. 118.▲
    by catoc 10mo ago

    I interpret “artificial” in “artificial general intelligence” as “non-biological”. So in Tao’s statement I interpret “genuine” not as an adverb modifying the “artificial” adjective but as an attributive adjective modifying the noun “intelli
29. 119.▲
    by catoc 10mo ago

    This attitude is the reason “someone is going to get paid”. If you see a unattended laptop in a coffeeshop, do you steal it because “someone will steal it, so it might as well be me”?
30. 120.▲
    by catoc 10mo ago

    Agreed, there is some correlation between productivity and LoC. That said the correlation it’s weak; and does not say anything about quality (if anything quality might be inversely correlated; which too would be a very weak signal)