catapart

7 ms·

31.
by catapart 4mo ago
so what makes you think that you aren't responding to a bot intending to sway your opinion by giving a shape to your preconceived notions so that your position crystallizes further, right now?
32.
by catapart 4mo ago
Wild to see people pretend like this isn't true while we're still in the middle of seeing how badly this shit has already fucked up hardware prices. in b4 the 'apples and oranges' cope
33.
by catapart 4mo ago
you nailed it! I tried it on a different machine, just to be sure, and it worked without a problem. So then I did a full restart on the mint machine and I got a whole new error that was talking about missing files. So I uninstalled deno and
34.
by catapart 4mo ago
here's a dump of the console: ``` catapart@snake:~/Development/magnitce-code-example$ deno install Warning The following packages are deprecated: ┖─ npm:boolean@3.2.0 (Package no longer supported. Contact Support at https:&#
35.
by catapart 4mo ago
unfortunately, while the project is in the public domain, it's pre-alpha so I haven't made the repo public yet. but the project is structured the same as another public domain project I've built, and I just checked to make su
36.
by catapart 4mo ago
EDIT: This was my fault. My machine did not take the update well and I did not confirm that the update worked before complaining about it (burned once before, so I was biased). After testing on a secondary machine and then forcing the upgra
37.
by catapart 4mo ago
Awesome! Looking forward to trying this out.
38.
by catapart 4mo ago
tough ask, but since we're here: has anyone done this with 16GB of VRAM? I've been getting projects finished with LM Studio, but it definitely could stand to be more efficient. lots of time wasted with trying to get models to unde
39.
by catapart 4mo ago
What was smart asssed, or rude, about it? That's what those games are called. GoldenEye was multiplayer. Halo 2 was online multiplayer. If you were asking what to call a game that has P2P multiplayer support using webrtc and therefore
40.
by catapart 4mo ago
"Multiplayer" or "Online Multiplayer". Pretty common in the days before WoW. They didn't invent "MMO" (was that Ultima?), but people called those a lot of different things, like "MUD" or "MU
41.
by catapart 4mo ago
this is the whiniest of whines. 'do not even ask for compensation, because I am tired of being advertised to'. you're not even willing to see an advertisement. one without sound or graphics at all. could you be more hig
42.
by catapart 4mo ago
lol. any of them - literally just ONE - could have a full blown UI so that you wouldn't have to build projects using a command line like it's 1985. or maybe one of them could just invest in packaging custom html elements, inst
43.
by catapart 4mo ago
I would love to see some analysis of this because based on the sales pitch, it sounds pretty sweet. But, sales pitches do tend to chase that quality.
44.
by catapart 4mo ago
yikes! that's pretty gross. I hope there's some appropriate consequences.
45.
by catapart 4mo ago
I wonder how long it will be before we see politician/celebrity houses with full 3d walkthroughs made from gaussian splats that source from this kind of "every type of interior in the world" mass data set. I wonder if that wi
46.
by catapart 5mo ago
a bit too simplistic for my tastes. I wouldn't call being inebriated the same as being dumb; but I would absolutely agree that being inebriated is way more fun, easy, and fulfilling than being sober. I would choose being inebriated ove
47.
by catapart 5mo ago
steelman, don't strawman. pushback on someone being rude by requesting something they could have looked up doesn't look like "let me google that for you" 95% of the time. it's far more likely to come out as "I&
48.
by catapart 5mo ago
the bitch of it, though, is that it doesn't only work if people listen to it. it also works if a bunch of AI bots can convincingly fake people listening to it. and, of course, those types of bots exist and have financial incentive
49.
by catapart 5mo ago
hell yeah! Thanks for pointing me towards this! Hadn't heard of it before. This looks great!
50.
by catapart 5mo ago
no, you seem to have me confused with someone else? I'm pissed because the CEO of a social media company said 'fuck the users' and then, when called out about it not only refused to apologize for that sentiment, but doubled d
51.
by catapart 5mo ago
It's mostly a trust thing. You're asking why I don't trust that if I "turn it off" it will be off. So the answer to that is: every US company I've ever dealt with (eventually, in some cases). I don't want
52.
by catapart 5mo ago
I don't. I'm asking them to let me make my own fork, like I can do with VSCode. RESPONSE EDIT (clear and intentional rate-limit evasion): hey thanks! that changes things quite a bit! Now I'm curious how well Claude could vibe
53.
by catapart 5mo ago
I need more than that because I have no guarantee that its true. I need the source. Or I at least need them to provide a build that they promise doesn't have that stuff in it at all, so that if any analysis was done on a decompilatio
54.
by catapart 6mo ago
very cool, thanks! And since I can't respond to that poster, I'll say it here: thanks for that detailed answer! That definitely seems like a pretty anonymous system. I'm convinced that monero is a pretty private coin!
55.
by catapart 6mo ago
so would that be a feature of monero-to-monero transactions? I'm still confused as to how it would actually be anonymous? like if I used another coin to exchange for monero, that's obviously traceable. so then I use monero to purc
56.
by catapart 6mo ago
wouldn't that defeat the privacy purpose? wouldn't someone be able to see that it was your card in the ATM, when they traced back the monero as exchanged for a coin that was exchanged for your fiat? ETA: just to be clear - that&#x
57.
by catapart 6mo ago
right on. I certainly empathize with your frustrations about "AGI". but rest assurred, I'm firmly in the camp of "not in my lifetime" and even further in the camp of "not without at least 3 more massive breakth
58.
by catapart 6mo ago
completely fair, and I agree. but let's talk 6 months/a year down the line - when a local LLM will be able to offer what claude code does only slower and a smaller context window. then do you whip out the local llm to handle the
59.
by catapart 6mo ago
the epilogue is what speaks to me most. all of the work I've done with llms takes that same kind of approach. I never link them to a git repo and I only ever ask them to make specific, well-formatted changes so that I can pick up where
60.
by catapart 6mo ago
oh, hell yeah! I hadn't heard of ts-morph. Seems like it would make transpiling to C# much simpler. I'll definitely give it a try. Thanks!

More ›