catlifeonmars

72 ms·

1381.
by catlifeonmars 7y ago
There are many ways to solve this problem. One way to do this is to model your test infrastructure in CloudFormation. You can then use an SSM Automation Document to manage the lifecycle of your test. Putting all your infrastructure in Cloud
1382.
by catlifeonmars 7y ago
I found this little gem on Software engineering StackExchange: https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2469... Suffice it to say, there are many interesting uses for string reversal :)
1383.
by catlifeonmars 7y ago
The masks is more for the coughing/infected person to wear, although they help reduce transmission on either side.
1384.
by catlifeonmars 7y ago
It’s been a few years since I’ve used GCC, but I believe you’ll want to compile with security flags (e.g. -fPIE -fstack-protector and friends)
1385.
by catlifeonmars 7y ago
I think that’s a good observation. Babel is probably a perfect place to start. Two things: (1) In Go you can trivially distribute pre built binaries for <num arch> * <num os> targets. Just building with GOOS set to windows, darw
1386.
by catlifeonmars 7y ago
Not to sound flippant or pretentious, but for me, $40 is practically free for a software tool. On top of that, I can expense licenses if I use them for my work. I’m guessing that most people in my position would have no problem paying $40 f
1387.
by catlifeonmars 7y ago
A lot of the problems related to organization of entities and type description can be solved by using out-of-band type metadata (i.e. GraphQL). It’s not a panacea by any means, and may not be the right fit for many APIs, but I’m surprised i
1388.
by catlifeonmars 7y ago
Proxy the calls to the external API via your own gateway. You’ll get better control over caching behavior, push complexity away from the client, and have more control over how you handle dependency failures. Also, you should load test lambd
1389.
by catlifeonmars 7y ago
Fortune 500/50 companies should be able to absorb the cost, no? If you have a lot of money, you can afford to make mistakes as long as the expected value (of many acquisitions) is positive in the long run. I’m not sure what the point o
1390.
by catlifeonmars 7y ago
Well put, and yes that is definitely a risk. As a software developer myself though, I find these stories to be a good learning opportunity.
1391.
by catlifeonmars 7y ago
> ... are brutally incurious ... This is an amazing phrase.
1392.
by catlifeonmars 8y ago
I was afraid someone would mention preprocessing out the asserts :) That also has its advantages, but would argue that it is impossible to selectively opt in or out. Honestly, for a well tested piece of code, the point is moot, since the as
1393.
by catlifeonmars 8y ago
It’s far better to let the caller decide. As a user of a library, I absolutely do not want a library terminating my process. Sure, some programs can benefit from this, but some programs need to guarantee that they keep running. Being able t