casey2

20 ms·

451.
by casey2 8mo ago
If the model wasn't trained on copyleft, if he didn't use a copyleft test suite and if he wasn't the maintainer for years. Clearly the intent here is copyright infringement. If you have software your testsuite should be your
452.
by casey2 8mo ago
You're describing valueless automation. We can build an assembly line and mass produce cars, that only has value if society is restructured. The food delivery industry only moves a trillion (globally) because it's incredibly waste
453.
by casey2 8mo ago
there is nobody making a new one ever week.
454.
by casey2 8mo ago
When did search replace all research jobs? How can an AI replace a masseuse? How far away away are we getting from an LLM that scratches your back for less than it costs you to do it? People have unrealistic expectations because they litera
455.
by casey2 8mo ago
I don't support these laws for the same reason I wouldn't support national, gendered and racial APIs. Anonymity is a fundamental human right, segregation isn't. It hasn't even been a year since the supreme court ruled in
456.
by casey2 8mo ago
Programming languages are natural and ambiguous too, what does READ mean? you have to look it up to see the types. The power comes from the fact that it's audit-able, but that you don't need to audit it every time you want to writ
457.
by casey2 8mo ago
Very nice. But "Models excel at code, but not at visual inspection" is limited, Claude excel's at code cause that is anthropics main focus. Google will leapfrog them soon. I could never see Claude doing this without a human i
458.
by casey2 8mo ago
Misanthropic, please make a new slack with one 9
459.
by casey2 8mo ago
That's because they spent a couple hundred years with a society structured around low/no growth and enforced familial occupations. There isn't much to do in such a society other than refine your craft aesthetically and wait f
460.
by casey2 8mo ago
Pretty simple, if the model was trained on GPL or any copyleft then the output is copyleft (in whole or in part!) you just have a really long preprocessing step before hitting compile.
461.
by casey2 8mo ago
Most serious people realized decades ago that you just build a bunch of nuclear powered DAC and require oil companies sequester it. What occurred for last 30 years was a bunch of nonsense political BS and signaling that annoys effective peo
462.
by casey2 8mo ago
You miss the fact that China's GDP per capita is 1/6th the US. So to produce 1/6th per person they emits 2/3rds the CO2. Which means in total, the thing that matters, is that china produces 4 times the CO2 with no end in
463.
by casey2 8mo ago
We aren't hunter gather's, mammals have been around for hundreds of millions of years, and Modern Humans can just use air conditioning tech, most people in india already have a tanki, people will just dig as far as they need to ke
464.
by casey2 8mo ago
I'm confident that pushing everyone involved with Starship into the ocean would be a better and faster and more ethical green transition.
465.
by casey2 8mo ago
Nothing can be done about it. If you leave it up to the market it will spiral away forever since the cost of dealing with the problem always increases both due to the size of the problem growing and the cost to insure solutions compounding.
466.
by casey2 8mo ago
Nor any semicolons. Also full of nonsense. SWF fundamentally runs action script. The idea that you are going to have a AS3 to C# transpiler and a C# scripting engine AND export SWFs is incongruous. Again, "C# code executed when the pla
467.
by casey2 8mo ago
It's just selling a scam. I've never been impressed by a flash game, but I'm impressed by programs written in general languages daily and for longer than flash has existed. The worst thing about tech is people who don't
468.
by casey2 8mo ago
Why don't you think about the cruelty of preventing King Jon from being with Gemini in the sky? The death, if caused by anything, was caused by a Jon's religious belief. You are implicitly using your own system of values to come
469.
by casey2 8mo ago
The ability to talk to the model is the product not the text it generates, that is public domain (or maybe the user owns still up for debate) Models can't "convince" or "encourage" anything, people can, they can rol
470.
by casey2 8mo ago
I feel like the "god clause" applies here. It often happens that some people try to sue god, which doesn't really make any sense so it's banned. What google other LLM providers do is offer a service that simulates a comp
471.
by casey2 8mo ago
I thought it was "contract and spread" you can't even get your own disinfo straight
472.
by casey2 8mo ago
I've never heard of Google Meet, but I usually see the successful devs who get Sherlocked are the ones who jump to a bigger pond. As for platform dependency you want to have all your code internal and an API layer negotiating between t
473.
by casey2 8mo ago
uh huh. Increase the retirement age for "knowledge workers" (desk jobs) to 90 or 3 public accidents
474.
by casey2 8mo ago
It's more that they paid $20K for "direct action training"
475.
by casey2 8mo ago
This seems like the worst of both worlds. If you don't care about the social/interpersonal aspect of reading then just use the internet. If you do, go to a real library. Seems to be entirely a boredom-fueled bird-watching project
476.
by casey2 8mo ago
More accurate to say that Humans are biased towards valuing "human" activity. Logically text is text, and the value is independent of the creator. News flash people are racist/bigoted, they love to create arbitrary in/ou
477.
by casey2 8mo ago
In 2016 Musk was saying self driving cars where here now, he'll be saying the same in 2036. And Power from Humans (PfH) isn't a joke Manoj Bhargava is already working on it [1]. Of course the high quality human stock from Stanford
478.
by casey2 8mo ago
Usability is the wrong metric, paint by numbers is more "usable" (sic accessible) than a canvas but you'd be depressed watching your son graduate art school and that's all he can do. If you do want to optimize for usabil
479.
by casey2 8mo ago
>bought “Yes” shares in the “U.S. strikes Iran by February 28, 2026?” market just hours before explosions were reported in Tehran and other cities. If these sites were serious about their promise they would freeze betting so people have
480.
by casey2 8mo ago
It hasn't even passed the original turning test, depending on the question. There are an unlimited number of questions that cause LLMs to give inhuman looking answers. As for writing in general slop score is still higher than a human b

More ›