caskance

9 ms·

91.
by caskance 11y ago
That's not a problem with anticipation as a concept, that's a problem with bad anticipation. Certainly it's possible to detect whether the car is in a closed garage, and it will eventually be possible to predict whether you w
92.
by caskance 11y ago
Which is clearly a different trademark despite the fact that they share one word that is key to describing the product's functionality. Might as well compare Burger King and Whataburger.
93.
by caskance 11y ago
Yes, I know. If you look at their relationship after that suit and after iTunes launched, it's clear that it was only the latter that was a "problem".
94.
by caskance 11y ago
I had never heard of any but the first and Microsoft and Xamarin are so tight I had assumed it was just Visual studio with Xamarin sprinkles on top.
95.
by caskance 11y ago
So is "Word". I would be equally surprised if Google released word processing software called "Android Word".
96.
by caskance 11y ago
Do you have any examples of some that act as IDEs or similar? The ones I know of are all created by Microsoft. Apple Records didn't have a problem with Apple Computer until Apple Computer started selling music.
97.
by caskance 11y ago
Yes. There is at least Windows App Studio ( http://appstudio.windows.com ) that I know of offhand and Microsoft Robotics Developer Studio ( http://www.microsoft.com/robotics ) that I found in 5 seconds of searching.
98.
by caskance 11y ago
Does Microsoft really not care when competitors release their own IDEs called * Studio?
99.
by caskance 11y ago
Rare inconvenience may be more easily tolerated, but it is no less inconvenient. The fact that you can even say "well it's only 2 days delay" seems insane to me.
100.
by caskance 11y ago
Different axis aka not security. The security is much better. But it's slow and inconvenient.
101.
by caskance 11y ago
Which is itself horrendous on a different axis.
102.
by caskance 11y ago
Most customers find it convenient that the exchange they use doesn't abruptly get all its (and by extension, its clients') assets seized by government officials for not complying with financial regulations.
103.
by caskance 11y ago
Surely informing you that you were wrong should be sufficient to prompt you to look up what I was actually referring to. It would take all of 4 seconds. If you're not going to do even that little, rudely stop replying.
104.
by caskance 11y ago
I'll take that as a no, since you've clearly confused it with Occam's.
105.
by caskance 11y ago
Never heard of Hanlon's razor?
106.
by caskance 11y ago
It's not a productive line of argument. We want to keep doing those things. Might as well say that the solution to traffic accidents is for everyone to stop driving.
107.
by caskance 11y ago
Surveillance on specific targets is only useful if we are allowed to assume that surveillance sometimes works.
108.
by caskance 11y ago
Which third party is this?
109.
by caskance 11y ago
KeePass is open source. If you feel like you can do a better job in certain aspects, please consider sharing those changes so that others can benefit.
110.
by caskance 11y ago
Instead, the current CA system means we've conceded all TLS.
111.
by caskance 11y ago
Not in my experience, but whatevs.
112.
by caskance 11y ago
I already gave you my evidence - the current state of American speeding enforcement and surveillance. If you don't like it, that's not my problem. And no, this has nothing to do with what I want. I'd love the opposite to be t
113.
by caskance 11y ago
That's not what unfalsifiable means. If it were false, we would see evidence, such as speed limits being lower and actually respected, and strong widespread opposition to government surveillance. I think the word you're looking fo
114.
by caskance 11y ago
A poll would merely tell you what people say they value. What people actually value is apparent from reality.
115.
by caskance 11y ago
Most people value the ability to drive 5 mph faster more than they value the right to not be constantly monitored by the government. Sorry you had to find out this way.
116.
by caskance 11y ago
It's not correct to lump all westerners into one group like that. Although this attitude is probably quite foreign to Americans, I see it quite often among Swedes and Danes.
117.
by caskance 11y ago
One of the flaws about talking with an overloaded term like "security". If even abstractly, something does not work, what's the point of arguing about its technical details? As you said before, DNSSEC is fine if you concede .
118.
by caskance 11y ago
That's within the context of it being a trial open to the public.
119.
by caskance 11y ago
The whole concept of certificates in the first place relies on your ability to keep the private key secret. You know what you really have no recourse to? The police coming when you are asleep and "interrogating" you until you give
120.
by caskance 11y ago
The security community is not in any one place. The only thing even theoretically secure to a government is another government, and reality almost always falls short of that. That has nothing to do with technology, just politics.

More ›