Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
casey2
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
511.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
The problem is that people are often delusional and AI feeds these delusions. You have to switch to objective measures to gain skill and taste. This is true for art (ask: Where is the focal point) instead of "is this good or necessary&
512.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
This is entirely a problem of AI sycophancy. You would expect a system that has expert level knowledge in so many domains to be overly cynical and straight up tell you that "No, there is no market for a language learning app, Duolingo
513.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
ARC 2 was made specifically to artificially lower contemporary LLM scores, therefore any kind of model improvements will have outsized effects Also people use "saturated" too liberally. The top left corner 1 cent per task is satur
514.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
We don't need real world benchmarks, if they were good for real world tasks people would use them We need scientific benchmarks that tease out the nature of intelligence. There are plenty of unsaturated benchmarks. Solving chess using
515.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
You don't have to benchmax everything, just the benchmarks in the right social circles
516.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
Makes sense. Amazon is making VERY bad investments just to pump Bezos' personal investments in related industries
517.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
Coz the paper gives a function for extrapolating from these tests. This is purely testing thermal decay. 10,000 years sounds like a good benchmark and isn't as obviously ridiculous as saying a million years at 260°C
518.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
No, the moat is having a seemingly good "scalable" idea that solves a problem a few people have and most people think they have. Then getting bought out. The zip2s and OpenClaws of the world
519.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
Of course AI is bullshit. If you couldn't just use it yourself and figure that out then ask yourself why people like Bezos or Altman are perfectly happy "investing" other people's money but not their own. If they actuall
520.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
By walking to the car wash, driving it anywhere else, then driving it to the car wash.
521.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
>Since you want to wash your car and the car wash is only 50 meters away, driving is the better option. While it's a very short distance, you need the car at the facility to actually use the service! -gemini flash free tier When you
522.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
Oh please, why equate IT BS with cancer? If the null pointer was a billion dollar mistake, then C was a trillion dollar invention. At this scale of investment countries will have no problem cheapening the value of human life. It's part
523.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
I think there is lots of value in a model that mimics your behavior. So your partner or anyone can message "you" at any time of the day. work, sleep, socialize you can only do 2. With the help of AI you could talk to people as muc
524.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
the Linux man page I have installed online says this isn't ASCII and it even made this face when I asked it O _ o
525.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
You are not entitled to that food or land over there, neither am I. What are we gonna do about it? You're naive if you think your immune to social exploitation just cause you write some words. Your entire being is defined by social exp
526.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
Presumably if one uses a styled "language-learning app" and are shown testimonals saying something like "I used X and learned language Y" then they are using the app with the goal of learning the language. Also the poste
527.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
Hi "Tim", are you aware that this is fraud? That this app doesn't help anyone? How do you prevent gullible users from wasting their time and money on the app rather than learning languages? From your testimonial that you lear
528.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
What happens if oil companies can't make money? They will restructure society so they can. That's the essence of capitalism, the willingness to restructure society to chase growth. Obviously this tech is profitable in some world.
529.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
I think you are making that confusion. Any robotic system in the place of his parents would fail with a few hours. There are more novel tasks in a day than ARC provides.
530.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
This is just petty tribalism. How is this different than Red Hat devs using macbooks or whatever. Reasonable people can recognize the right tool for the job. If the productivity didn't grow it would be a bad idea to organize society ar
531.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
The agent isn't trying to close the ticket. It's predicting the next token and randomly generated an artifact that looks like a hit piece. Computer programs don't "try" to do anything.
532.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
Why is the title so misleading? That isn't at all what the study measured. Just read the article 1) looked at a group of 80-year-olds for 8 years 2) checked their economic status throughout life using reading and leisure time (# of lib
533.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
We have webs of trust, just swap router/packet with PID/PR Then the maintainer can see something like 10-1 accepted/rejected for first layer (direct friends) 1000-40 for layer two (friends of friends) and so own. Then you can
534.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
While it's funny either way I think the interest comes from the perception that it did so autonomously. Which I have my money on, cause then why would it apologize right afterwards, after spending a 4 hours writing blogpost. Nor could
535.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
Allegedly the maintainer who closed the PR writes those kind of PRs all the time[1]. Is Scott a first time contributor? https://crabby-rathbun.github.io/mjrathbun-website/blog/post...
536.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
IMO it's antisocial behavior on the project for dictating how people are allowed to interact with it. Sure GNU is in the rights to only accept email patches to closed maintainers. The end result -- people using AI will gatekeep you ri
537.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
When design a language for everything nobody will use it for anything. When you design a language to simply accomplish one thing people will use it for everything. This is because people get the most efficient training using that simple lan
538.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
"Fraud" has become a major political weapon since "Operation Chokepoint" and earlier (check wikileaks) If the government is going to act irrationally and (through visa/mc) prevent legitimate transactions then people
539.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
Humans have been around for millions of years, only a few thousand of which they've spend reading and writing. For most of that time you are lucky if you can understand what your neighbor is saying. If we consider humans with the same
540.
▲
by
casey2
8mo ago
I'm confused about the typescript jab. I'm not a web dev, but to my understanding is that you can easily get a target machines' instructions for typescript if you want. It's much closer to "real programming" th
More ›