catchnear4321

7 ms·

61.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
tl;dr - fafo
62.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
interesting, have not kept up, this concern existed for many years but kept struggling to stick. it gets difficult to call bullshit on something that approximates well but not necessarily for the “right” reasons. it produces value. for some
63.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
massive cookie banner asking for your opt-in for data, on an ad about protecting your data. not the worst look. also not the best.
64.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
if everyone is a senior, surely we can flatten the hierarchy and minimize waste. but no two companies taste the same. instead of “wasting time” on mentoring a junior on how to work at this company, lots of top-heavy meetings where seniors d
65.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
far cheaper, yes, but duckdb leaks just as bad if you compromise credentials. also more than just an ec2 but that is always the risk. someone describes an idea in short form, someone else with insufficient experience tries to implement.
66.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
oh it is just a word, some letters, some sounds. less about the item, more the claimed reason for use.
67.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
and yet, here we are. you used the word for attention. you got it. buyer’s remorse?
68.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
assuming seeing “dicks” upset you, and you think “cunts” would upset someone else, this seems less like equality and more like an attempt at hurting others due to hurt. or are you truly glad?
69.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
snowflake has released a handful of statements and articles. giving attention to the ad would only be promoting it. unlikely to be allowed.
70.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
the ad for protection services?
71.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
> Activity by a commercial company in Israel called STOIC, because technically we disrupted the activity, not the company. hmm. is this legal cya because a name was named? naming and shaming is a curious choice. taking care to specify wh
72.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
not a hacker, not a hack. a performance and a prompt.
73.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
only when they can get a bigger fix from something else. it takes more than money to fuel these types, and they would have far better minders and bumpers if the downside outweighed the upside. they aren’t stupid, just addicted. musk was ad
74.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
> Breaking working functionality is not cool. if your product relied on temu scarjo, you never had a product.
75.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
many statements and few questions. why did you consider it worth continuing? one might say you put more effort in than i. more importance attributed than i?
76.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
that seems a bit unkind, does it not? did you not read the whole thread before answering?
77.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
window dressing his love for yud is showing.
78.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
e/aut
79.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
not really. you answered for them.
80.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
perhaps you should reread the comment you considered snarky?
81.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
was the post i was responding to kind?
82.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
> _________ does (_______ and) the world at large a disservice. what a flexible template.
83.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
yes. it was always a money grab, and now it is more transparent. this was just a startup selling a dream for a payday. it just hurts more because everyone is excited by the dream. this isn’t simply the loss of a better slap chop. other mone
84.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
sorry, are you asking why tech influencers aren’t in a different profession?
85.
by catchnear4321 2y ago
> It’s knowing what to write, and AI may be a multiplier there unless you think neuralink or similar is replacing your hands in a hurry, your wpm won’t be able to compete with tpm for long, no matter how fast you type, no matter where yo
86.
by catchnear4321 3y ago
would your wife normally watch nfl with you? if yes, for you or for nfl?
87.
by catchnear4321 3y ago
2023 - humans should make eco-friendly choices. ai is a massive source of energy consumption, and thus carbon emissions. 2024 - ai should make eco-friendly choices. humans are a massive source of energy consumption, and thus carbon emissi
88.
by catchnear4321 3y ago
the team supports the subscription model of the future. until all potentially “saveable” games are saved, or at least those over a certain popularity threshold, there is customer value to be squeezed. all the old content is valuable, becau
89.
by catchnear4321 3y ago
not so much crazy as self absorbed with a side of self esteem issues. a garbled collection of self-aggrandizement, harassing the reader, and terrible aesthetics, all to take the reader on a confused autobiographical walkabout with an unrel
90.
by catchnear4321 3y ago
did the brokers “share” money with gm? or data? surely this was a mutually beneficial arrangement.

More ›